Trump Is Fucked

[Seshmeister]

Can you imagine what it'll be like when he wins this election?

Yeah that's why we are posting about it. 90% of everyone in all the US allied countries or the western world whatever you want to call it are fucking stressed about half the US electorate treating their vote like it's a funny game show thing.

Working people voting for an authoritarian rich guy who is not smart and hoping he will help them is weird.

As for the rest of the world, one of the movies nominated for an Oscar this year is called '20 days in Mariupol', please watch it.

[Nickdfresh]

Like the Clintons have done how many times? NickDelusionalDumbocrat

Bill, for whatever a sleaze he was, was never this fucking stupid and hired good lawyers, listened to and paid them as he was one... VonDeMAGAvagina...

[Catfish]

Seek help for your TDS.

For real. What's the program with these folks? I stopped posting for a zillion years and the same people are still here bitching about Trump. Can you imagine what it'll be like when he wins this election?

[Kristy]

There is nothing wrong with Taylor Swift's music. Still kicks the crap out of your Boomer Vomit bands.

[FORD]

Ridiculous. If Taylor Swift were a Satanist, her music would be better.

[Seshmeister]

I think what is allowed in the appeal will be telling. I don’t think you or I know what is right here. Your logic seems sound, but I have a feeling a neutral judge would provide more leeway here and the jury may have a different take.

You don’t see anything amiss with re-writing the statute of limitations from an Attorney General with a stated mission of bringing down Trump. It stinks and not just a little bit.

I wasn't aware of that. There is so much fake stuff flying about just now, the singer in my band sent me a story today about Taylor Swift being a cloned satanist.

The statute of limitations thing is maybe something brought in by a Republican guy ages ago?

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-powerful-new-york-law-that-finally-brought-trump-to-book

I really don't buy this victim card thing, no matter what your politics you have to admit Trump is an extremely rich and powerful person and if his actions or policies happen to agree with what you agree with that's purely accidental on his part.

[Nitro Express]

Oh the drama. Ha! Ha!

[Von Halen]

I think what is allowed in the appeal will be telling. I don’t think you or I know what is right here. Your logic seems sound, but I have a feeling a neutral judge would provide more leeway here and the jury may have a different take.

You don’t see anything amiss with re-writing the statute of limitations from an Attorney General with a stated mission of bringing down Trump. It stinks and not just a little bit.

Like the Clintons have done how many times? NickDelusionalDumbocrat

[Nickdfresh]

[Nickdfresh]

I think you got the wrong end of the stick there as Trump intended.

In our systems of justice once you have been found guilty by a jury as Trump has you are not allowed to say that your accuser is a liar because that is the settled opinion of the court. This was not an appeal it was a defamation case because Trump had continued to say that the victim was lying.

He wasn't allowed to present a defense of the original crime because he had already done that and been found guilty by a jury in the first case. All he was able to defend was whether he had been defaming her which given all the video evidence and that he was muttering it throughout the court case didn't give him much of a chance of winning that.

Meanwhile in one of his other cases he is boasting about how wealthy he is so naturally her lawyers said that this guy is super rich he is continuing to deny the jury finding in the first case so you need to hit him with such a big judgement he shuts up.

For you or me that might mean $20k but for Trump they(the jury in the second case) decided it would take $83 million.

And the situation I think he is referring too, Trump was melting down and attempting to "defend" himself in the penalty phase, after he had been found guilty and was and is such an asshole he alienated the jury and boosted his penalty to $83 million. Or maybe he was playing 3D chess? And oh yeah, his lawyer is a retard...

[Nickdfresh]

I think what is allowed in the appeal will be telling. I don’t think you or I know what is right here. Your logic seems sound, but I have a feeling a neutral judge would provide more leeway here and the jury may have a different take.

You don’t see anything amiss with re-writing the statute of limitations from an Attorney General with a stated mission of bringing down Trump. It stinks and not just a little bit.

Trump's appeal in the civil defamation case? DOA...

I know, it's really terrible that Trump cannot just randomly murder political enemies and not be charged unless he is impeached, in which case he could assassinate all of the key impeachers.

I mean you sound like a dumb partisan hypocrite here. You've raved about Trudeau being a dictatorial monster but are just fine with effectively codifying the allowing of a sitting US president to become one and use "SEAL Team 6 to assassinate political rivals"...

[Romeo Delight]

I think you got the wrong end of the stick there as Trump intended.

In our systems of justice once you have been found guilty by a jury as Trump has you are not allowed to say that your accuser is a liar because that is the settled opinion of the court. This was not an appeal it was a defamation case because Trump had continued to say that the victim was lying.

He wasn't allowed to present a defense of the original crime because he had already done that and been found guilty by a jury in the first case. All he was able to defend was whether he had been defaming her which given all the video evidence and that he was muttering it throughout the court case didn't give him much of a chance of winning that.

Meanwhile in one of his other cases he is boasting about how wealthy he is so naturally her lawyers said that this guy is super rich he is continuing to deny the jury finding in the first case so you need to hit him with such a big judgement he shuts up.

For you or me that might mean $20k but for Trump they(the jury in the second case) decided it would take $83 million.

I think what is allowed in the appeal will be telling. I don’t think you or I know what is right here. Your logic seems sound, but I have a feeling a neutral judge would provide more leeway here and the jury may have a different take.

You don’t see anything amiss with re-writing the statute of limitations from an Attorney General with a stated mission of bringing down Trump. It stinks and not just a little bit.

[Seshmeister]

I am not following all that closely, but in that most recent trial, which was the defamation one, The "judge" prohibited the most basic facts from being brought into the court as evidence.

I think you got the wrong end of the stick there as Trump intended.

In our systems of justice once you have been found guilty by a jury as Trump has you are not allowed to say that your accuser is a liar because that is the settled opinion of the court. This was not an appeal it was a defamation case because Trump had continued to say that the victim was lying.

He wasn't allowed to present a defense of the original crime because he had already done that and been found guilty by a jury in the first case. All he was able to defend was whether he had been defaming her which given all the video evidence and that he was muttering it throughout the court case didn't give him much of a chance of winning that.

Meanwhile in one of his other cases he is boasting about how wealthy he is so naturally her lawyers said that this guy is super rich he is continuing to deny the jury finding in the first case so you need to hit him with such a big judgement he shuts up.

For you or me that might mean $20k but for Trump they(the jury in the second case) decided it would take $83 million.

[Romeo Delight]

I can't watch pro Trump evangelicals talk about him because it is too depressing.

Apart from everything else and that's a big everything, he was found by a US jury to have committed a sexual assault on a woman. There are so many crimes and misdemeanors at this point they all seem to cancel themselves out in minds of many voters.

I am not following all that closely, but in that most recent trial, which was the defamation one, The "judge" prohibited the most basic facts from being brought into the court as evidence.

You don't actually believe that trial to be anything more than a gross example of justice gone wrong and entirely politically motivated. They literally changed the statute of limitations JUST so this case could be brought forward. It is certain to be appealed and I can't see it standing. Maybe you are referring to another trial.

[Nickdfresh]

Seek help for your TDS.

Seriously, you like this guy that didn't know the concept of "supply chains" he had never "heard of" and thinks it's supply change. Pretty sure problems of "supply chains" are beyond any president's capacity and he is no less culpable than Sleepy Joe is in all that...

I mean, 7 years of Wharton College down the drain....