Cnn On Fire!!!!
During a March 21st edition of CNN Headline News, a fire broke out in the studio just above the heads of the two anchors, Chuck Roberts and Linda Stouffer. You can hear the hesitation in Roberts' voice as he narrates a series of video clips, and then when the shot goes back to the two anchors, an electrical fixture blows up above Stouffer's head while she is on camera.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NXASAv0klA
Probably a FAUX prank.
Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992
Originally posted by FORD
Probably a FAUX prank.
Of course.
Originally posted by ELVIS
I guess you're right...
The only reason CNN has such terrible ratings compared to Fox is because damn near EVERY FUCKING SHOW AND PERSONALITY THEY HAVE SUCKS.
You can sit and bitch about Fox being a conservative "outlet", but the fact is they have people and shows that are interesting to watch. CNN is a bore-a-thon.
Don't expect me to defend CNN. They're actually worse than FAUX.
Both networks are Chimp blowing propagandists, but everyone KNOWS that's the case with FAUX. CNN is still considered credible, because they were a legitimate news network before AOL-CIA bought them out. So they get away with lying and Chimp worship more often.
CNN=COMMUNIST NEWS NETWORK
It's more like the Corporatist News Network, actually.
No, it's been known as the Clinton News Network for the longest time, and it will be even more so when Hillary announces she's running in '08.
Originally posted by Warham
No, it's been known as the Clinton News Network for the longest time, and it will be even more so when Hillary announces she's running in '08.
I log on, and read the first 2 threads.
This one, and the one with Andy Card leaving.
They BOTH contain posts from you mentioning Clintons
Don't ever try and tell us you don't beat the Clinton Drum constantly in here.
jesus
Originally Posted by Kristy
Well I wouldn't relly on either network for news. But you have to admit the female anchors on FOX are fuckin hot!
Mission accomplished!Originally posted by LoungeMachine
I log on, and read the first 2 threads.
This one, and the one with Andy Card leaving.
They BOTH contain posts from you mentioning Clintons
Don't ever try and tell us you don't beat the Clinton Drum constantly in here.
jesus
Plus...
For the mutha-fuckin' BILLIONTH TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FOX HAS A GAGGLE OF HOT CHICKS!!!
Laurie Dhue"me"
Jane "flute" Skinner
Umu Poongemebadju
Rebecca Go-downonme-mez
Kiran "wish I would've been the one to get her preggers" Chetry
Megan Ken"barbie"dall
Etc, etc...
That guy that knocked Kiran up is one lucky SOB.
Meet us in the future, not the pasture
Is Kiran the one that's on FOX & Friends sometimes?
She's nice to look at.
She used to be. Supposed to be back soon from maternity leave.
Ah, she's married to the FOX weather forecaster.
32 years old.
And whom does Hillary represent?Originally posted by Warham
No, it's been known as the Clinton News Network for the longest time, and it will be even more so when Hillary announces she's running in '08.
The DLC/AIPAC Corporatists.
Hillary represents the Democratic majority, and they will vote for her in droves.
Doubtful.Originally posted by Warham
Hillary represents the Democratic majority, and they will vote for her in droves.
Originally posted by conmee
If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.
That is all.
Icon.Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667
Originally posted by Isaac R.
Then it's really true??:eek:
The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???
OMFG...who in their right mind...???
Originally posted by eddie78
I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.
It is?Originally posted by jhale667
Doubtful.
Do you have a candidate on your mind who will beat her for the nomination?
John Kerry? John Edwards? Biden?
Originally posted by Warham
It is?
Do you have a candidate on your mind who will beat her for the nomination?
John Kerry? John Edwards? Biden?
Oh, sorry...I was already past the nomination and up to the election.
I don't, but I can't see her getting it handed to her. A lot of Democrats here are starting to call her a Warhawk. If you were to ask me if she's get re-elected to as Senator, I'd say yes.Originally posted by Warham
It is?
Do you have a candidate on your mind who will beat her for the nomination?
John Kerry? John Edwards? Biden?
Roth Army Militia
I'm sorry, Ford, but I find that hilarious. But then again, I studied with a lot of peeps who are at CNN now.Originally posted by FORD
Both networks are Chimp blowing propagandists, but everyone KNOWS that's the case with FAUX. CNN is still considered credible, because they were a legitimate news network before AOL-CIA bought them out. So they get away with lying and Chimp worship more often.
No, Maybe, and NO FUCKING WAY IN HELL!Originally posted by Warham
It is?
Do you have a candidate on your mind who will beat her for the nomination?
John Kerry? John Edwards? Biden?
Yeah, like most hot chicks, staring at the piece of cathode-ray eye candy keeps you from actually thinking about the droning crap they spew...Originally posted by Warham
Is Kiran the one that's on FOX & Friends sometimes?
She's nice to look at.
She's not going to run...Originally posted by Warham
It is?
Do you have a candidate on your mind who will beat her for the nomination?
John Kerry? John Edwards? Biden?
Not if you watch with the sound down.Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Yeah, like most hot chicks, staring at the piece of cathode-ray eye candy keeps you from actually thinking about the droning crap they spew...
But seriously, you are painting with a pretty broad brush there. I could say the same thing and say it's obvious you prefer looking at ugly chicks.
Originally posted by diamondD
Not if you watch with the sound down.
I do, with NPR in the background...
I also watch The Weather Channel if I'm around and Heather Tesch or Jen Carfagno is on...
No woman is ugly, just temporarily beer-goggle impaired...But seriously, you are painting with a pretty broad brush there. I could say the same thing and say it's obvious you prefer looking at ugly chicks.
What?!?
Were they telling the truth?!?
LOL!
Objects After Beer Are Uglier Than They Appear
What time is Idol on?Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
What?!?
Were they telling the truth?!?
LOL!
Biden 2008!!
ROTH ARMY MILITIA
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.
Read the headlines, counselor... the days of the neocon agenda are OVER.Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Biden 2008!!
Fuck Joe Biden and the AIPAC horse he rode in on.
Maybe to Edwards? I mean, I don't know. He didn't win the nomination and then as the running mate they didn't win the office. I can see him trying again, but I don't see him going far.Originally posted by FORD
No, Maybe, and NO FUCKING WAY IN HELL!
I have a feeling that it'll be Democrat from the South and it'll be someone closer to the center who can try to swing over some Republicans who are disagreeing more than agreeing with Bush.
Who that is, I have no clue. I just had a feeling and thought I'd put it out there.
Allen in '08!
She's going to run.Originally posted by Nickdfresh
She's not going to run...
Yep. She won't even asnwer when her constituents ask if she's going to run for President after running for re-lection and changes the topic. If she had no plans to or desire, she would say no.Originally posted by Warham
She's going to run.
She may have the desire, but she's not about to put up with the shit...
Edwards fits that description very well. But he's distancing himself from the DLC, probably because they have become a tool of AIPAC and the corporatists, rather than the "centrist" group they claim to be.Originally posted by Ally_Kat
Maybe to Edwards? I mean, I don't know. He didn't win the nomination and then as the running mate they didn't win the office. I can see him trying again, but I don't see him going far.
I have a feeling that it'll be Democrat from the South and it'll be someone closer to the center who can try to swing over some Republicans who are disagreeing more than agreeing with Bush.
Who that is, I have no clue. I just had a feeling and thought I'd put it out there.
I don't mind a centrist, as long as he's not a corporatist. The reason I started the "Gore/Edwards" thread a few weeks ago is because those are two guys I believe have the best shot of wininng in the current environment. There's still too much fear of the phantom "terraists" to elect a true Liberal like Dennis Kucinich, though we should take serious look at his platform and see which parts CAN fit the current climate. Being opposed to corporatist trade policies which are destroying living wage jobs in this country, for example. Edwards should definitely embrace such an idea, given his talk of "two Americas".
In any case, the Democratic base will not accept a Bush lite candidate this time. We won't settle for a slightly whitewashed PNAC foreign policy. Take a hint from the Israeli people and tell the neocon shitbags where to stick it.
She's already pulling out Bible quotes, trying to appeal to the Christians in this country. It won't work though, because she also has to appeal to the moveon.org crowd.Originally posted by Nickdfresh
She may have the desire, but she's not about to put up with the shit...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote