Spiderman 3 Review Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Little Texan
    Full Member Status

    • Jan 2004
    • 4579

    Spiderman 3 Review Thread

    I just got back from watching Spiderman 3, and I don't really know what to think of it. It wasn't a bad movie, but it wasn't a particularly good movie, either. It has too many slow periods, and the plot is all over the place...too many plotlines, too much stuff going on in this movie...they tried to cover too many characters, and it didn't work, for me at least. The end of the movie is a real down note...you won't leave feeling upbeat about the ending, and they didn't set it up for the next movie that I could see. The movie was ok, nothing to call home about, but Spiderman 2 was much better than this one! Had plenty of dazzling special effects, though.
  • hotdog@ a shake
    Head Fluffer
    • Mar 2004
    • 257

    #2
    Holy SHit ...

    My review echoes your review to a tee dude ...

    I stiil don't know exactly what to make of it, but I know I won't watch it again, at least for a good while.

    My kids liked it tho, as usual.

    Comment

    • Dan
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Jan 2004
      • 12179

      #3
      So do you think buying a Big Tub of PopCorn would help you get you through the slow action parts?
      First Roth Army Kiwi To See Van Halen Live 6/16/2012 Phoenix Arizona.

      Comment

      • Panamark
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Jan 2004
        • 17113

        #4
        George Lucas said to the press that he thought Spiderman 3
        was "A Silly Movie"
        BABY PANA 2 IS Coming !! All across the land, let the love and beer flow !
        Love ya Mary Frances!

        Comment

        • RuzDNailz
          Foot Soldier
          • Nov 2004
          • 655

          #5
          Truth is, the movie was dragged out in many parts. I liked having more villians this time around and especially venom. I thought for second that it had Carnage in it, but I was mistaken. Some parts were good, nontheless, but we left the theatre with a big sigh of relief!

          Comment

          • Dan
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Jan 2004
            • 12179

            #6
            How much is it to see a Movie?

            We pay NZ$14.00 a Ticket for a Adult.
            First Roth Army Kiwi To See Van Halen Live 6/16/2012 Phoenix Arizona.

            Comment

            • RuzDNailz
              Foot Soldier
              • Nov 2004
              • 655

              #7
              Originally posted by Dan
              How much is it to see a Movie?

              We pay NZ$14.00 a Ticket for a Adult.
              Probably the same for us depending on where you go. You can pay half price on Tuesdays for an evening show or pay 7 bucks for any
              movie at a cheaper cinema. Problem with the cheaper cinemas is that they aren't stadium style seating and the seats torture your back!

              PLEASE do NOT get me ranting about how expensive the snacks and drinks are.

              Comment

              • MERRYKISSMASS2U
                Full Member Status

                • Mar 2004
                • 4372

                #8
                I plan on seeing it next Tuesday with my best friend and two other of our good buddies.

                Originally posted by Dan
                How much is it to see a Movie?

                We pay NZ$14.00 a Ticket for a Adult.
                14 New Zealand dollars = 10.2662 U.S. dollars

                We pay 7 bucks, and it's a nice theater. 10 bucks I think for the nice-ass one with stadium seats, it is a huge facility.
                Last edited by MERRYKISSMASS2U; 05-12-2007, 04:04 AM.

                Comment

                • Dan
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 12179

                  #9
                  Originally posted by RuzDNailz
                  Probably the same for us depending on where you go. You can pay half price on Tuesdays for an evening show or pay 7 bucks for any
                  movie at a cheaper cinema. Problem with the cheaper cinemas is that they aren't stadium style seating and the seats torture your back!

                  PLEASE do NOT get me ranting about how expensive the snacks and drinks are.
                  We bring in our own Food and Drinks.

                  Seats,We have to sit on the floor.

                  I would rather see a Movie at Home,Drink and eat when you like and if you need to take a piss just pause the movie.

                  They need to bring back intermission time.3 hour movie without a break is Fucking Crazy.
                  First Roth Army Kiwi To See Van Halen Live 6/16/2012 Phoenix Arizona.

                  Comment

                  • bueno bob
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 22830

                    #10
                    I've been hearing the same thing; "Spider-Man Emo", I've heard it described as...while it DOES seem like there's an awful lot going on (w/ Hobgoblin, Sandman, Venom, Gwen Stacy and the rest of the usual suspects), I was worried that it was going to bounce all over the place.

                    Still, going out next week to see it, so we'll see where we end up; I'll try to get a review in at some point or another...
                    Twistin' by the pool.

                    Comment

                    • col5150
                      Head Fluffer
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 388

                      #11
                      i thought it started well but some points really pissed me off

                      firstly it appears the spiderman franchise is goin in the same direction as the batman one and becoming more and more cheesey with each one.

                      The harry characters storyline was crap, i thought they were gonna have him goin mad and becoming the hob goblin with crazy screams and all instead we got a lame memory loss theme and the willem dafoe flashbacks could have been so much better, then hes dead

                      Deffinately tried to fit too many stories in the one movie

                      however,i did think Topher grace was better than id expected and the schene where evil peter parker made an arse of Kirsten Dunst in the jazz club with all his spidey moves was pretty good & the chick that played Gwen Stacy was smokin hot

                      Comment

                      • Terry
                        TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 11953

                        #12
                        Funny thing is one hears so much about how much money the movie made opening weekend (although it's a little hard to flop when the flick is in 5 out of 15 theaters in any given moviehouse), but I haven't heard one person yet who said it was a great movie, or even the best movie in the series so far...

                        Thought Spiderman 2 was, in some ways, better than the first one, but am still hesitating to even bother with 3, and none of the reviews here are inspiring me to get out to go see it.
                        Scramby eggs and bacon.

                        Comment

                        • Terry
                          TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 11953

                          #13
                          Originally posted by col5150
                          i thought it started well but some points really pissed me off

                          firstly it appears the spiderman franchise is goin in the same direction as the batman one and becoming more and more cheesey with each one.

                          The harry characters storyline was crap, i thought they were gonna have him goin mad and becoming the hob goblin with crazy screams and all instead we got a lame memory loss theme and the willem dafoe flashbacks could have been so much better, then hes dead

                          Deffinately tried to fit too many stories in the one movie

                          however,i did think Topher grace was better than id expected and the schene where evil peter parker made an arse of Kirsten Dunst in the jazz club with all his spidey moves was pretty good & the chick that played Gwen Stacy was smokin hot
                          Wasn't that the whole point of the end of Spiderman 2, that Harry was gonna become the Goblin to avenge his father's death? Hard to believe they wouldn't have followed through with that setup...

                          Topher Grace is a talentless assclown.
                          Scramby eggs and bacon.

                          Comment

                          • EAT MY ASSHOLE
                            Veteran
                            • Feb 2006
                            • 1887

                            #14
                            The Harry storyline is more or less keeping with the comic version - down to the amnesia and all.

                            I wasn't bored at all, but I did leave the theater wondering what the hell that was all about.

                            Definitely the campiest in the Spidey trilogy - and thats the reaosn that its the least successful for me.
                            RIM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

                            Comment

                            • Terry
                              TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 11953

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Panamark
                              George Lucas said to the press that he thought Spiderman 3
                              was "A Silly Movie"
                              Yeah, well, least it didn't have Jar-Jar-fucking-Binks in it.

                              "Mmmm, mesa sucksa big cocksa"
                              Scramby eggs and bacon.

                              Comment

                              Working...