Bhutto Assassinated

[hideyoursheep]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Many of those [insert mideast nationality here] that love Bin Laden do so because they have a shitty existence of poverty and a complete lack of centralized gov't control, and their limited notion of democracy as one of institutionalized corruption...

FORD's view on the situation makes alot of sense and would be a
monsterous scenario should anyone been actually paying attention
to what has played out the past 6 years. It's so clear, it's disturbing.

IF she really knew whether or not UBL was killed and was herself whaked by the BCE or CIA, impeachment should be the least of the punishments handed out to these bastards.

But for some odd reason, no one seems to be interested in her claims about Usama Boogeyman Ladin.

I'm wondering about the CNN poll @ 46%- how accurate can that actually be? The fact that The National Review paints Pakistan as a stronghold for terrorists while The W praises them for their efforts
against them is sort of odd. It would appear The NR are doing the same hit job on Pakistan that BushCo were doing on Iran.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by hideyoursheep
[B

The fact that The National Review paints Pakistan as a stronghold for terrorists while The W praises them for their efforts
against them is sort of odd. . [/B]

Nah, it's actually classic BushCO.

"You're doing a heckuva job, Paki"

Bush made his bed with Perv a long time ago...

He now knows he blew it. bad.

But propping up THIS dictator in the Middle East is crucial for BushCO at this time.

The Devil you Know.........


But then again, it's really no stretch to see why Chimpy likes this Paki "Democracy"

He only wishes he could kill those who oppose him, and declare Marshal Law.

[hideyoursheep]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine


-it's really no stretch to see why Chimpy likes this Paki "Democracy"

He only wishes he could kill those who oppose him, and declare Marshal Law.

They DO have some similarities, don't they?.....




They love to play "dress-up".:p

[Steve Savicki]

Sad. Someone who died for a good cause.

[letsrock]

Did she have a nice rack?

[letsrock]

Any pics of her snizz on the net?

[hideyoursheep]

Happy Newsyear!

THIS JUST IN!!



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pwB8rFmDr6k&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pwB8rFmDr6k&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by hideyoursheep


FORD's view on the situation makes alot of sense and would be a
monsterous scenario should anyone been actually paying attention
to what has played out the past 6 years. It's so clear, it's disturbing.

IF she really knew whether or not UBL was killed and was herself whaked by the BCE or CIA, impeachment should be the least of the punishments handed out to these bastards.

But for some odd reason, no one seems to be interested in her claims about Usama Boogeyman Ladin.

I'm wondering about the CNN poll @ 46%- how accurate can that actually be? The fact that The National Review paints Pakistan as a stronghold for terrorists while The W praises them for their efforts
against them is sort of odd. It would appear The NR are doing the same hit job on Pakistan that BushCo were doing on Iran.

As far as Ford's view, that's just speculation for her death has been tied to a pro-Taliban Paki scum living in the lawless tribal territories of Waziristan, which is really where the Taliban came from - NOT Afghanistan as the Taliban are largely seen as as a foreign (Pakistani) a presence as NATO is...

And as the the Nat'l Review, well, they engage in the typical "Islamofascist" hype which is largely useless, both culturally and logically ignorant, and is a convenient excuse for simplifying or ignoring actual very complex histories that they have a part in as they pretty strongly advocated supporting the Mujahideen in the 1980s. They thusly enabled the Paki & Saudi meddling, and selective support for the most radically anti-Western groups, into the affairs of Afghanistan, which was one of the reasons the country was so unstable to begin with...

And it was of course the Bush policy which pressured Musharraf to allow Bhutto back in. Well, democracy is difficult in extremely unstable times...

[113]

Hey, I`m worried about the situation in Iran. The Iranian leader has threatened to wipe Israel off the map (meaning he is planning to nuke them when he has developed the wepons) and intends to enforce extreme muslimism on the world. Do Israel have nuclear weapons, and will they attack Iran before it develops nuclear technology? Will Israel use military force before the states are involved?

[113]

Do you guys think, George and Dick will risk bombing Iranian military installations, and possibly provoking the Russians and China into world war 3?
I think Iran will have to be forced through military action, to abandon its wepons programme!

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by 113
Hey, I`m worried about the situation in Iran. The Iranian leader has threatened to wipe Israel off the map (meaning he is planning to nuke them when he has developed the wepons) and intends to enforce extreme muslimism on the world. Do Israel have nuclear weapons, and will they attack Iran before it develops nuclear technology? Will Israel use military force before the states are involved?

Completely off topic and covered in numerous threads here.

But to answer your question, in my opinion, it's about as likely as hen's teeth biting into your ass.

Israel has about 25 to 400 small yield nuclear weapons which would turn Iran into a glass floor exhibit. And countries do not go through the expense of acquiring nuclear weapons to authenticate their anti-Semitic propaganda spouted for domestic consumption....

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by 113
Do you guys think, George and Dick will risk bombing Iranian military installations, and possibly provoking the Russians and China into world war 3?
I think Iran will have to be forced through military action, to abandon its wepons programme!

Doubtful:

http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=51624

[113]

George has accused Iran of supplying Iraq with wepons, to attack American and English soiders over recent weeks. Dick and George are now blaming the unrest in Iraq on the Iranians. They have issued many warnings to the republican guard and Iranian Leader over the last few weeks! George has said he does not want to go down in history, as the man who allowed an unstable country like Iran, to develop Nuclear wepons, before he leaves office in 2009.

[Nickdfresh]

He has and they probably have to some extent. However, the Iranian elite Revolutionary Guard "Quds Force" are often undisciplined renegades that may not always answer directly to the Iranian gov't. So no one really knows if this is offical policy or gunrunners and renegade military units just making money...

In any case, Bush has little recourse because the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) has stated that the Iranians have basically stopped their Nuke program...

[letsrock]

Iran wont be an issue. it never was. George just wants to fight everyone.

Do you remember before 9-11-2001. What the big deal was?

C'mon think about it.

It was Georges first year in Office.

here it is. this guy from the start has just wanted to kill Americans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S.-China_Spy_Plane_Incident