Sanders 2016!!

[FORD]

credit unions have similar fee restrictions as most banks with atms. use a chase atm with a chase card, no fee. and the retail locations still charge the fee with your desert schools credit union card.

Up here in Cascadia, you can pretty much take a credit union card to their own machines or any other credit union's ATM and use it with no fees. 2/3 of them even take deposits, which is convenient when the closest physical branch of your CU is way on the other end of town. If they do things differently in AZ now, it must be a local thing (I'll blame Joe Arpaio just for the Hell of it)

As far as Chase goes, I avoid that corporation like I avoid Van Hagar cheese ballads, but I'm not surprised if they stopped charging fees on their own machines as a way of attracting business. And the retail corporations might be charging fees on their own, regardless of which card. But it's still pain in the ass fees that add up to somebody pocketing a shit load of money for doing nothing, really.

[FORD]

[DONNIEP]

somebody pocketing a shit load of money for doing nothing, really.

So do all the welfare abusers in this country that the democrats and liberals continue to fund. But then again corporations can't vote.

[FORD]

Corporations don't need to vote. They just buy the politicians directly. Or thanks to Shittizens United (and its sequels) get to pick the candidates (usually two Republicans, one fraudulently calling themselves a "Democrat") that you "choose" to vote for.

[DONNIEP]

Corporations don't need to vote. They just buy the politicians directly. Or thanks to Shittizens United (and its sequels) get to pick the candidates (usually two Republicans, one fraudulently calling themselves a "Democrat") that you "choose" to vote for.

Well since the corporations choose the candidates and the Bilderbergers choose who's going to be elected, why do the democrats keep throwing money at generational welfare abusers? I mean, if they don't need their votes then who cares if they actually have to - gasp - go out and get a job.

[FORD]

Well, wouldn't the best solution for that to be to elect a candidate who doesn't answer to the Bilderbergers and who will implement FDR style programs to ensure that anybody who needs a job can get one?

[PETE'S BROTHER]

Trannys!!!!!

[FORD]

Trannys!!!!!

If you insist.....

[PETE'S BROTHER]

[vandeleur]

Great more framing shiiiiiiite

[Seshmeister]

I don't know how they work out that score but anything that puts Romney ahead isn't nice.

[DONNIEP]

Well, wouldn't the best solution for that to be to elect a candidate who doesn't answer to the Bilderbergers and who will implement FDR style programs to ensure that anybody who needs a job can get one?

No. I want a big damn wall, I want more guns, and I want America to kick some ass!!

[FORD]

I don't know how they work out that score but anything that puts Romney ahead isn't nice.

Yeah, that's definitely the weird thing about that graphic. I know Barry lost a lot of votes in 2012 (mine included) but I don't see how Mittens had a higher favorability rating than him at all

[FORD]

The PUMAs are really pissed off about this one......

[Kristy]

Great. Not like Hollywood has told other women how to vote before.

FORD You're such a:


And a Nazi


And A liar


Apologize.