POSTED 8:30 p.m. EDT; UPDATED 8:41 p.m. EDT, July 22, 2005
JETS FACING REALITY ON PENNINGTON
A league source tells us that the New York Jets quietly are becoming resigned to the looming-and-growing possibility that quarterback Chad Pennington won't be ready to play on opening day.
If Pennington can't go, the ball will fall to (gulp) Jay Fiedler.
Pennington had offseason shoulder surgery to repair a partially torn rotator cuff in his throwing arm. After the 2004 season ended, the Jets conceded that they had spoken with forked tongue about the severity of Pennington's injury.
Earlier this week, the Jets acknowledged that Pennington will be limited in training camp. Coupled with an offseason in which he took no practice reps, Pennington will have a loooong way to go in order to get acclimated to new offensive coordinator Mike Heimerdinger's system.
We're also hearing that some folks around the league are surprised that the typically tough New York media hasn't been harder on the Jets for lying about Pennington's condition. Moreover, we wonder whether the Big Apple scribes will regard with skepticism future statements from the team regarding any player's health.
Why, you aks, would a team tell tales about a quarterback's physical condition? The obvious reason is that the team doesn't want opposing defenses to target with even more zeal potential problem areas on the signal-caller's body. The more subtle reason, especially in the waning days of the offseason, is that the team doesn't want to disrupt the wave of good feelings from the fan base, which often is manifested by high sales of tickets, shirts, hats, and anything else with the official logo on it.
In New York, optimism is high. Too high. In our view, a splash of cold water could serve the Jets well, since even if Pennington is ready to go on opening day the franchise will be hard pressed to replicate its performance in 2004.
T.O. CAVES
In a stunning move, T.O. says that he plans to report to Eagles training camp.
But he won't be happy. (Hey, Terrell, no one is happy at training camp.)
"I'll be there," Owens told The Philadelphia Inquirer on Friday. "I mean, the bottom line is that I still believe I deserve a new contract. I still believe I deserve more than what they've given me. But I'm not stupid. I'm not about to miss training camp, get fined every day and give them even more reasons to keep from paying me.
"I'll be there but I won't be happy, I can tell you that much. Take from that whatever you want," he said.
ESPN.com, however, hints at the beginnings of a possible rift between Owens and agent Drew Rosenhaus. During a taping of ESPN's NFL Live, Rosenhaus says that Owens' words are "not definitive."
Translation -- "T.O. might change his mind after I tell him to."
Owens' reversal comes only one day after he said he'd welcome a trade out of Philly, which comments were made in response to Eagles president Joe Banner's statement that Owens and Rosenhaus "don't think in common-sense terms."
It appears to us that T.O. found himself in the throes of a common sense enema, which possibly happened after he started tallying up the potential costs of a holdout that stretches into the regular season. (Maybe Owens had a talk with Rosenhaus client Mike McKenzie, whose violation of his contract with the Packers in 2004 cost him more than $500,000, got him traded to New Orleans, but still didn't get him a new contract.)
For Rosenhaus, who doesn't get paid a dime for his representation of Owens until he lands a new contract, the question of whether T.O. holds out is a matter of Drew's guts and Owens' coin. Rosenhaus knows that the chances of getting a new contract diminish if T.O. honors the existing deal. Even if the team opts in 2006 to pick up $7.5 million in option and roster boni, Rosenhaus will see none of it.
If, on the other hand, Rosenhaus finagles a new deal or so alienates the team from T.O. that he gets cut after 2005, Rosenhaus gets his fee.
And the possibility that T.O. and Rosenhaus might not be seeing eye-to-eye on whether owns should cave makes us wonder what might happen if Owens wakes up one day and concludes that Rosenhaus is the root of the receiver's deep-and-growing P.R. problem in Philly. It's no secret that there's a prevailing belief in agent circles that Rosenhaus pilfers clients by recruiting them when they are under contract with other agents. Rosenhaus vehemently denies the charges, and as a practical matter it's impossible to prove that tortious interference occurred if the player doesn't stand up and say so.
With T.O., it's possible that Drew has finally gotten his hooks into a guy who could upset the apple cart. If, as one reader astutley pointed out to us in an e-mail onf Friday, Rosenhaus actually lured Owens away from David Joseph by promising a new contract, what's stopping Owens from standing up and saying so?
For a guy like Owens, who never accepts responsibility for the consequences of his own actions, it's hardly a stretch to conclude that, in order to repair his image, he'll blame the whole thing on Drew, painting himself along the way as, once again, the victim.
HUYGHUE DENIES PACMAN RUMOR
On Thursday night, we posted in this space a story regarding a rumored investigation in Atlanta regarding a potential fresh incident involving Titans rookie cornerback Pacman Jones. In fairness to Jones, we explained that Jones' agent, Michael Huyghue, had told the Titans that Jones has been in Jacksonville, not Atlanta, which would seem to be a fairly solid alibi, to say the least.
In an e-mail sent to us on Friday afternoon by one of his assistants, Huyghue says that the rumors of a new investigation are "false."
As we see it, there either is or their isn't an investigation. For now, we'll accept Huyghue's position -- but we'll continue to keep our ears open.
Comment