Skins - Seahawks III

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • knuckleboner
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    • Jan 2004
    • 2927

    Skins - Seahawks III

    ok, asshole, you might've gotten the better of this the last 2 times, but that's all in the past. this time, we've got RGIII for skins-seahawks III. so, you game for wager III?...
  • Romeo Delight
    ROCKSTAR

    • Feb 2005
    • 5172

    #2
    Hawks are taking this
    sigpicRoth Army Canada

    Comment

    • Kristy
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Aug 2004
      • 16728

      #3
      Both teams basically suck but the Hawks play dirty so they'll win on thuggery alone.

      Comment

      • Fairwrning
        TOASTMASTER GENERAL
        • Jan 2004
        • 11371

        #4
        I gotta go Seattle...Wilson is better than Griffin..Hawks just need to stop Morris and no way Skins win..

        Comment

        • knuckleboner
          Crazy Ass Mofo
          • Jan 2004
          • 2927

          #5
          Originally posted by Fairwrning
          I gotta go Seattle...Wilson is better than Griffin..Hawks just need to stop Morris and no way Skins win..
          griffin's stats are better than wilson's across the board. without the rushing. though, any team would be happy to have wilson.

          and seattle's gotta play with the 12th man sitting at home. so i'll take my chances.

          Lounge, where you at???

          Comment

          • Romeo Delight
            ROCKSTAR

            • Feb 2005
            • 5172

            #6
            Seattle's D is very good, but they are bulit more for speed versus fighting it in the trenches.

            They hit hard, but are smaller. Seattle was 8-0 at home...pretty impressive. They also had some good road wins.
            sigpicRoth Army Canada

            Comment

            • knuckleboner
              Crazy Ass Mofo
              • Jan 2004
              • 2927

              #7
              i would've liked to see a healthy RG3, but that's not the NFL. seahawks are definitely a quality team. at 14-0, i knew 14 points was not enough to win the game. and it wasn't. not by a longshot...

              Comment

              • High Life Man
                Commando
                • Jan 2004
                • 1286

                #8
                Originally posted by Romeo Delight
                Seattle's D is very good, but they are bulit more for speed versus fighting it in the trenches.

                They hit hard, but are smaller. Seattle was 8-0 at home...pretty impressive. They also had some good road wins.
                8 - 0*

                That "win" against the Packers was bullshit.

                Comment

                Working...