rolling stone on queen

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flappo
    Banned
    • Jan 2004
    • 8223

    rolling stone on queen

    Excessive, decadent, theatrical, androgynous, tasteless, mocking, ironic, self-conscious: Queen lived up to its moniker with gleeful abandon. It could only have happened in the '70s. In fact, the British quar-tet's popularity in the States plummeted immediately after the career peak of 1980's The Game. With good reason, too; the font of crafty hooks suddenly dried up. But in the group's prime, guitarist Brian May and irrepressible lead singer Freddie Mercury provided a steady flow of bombastically catchy schlock-rock hits. Although the albums drag with mediocre filler that sinks the group far below the level of, say, Led Zeppelin in terms of overall achievement, the triumphant pomp of Queen's biggest hits -- "Another One Bites the Dust," "We Are the Champions," "Bohemian Rhapsody" -- eclipses the copious weak material. Mercury stands apart as a sexual sphinx in the decade of not-entirely-liberated excess: A gay man who lived out the classic straight-male fantasy of leading a rock band, he paraded his sexuality before millions -- it remained unspoken, an open secret -- and though stricken with AIDS, he did not publicly admit to having the disease until the day before his death, in late 1991.

    The group began as a somewhat crude glam-metal outfit with arty underpinnings. Gradually, the members' college degrees and musical chops emerged. On Sheer Heart Attack, "Killer Queen" and "Stone Cold Crazy" weld Mercury's creamy falsetto strut to propulsive, tightly wound arrangements. You can get winded just listening to all those multitracked Freddies singing rings around each other. That's nothing compared to "Bohemian Rhapsody," of course: The notorious six-minute centerpiece of A Night at the Opera is either a prog-rock benchmark or the most convoluted novelty song ever recorded. The over-the-top approach is precisely what makes Mercury and company so endearing, but it's also responsible for Queen's downfall. A little too predictable, A Day at the Races is a quickie sequel to A Night at the Opera. News of the World sports two songs that have become so popular, they've transcended mere chart success to reign eternally as ubiquitous anthems: the jackboot jock-rock pomp stomp of "We Will Rock You" (written by May) and the ultimate gloat, "We Are the Champions" (by Mercury), heard around the world at sports stadiums and wherever else thousands of people gather for some form of gladiatorial combat.

    The decline starts with Jazz, which has the quickie operetta "Bicycle Races" but is otherwise utter jive. The Game offers two more megahits, of dubious achievement for the band: "Another One Bites the Dust" (credited to bassist Roger Deacon), a shameless rip-off of Chic's "Good Times" and "Crazy Little Thing Called Love," a bit of pseudo-rockabilly hokum that introduces an ominous new element to the Queen mix: nostalgia.

    From this point forward, Queen's output seems neutered and obsessed with gloss, whether with outright nostalgic projects (the tuneless Flash Gordon soundtrack) or albums that exhibit the hollow glamour of the times (Hot Space, The Works); the only track from this period that has any life at all is "Under Pressure," an impromptu collaboration with David Bowie. Mercury began to suffer from AIDS during this period, and everything from A Kind of Magic on was driven by an unspecified philosophy promoting all races, creeds, etc. ("One Vision," "The Miracle"). He was on this trip until his death, as evidenced by the posthumous Made in Heaven -- for which he recorded vocal tracks to be finished later by the band -- and we can only hope the project brought him peace. Though not the band's best work, the earnest, joyful later albums remain poignant as an epitaph for Mercury.

    After the film Wayne's World made "Bohemian Rhapsody" a #2 hit in 1992, the band's new label, Hollywood, rushed a hits collection into the stores: Classic Queen omits "We Will Rock You," "Another One Bites the Dust," "Killer Queen," and a half-dozen other essentials; Greatest Hits offers these tracks but does not include "Bohemian Rhapsody," "Under Pressure," and others that were on Classic Queen. The double Greatest Hits, Vols. 1 and 2 corrects the oversight, though many of the inclusions weren't U.S. hits ("Breakthru," "Headlong," "I Want to Break Free"). Greatest Hits III is a junkyard of rarities, remixes, and solo tracks, valuable mostly for Mercury's ingenious cover of "The Great Pretender." Greatest Hits I, II, and III is a rather expensive doorstop, and Rocks, a decent collection of '70s classics, gets docked half a star for sloppy editing. The BBC set, eight tracks recorded in two sessions in 1973, is an intriguing glimpse of the band just before the release of its first album; clearly excited yet delicately precise about every move, Queen appears almost fully formed as rock's most dramatic perfectionists. (MARK COLEMAN/BEN SISARIO)

    too funny

    that magazine is so shit that even my cat won't use it in his litter tray

    hey , even animals have standards
  • flappo
    Banned
    • Jan 2004
    • 8223

    #2
    The over-the-top approach is precisely what makes Mercury and company so endearing, but it's also responsible for Queen's downfall.

    yeah , 200 million+ fucking records sales , being voted number 1 live act of all time for their seminal live aid performance and top british band in a bbc poll just last month ahead of the beatles and the stones

    queen REALLY fucked up

    uhuhuh

    Comment

    • flappo
      Banned
      • Jan 2004
      • 8223

      #3
      but at least they did their homework

      "Roger Deacon"



      eddie put it pretty well

      'fuck the critics!'

      nuff said

      Comment

      • Coyote
        ROTH ARMY SUPREME
        • Jan 2004
        • 8185

        #4
        Rolling Stone: a group of failed musicians shitting on real music, whilst wanking over some recently dead "unknown legend of the week".


        Fuck 'em, and the cunts who gave 'em that job.
        Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

        Originally posted by Seshmeister
        It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 59598

          #5
          I'll have to agree with them on one point.....

          Queen just wasn't as good in the 80's. At least not their records. They were great as ever live, of course.

          But this IS Rolling Stone we're talking about. They NEVER gave a good review to a Van HALEN album and never put them on the cover of the magazine, but somehow managed to get Van Hagar a flaming gay photo shoot before they even released "51fistme".
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • Diamondjimi
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • May 2004
            • 12086

            #6
            Originally posted by Coyote
            Rolling Stone: a group of failed musicians shitting on real music, whilst wanking over some recently dead "unknown legend of the week".
            Agree totally. Sure while most of Queens music of the 80's lacked . They still had more cred. than 98% of the shite that rag gloated over. Whenever I see that editor Fricke or whatever his name is on tv,I want to smash his fuckin face with a ball-peen hammer. They turn their nose up at great bands like CVH ,Floyd,and Queen and fawn over useless cunts like Patty Smith and Lou Reed.

            FUCK ROLLING STONE !
            Trolls take heed...LOG OUT & FUCK OFF!!!

            Comment

            • Terry
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Jan 2004
              • 12123

              #7
              It's Rolling Stone.

              With the exception of a few feature articles here and there, I had no use for that magazine after about 1984. The mid 1980s is when they started printing long, in depth articles on such artists as Madonna, Michael J. Fox and the like. And now they've got Justin Timberlake on the cover every other issue in a desperate bid to try and stay relevant to the under-20 demo. This, plus their continual fawning over washed-up hippies like Clapton (where every new album he puts out is 'the best he's done since Derek and the Dominoes') and the Strolling Bones, has taken a magazine that was THE standard bearer of rock journalism in the 1970s and early 1980s and steadily flushed it down the toilet over the last 20+ years.

              Fuck 'em. Especially that decrepit Age of Aquarius tailgunning boo foo of an editor Wenner. He and Lorne Michaels are the epitome of a couple of washed-up has-beens flogging a dead horse. Fuck Rolling Stone, SNL and all the cunts who still subscribe to and watch that shit on a weekly basis.

              And fuck Sting, too. And Bono. Not for anything to do with anything discussed above, but just in general. Pompous twits.
              Scramby eggs and bacon.

              Comment

              • Diamondjimi
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • May 2004
                • 12086

                #8
                Originally posted by Terry
                It's Rolling Stone.

                This, plus their continual fawning over washed-up hippies like Clapton (where every new album he puts out is 'the best he's done since Derek and the Dominoes') and the Strolling Bones, has taken a magazine that was THE standard bearer of rock journalism in the 1970s and early 1980s and steadily flushed it down the toilet over the last 20+ years.

                Fuck 'em. Especially that decrepit Age of Aquarius tailgunning boo foo of an editor Wenner. He and Lorne Michaels are the epitome of a couple of washed-up has-beens flogging a dead horse. Fuck Rolling Stone, SNL and all the cunts who still subscribe to and watch that shit on a weekly basis.

                And fuck Sting, too. And Bono. Not for anything to do with anything discussed above, but just in general. Pompous twits.


                You forgot FUCK P DIDDY ! :D
                Trolls take heed...LOG OUT & FUCK OFF!!!

                Comment

                • FORD
                  ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                  • Jan 2004
                  • 59598

                  #9
                  I think Terry's having a bad Monday. He sounds like he hates everyone today!
                  Eat Us And Smile

                  Cenk For America 2024!!

                  Justice Democrats


                  "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                  Comment

                  • binnie
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • May 2006
                    • 19145

                    #10
                    I have to say that Queen are one band that have never appealed to me, I just don't get it.

                    That being said Rolling Stone, and most other music mags, have some of the most off-the-wall critieria for what constitutes "good" music...
                    The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

                    Comment

                    • Bill Lumbergh
                      ROCKSTAR

                      • Mar 2004
                      • 5472

                      #11
                      Their first 7 albums are untouchable IMO.........

                      Comment

                      • Golden AWe
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 34245

                        #12
                        They still made grate records in the 80's

                        Some of them, like "Kind of Magic" were overproduced but still sounded amazing live

                        "One vision", the live version, 'nuff said
                        Originally posted by Cato
                        Golden, why are you FAT?
                        Originally posted by lesfunk
                        Much like yourself as the Jim Morrison of Nazi bunker flies
                        http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u...TheDMCross.jpg

                        Comment

                        • flappo
                          Banned
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 8223

                          #13
                          it gets worse



                          they show vh 2

                          but it's a review of vh 3

                          silly cunts

                          Comment

                          • BITEYOASS
                            ROTH ARMY ELITE
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 6530

                            #14
                            You gotta remember, Rolling Stone is a magazine who prides itself on sticking their toungue as far up Bob Dylan's ass as possible. :D

                            Comment

                            • Diamondjimi
                              DIAMOND STATUS
                              • May 2004
                              • 12086

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Golden AWe
                              They still made grate records in the 80's

                              Some of them, like "Kind of Magic" were overproduced but still sounded amazing live

                              "One vision", the live version, 'nuff said
                              Agreed. Some of their 80's was decent enough for the stage.
                              But Body Language ?.......reeked of gayness !
                              Trolls take heed...LOG OUT & FUCK OFF!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...