Peterson Jury Hung??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fabulous Shadow

    Peterson Jury Hung??

    REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - In a sign of possible discord in the jury room, the judge in Scott Peterson's murder case lectured the panel Monday about the importance of deliberating with an open mind.

    "Do not hesitate to change your opinion for the purpose of reaching a verdict if you can do so," Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said after summoning jurors to the courtroom just an hour and half after they resumed deliberations.

    "The attitude and conduct of jurors at all times is very important," he added. "It is rarely helpful for a juror at the beginning of deliberations to express an emphatic opinion on the case."

    The jurors listened with serious, even grim expressions before they were sent back into the jury room to deliberate.

    It was not immediately clear what led to the judge's instructions, but trial observers speculated jurors are beginning to reach a deadlock.

    "They're stuck," said Jim Hammer, a former prosecutor and trial regular. The judge "clearly has indications that they're beginning to hang."

    Earlier Monday, Delucchi denied a defense motion for a mistrial after jurors examined the boat prosecutors claim Peterson used to dispose of his wife's body.

    Defense lawyer Mark Geragos claimed jurors violated the judge's orders by doing "a juror experiment" when several panelists got inside the boat and rocked it from side to side.

    The defense has argued that it would have been nearly impossible for Peterson to have heaved his wife's 153-pound body over the edge of the boat without tipping.

    As an alternative to a mistrial, Geragos asked the judge to show jurors a videotaped experiment performed by the defense apparently showing that the boat would have tipped. Delucchi denied the motion.

    Peterson is charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and the fetus she carried. Prosecutors claim Peterson killed Laci around Dec. 24, 2002, then sunk her weighted body in the bay.

    Defense lawyers claim someone else abducted Laci and killed her, then framed her husband.

    The sequestered jury began deliberations Wednesday and recessed for the weekend. Jurors were monitored in a hotel where they could watch only sports and movies on television, and could use a computer without access to the Internet. They were forbidden from discussing the case.

    Jurors have two choices should they decide to convict Peterson - first- or second-degree murder. First-degree convictions, carrying the death penalty of life without parole, would mean jurors believe Peterson planned the killings in advance. Second-degree murder convictions don't require a finding of premeditation, and carry sentences of 15-years-to-life for each count.

    Also Monday, the presiding judge of the courthouse ruled against media attorneys who were seeking to have cameras stationed about 40 feet down a hallway from the courtroom. Last week, Delucchi banned television and still cameras from the courtroom for the verdict, but said he would allow a live audio broadcast.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • twonabomber
    formerly F A T
    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

    • Jan 2004
    • 11300

    #2
    i'm telling you, he's gonna walk.
    Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

    Comment

    • Brett
      Full Member Status

      • Jan 2004
      • 3538

      #3
      I'm with you twona, he's so gonna walk...just like fucking OJ.

      Comment

      • Fabulous Shadow

        #4
        How would Peterson have got Lacis body into that boat and dumped it without anyone seeing him? Covered in a blue tarp? Like that isn't obvious...

        Comment

        • BITEYOASS
          ROTH ARMY ELITE
          • Jan 2004
          • 6530

          #5
          If he does walkout, then he has to watch out for psycho vigilantees with nothing to lose.

          Comment

          • Fabulous Shadow

            #6
            OJ didn't...

            Comment

            • Brett
              Full Member Status

              • Jan 2004
              • 3538

              #7
              OJ didn't what? Decapitate two people? So what exactly is the rationality for finding his DNA all over the crime scene and the bodies? He's a murderer and so is Scott Petersen, come on now.

              No one will do anything to Petersen if he walks, nobody's ever done anything to OJ.

              Comment

              • Brett
                Full Member Status

                • Jan 2004
                • 3538

                #8
                Originally posted by Fabulous Shadow
                How would Peterson have got Lacis body into that boat and dumped it without anyone seeing him? Covered in a blue tarp? Like that isn't obvious...
                Who knows, he probably cut her up in pieces. And doesn't seem like anybody saw him either way. Even if the evidence isn't all that great (seems good enoigh to convict him to me), he's guilty. Even if he gets off, he's still guilty. He had the MO, and he certainly had the means to carry it out. Guilty, guilty, guilty. There is absolutely no evidence suggesting anyone else did it.

                Maybe after he gets off, Petersen can help OJ find the real killers. :p
                Last edited by Brett; 11-08-2004, 08:02 PM.

                Comment

                • Roth & Roll
                  Foot Soldier
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 727

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Brett
                  OJ didn't what? Decapitate two people? So what exactly is the rationality for finding his DNA all over the crime scene and the bodies? He's a murderer and so is Scott Petersen, come on now.

                  No one will do anything to Petersen if he walks, nobody's ever done anything to OJ.
                  I don't think that's what FAB meant. I think she's referring to the fact that no vigilantes hunted down OJ after he was acquitted.

                  What does one have to do to get busted for murder in California anyway?

                  http://i1110.photobucket.com/albums/...oker-small.jpg

                  Comment

                  • Rikk
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 16518

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Brett
                    OJ didn't what? Decapitate two people? So what exactly is the rationality for finding his DNA all over the crime scene and the bodies? He's a murderer and so is Scott Petersen, come on now.

                    No one will do anything to Petersen if he walks, nobody's ever done anything to OJ.
                    OJ did it. One listen to the Bronco chase phone call tapes (OJ talking to Vanatter) will convince you of that. He goes on about how he doesn't deserve to live and poor Nicole. Dude practically admits his guilt several times on that tape. And the prosecution didn't end up entering it into evidence, even though it would have got in.
                    Roth Army Militia

                    Originally posted by WARF
                    Rikk - The new school of the Roth Army... this dude leads the pack... three words... The Sheep Pen... this dude opened alot of doors for people during this new era... he's the best of the new school.

                    Comment

                    • Brett
                      Full Member Status

                      • Jan 2004
                      • 3538

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Roth & Roll
                      I don't think that's what FAB meant. I think she's referring to the fact that no vigilantes hunted down OJ after he was acquitted.

                      What does one have to do to get busted for murder in California anyway?

                      Who the hell in their right mind would want to spend the rest of their lives in jail to kill two tools like OJ and Scott Petersen? Won't happen.

                      Dude maybe they'll get Robert Blake, one last shot.

                      Comment

                      • Fabulous Shadow

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Roth & Roll
                        I don't think that's what FAB meant. I think she's referring to the fact that no vigilantes hunted down OJ after he was acquitted.

                        What does one have to do to get busted for murder in California anyway?

                        that IS what I meant R&R.

                        I think to be convicted in Cali there has to be hard evidence. Witness, DNA, Confession, Murder Weapon. Californians would rather let a guilty person go free than send an innocent one to prison.

                        Comment

                        • Fabulous Shadow

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Rikk
                          OJ did it. One listen to the Bronco chase phone call tapes (OJ talking to Vanatter) will convince you of that. He goes on about how he doesn't deserve to live and poor Nicole. Dude practically admits his guilt several times on that tape. And the prosecution didn't end up entering it into evidence, even though it would have got in.
                          I agree that OJ did it NOW but in the beginning I just didn't want to believe that a man who once loved a woman enought to marry her and have children with her could do such a thing to her in the long run. Sorry, but I want to believe in the fairy tale.

                          Comment

                          • Fabulous Shadow

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Brett
                            Who knows, he probably cut her up in pieces. And doesn't seem like anybody saw him either way.
                            That's why there was so much BLOOD evidence...

                            Comment

                            • twonabomber
                              formerly F A T
                              ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                              • Jan 2004
                              • 11300

                              #15
                              they never said Laci was cut up, did they?
                              Writing In All Proper Case Takes Extra Time, Is Confusing To Read, And Is Completely Pointless.

                              Comment

                              Working...