JACKO: Innocent or guilty?

[Mr Badguy]

PYT or Pretty young thing from Thriller.

Makes you wonder about his inspiration for that song.

[Little Texan]

Originally posted by Mr Badguy
PYT or Pretty young thing from Thriller.

Makes you wonder about his inspiration for that song.

Webster?

[Steve Savicki]

I voted "Slightly less guilty!" because we don't know if he really molested the kid or not.
He IS guilty of having the kid sleep in his bed which I understand Jacko admits to doing. That is wrong.
Still, it's the kid's parent's responsibility to be concerned for their child... "Why isn't he back home now?"
Jackson may not have actually had sex with the kid; that's up for the jury to decide.
Until then, I only accuse him of just allowing the kid to share his bed.

Like Vili Fualaau,

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/71277_vili21.shtml

this could just be a family's attempt to steal Jackson's fortune.

[Figs]

Why am I calling you by your first names? I don't even know you. I still call my boss "Mister", and I've been working for him for seven years, but all of a sudden I walk in here and I'm calling you Rick and Sheila like we're in some kind of AA meeting. . .I don't want to be your buddy, Rick. I just want some breakfast.

[bueno bob]

If he's innocent, I don't jack off. :D

[WACF]

Don't know if he is guilty or not.

I do know he must truly hate himself...all that surgery and he can't decide when to stop.

He is no doubt different than anyone else.
I hope he did not do it...

[Switch84]

I don't know! And noone else here knows, either. So quick to judge, and you don't know SHIT!

The next time any of you are facing a conviction, think about how lucky you are not to be judged by retards on a message board that hasn't seen one iota of evidence and aren't members of your jury.

The only thing I know FOR SURE is that he doesn't make things easier on himself by making it easy to file these kind of charges against him.

[Mr Badguy]

Originally posted by Switch84
I don't know! And noone else here knows, either. So quick to judge, and you don't know SHIT!

The next time any of you are facing a conviction, think about how lucky you are not to be judged by retards on a message board that hasn't seen one iota of evidence and aren't members of your jury.

The only thing I know FOR SURE is that he doesn't make things easier on himself by making it easy to file these kind of charges against him.

So do we take that as "Not guilty"?

Sorry to offend you, dude, but everyone has opinions on this kind of stuff, whether it be Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Gary Glitter or whoever.

It`s called gossip.

Besides, one of us "retards" could be called up to be on the jury.

It`s not outside the realms of possibility.

[secrets]

Of course he's guilty as sin. Only reason he's never been properly convicted is because of his money.

[Panamark]

Guilty.

And I think it will come out in the wash, or some palms will
be heavily greased, yet again..

I remember seeing an interview with La Toya, not long
after the first kid he paid silence money too..
She basically said that she had warned him so many times
to stop his relationships with kids.

Now thats coming from the family !!

They all know.

The LAPD have on file, descriptions of MJ's cock
from underage boys. He had to get his cock photographed.
HELLO !!!! Any warning bells ringing yet ??????

However,

I really believe he thinks he is doing nothing wrong, and
that the children love him, no matter what he does with them.

And if its love, hey it cant be wrong ??

The dude needs help.

[Switch84]

Originally posted by Mr Badguy
So do we take that as "Not guilty"?

Sorry to offend you, dude, but everyone has opinions on this kind of stuff, whether it be Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Gary Glitter or whoever.

It`s called gossip.

Besides, one of us "retards" could be called up to be on the jury.

It`s not outside the realms of possibility.

This isn't 'gossip', Girlfriend. This is a real case with a real person facing some real time. The proper term is 'speculation', ya dig?

My answer is I DON'T KNOW, because I don't. I haven't seen the evidence in question, talked to any witnesses, or Mr. Jackson.

I'm sure his lawyers are skilled enough to eliminate potential 'jurors' with preconceived prejudices.