Tweet
You're still doing it...
-
-
No, just pointing out the obvious.....the stuff you may not recall posting, being in a drug induced blackout
Originally posted by vandeleurE- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place
Comment
-
Well, that is just meaningless.
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
Exactly, do you know that some of your posts are impossible to decipher...seems like the later in the evening it gets, the more indecipherable your posts are.
Whatever drugs you're taking, you might want to tweak down the dosage as the day progresses
Originally posted by vandeleurE- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first placeComment
-
And then she does a cut 'n paste that makes sense and trys to pass it off as her own...Comment
-
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
Reality is therefore pure existence, but an existence which manifests itself in different modes, and it is these modes which present themselves in the mind as quiddities. Even the term 'in the mind', however, is merely an expression denoting a particular mode of being, that of mental existence (al-wujud al-dhihni), albeit an extremely attenuated mode. Everything is thus comprehended by existence, even 'nothingness', which must on being conceived assume the most meagre portion of existence in order to become a mental existent. When reality (or rather a mode of existence) presents itself to the mind, the mind abstracts a quiddity from it - being unable, except in exceptional circumstances, to grasp existence intuitively - and in the mind the quiddity becomes, as it were, the reality and existence the accident. However, this 'existence' which the mind predicates of the quiddity is itself merely a notion or concept, one of the secondary intelligibles. It is this which is the most universal and most self-evident concept to which the Aristotelians referred, and which al-Suhrawardi regarded as univocal. But in reality there are not two 'things', existence and quiddity, only existence - not the concept, but the reality - and so 'existence' cannot be regarded as a real attribute of quiddity; for if this were possible quiddity would have to be regarded as already existent
This one might stump you Elvis.
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
Whatever you say, Boss.
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
It doesn't stump me, and I know you didn't write it. I know how you write. You cannot punctuate. You cannot spell. You leave out words. You usually have no point. You cannot stay on topic. You post smilies when you know you cannot respond with something that applies to the topic at hand, or you post YouTube clips...
need I go on ??
You're a mental case...
Comment
-
Reality is therefore pure existence, but an existence which manifests itself in different modes, and it is these modes which present themselves in the mind as quiddities. Even the term 'in the mind', however, is merely an expression denoting a particular mode of being, that of mental existence (al-wujud al-dhihni), albeit an extremely attenuated mode. Everything is thus comprehended by existence, even 'nothingness', which must on being conceived assume the most meagre portion of existence in order to become a mental existent. When reality (or rather a mode of existence) presents itself to the mind, the mind abstracts a quiddity from it - being unable, except in exceptional circumstances, to grasp existence intuitively - and in the mind the quiddity becomes, as it were, the reality and existence the accident. However, this 'existence' which the mind predicates of the quiddity is itself merely a notion or concept, one of the secondary intelligibles. It is this which is the most universal and most self-evident concept to which the Aristotelians referred, and which al-Suhrawardi regarded as univocal. But in reality there are not two 'things', existence and quiddity, only existence - not the concept, but the reality - and so 'existence' cannot be regarded as a real attribute of quiddity; for if this were possible quiddity would have to be regarded as already existent
This one might stump you Elvis.
Iranian Personalities: Sadr Al-Din Mohammad Shirazi
I think Elvis knows how to google too...Comment
-
ouch!Originally posted by vandeleurE- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first placeComment
-
Wow, Elvisinbetweenfuckingoffyoumanagedtolearndiscourse analysis!
:baa:MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
-
Phew...the meds are kicking in Standin
Originally posted by vandeleurE- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first placeComment
-
MICHAEL G. MULLENTo put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.Comment
Comment