Unhappy Democrats Need to Wait to Get Into Canada

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Big Train
    Full Member Status

    • Apr 2004
    • 4013

    #61
    Nick,

    Nobody wants to go to war? Your not gonna get support on it, no matter what...you think the metrosexual population is gonna go off quietly to war?

    All of this is so highly unlikely. To say something like "unexpected world event" IGNORES all other things in play (c,mon your a lib, you know the playbook-diplomacy, foreign pressure, power projections, nuclear deterrents). North Korea isn't gonna make a move on South Korea not because of us, because of China. China is up North Korea's ass about it and have more influence than they US does.

    Am I ruling it out? No. But these same disgruntled geniuses, as Ally pointed out before, had no problem gutting the military under Clinton. They are really feeling the realities of their own moves. However, they were correct originally. We are a more agile, smaller, more intense force. We rolled two countries in the same year. We will manage...

    Comment

    • scorpioboy33
      Commando
      • Jul 2004
      • 1415

      #62
      im detecting a theme here

      Comment

      • Big Train
        Full Member Status

        • Apr 2004
        • 4013

        #63
        Which is...

        Comment

        • Nickdfresh
          SUPER MODERATOR

          • Oct 2004
          • 49567

          #64
          Originally posted by Big Train
          Nick,

          Nobody wants to go to war? Your not gonna get support on it, no matter what...you think the metrosexual population is gonna go off quietly to war?

          All of this is so highly unlikely. To say something like "unexpected world event" IGNORES all other things in play (c,mon your a lib, you know the playbook-diplomacy, foreign pressure, power projections, nuclear deterrents). North Korea isn't gonna make a move on South Korea not because of us, because of China. China is up North Korea's ass about it and have more influence than they US does.

          Am I ruling it out? No. But these same disgruntled geniuses, as Ally pointed out before, had no problem gutting the military under Clinton. They are really feeling the realities of their own moves. However, they were correct originally. We are a more agile, smaller, more intense force. We rolled two countries in the same year. We will manage...
          I disagree. After 9/11 there was an influx of people of all ages that enlisted or got commissioned to slit al-Qaida/Taliban throats. Most of them didn't realize we'd be chasing phantom WMD's in Iraq and than calling it a glorious mission of liberation for the Iraqi people.

          Comment

          • Big Train
            Full Member Status

            • Apr 2004
            • 4013

            #65
            "They signed up to punch a nazi in the face" as Owen Wilson put it in Behind Enemy Lines.

            First off we did that quite well, thank you. Lots of heads were blown off, throats slit etc...we got rid of 75% of know Al-Qaeda in two weeks. Iraq was next. If you want to continue to oversimplify the WMD argument, go ahead.

            Lastly, why would they care? I'm just trying to keep up with your conflicting assumptions. Most in the military are simple minded republicans blindly following our chosen one, so WHY would they care that they are in Iraq?
            Last edited by Big Train; 11-06-2004, 01:57 PM.

            Comment

            Working...