Define the following..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Warham
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Mar 2004
    • 14589

    #16
    Originally posted by FORD
    Such as Bush vs Gore 2000?
    No, such as saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional.

    Comment

    • FORD
      ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

      • Jan 2004
      • 59656

      #17
      Originally posted by Warham
      No, such as saying that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional.
      Of course..... right wing judges would never make their own laws from the bench
      Eat Us And Smile

      Cenk For America 2024!!

      Justice Democrats


      "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

      Comment

      • Big Train
        Full Member Status

        • Apr 2004
        • 4013

        #18
        Show me where they have..

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 59656

          #19
          Originally posted by Big Train
          Show me where they have..
          I already quoted the worst example. Five Republican, BCE appointed judges stopped a legal vote count with this justification that it would "cause irreparable harm to Mr. Bush"

          Well no shit. It would keep him from stealing the election.

          So while the Felonious Florida Five stopped "irreparable harm to Mr. Bush", they caused irreparable harm to the country in the process. And I have a feeling that at least Kennedy and O'Connor regret doing so.
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • Warham
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Mar 2004
            • 14589

            #20
            Actually FORD, they stopped the Florida Supreme Court from rewriting election law from the bench. If I am correct, that was a liberal bunch if I ever saw one.

            Comment

            • Pink Spider
              Sniper
              • Jan 2004
              • 867

              #21
              Originally posted by Big Train
              2. Democrat - Their party once believed in democracy. Today their party is run by Neo-Liberals.

              Pink, what is a "Neo-Liberal"? How does this differ from a traditional liberal or a traditional Democrat?

              These responses are interesting as to our own personal interpretation of things on this board...and FORD, I was looking for personal responses, not the Webster's version. Curious how YOU think, scary as that might be...
              Neo-Liberals in my opinion, are corporate "liberals" with imperialistic tendencies. Sort of a fascist trying to take liberal beliefs to get sympathy from the real liberals. Neo-Cons and Neo-Liberals are basically the same, except for which side they're trying to pose as.

              A traditional Democrat would probably be closer to some one like Dennis Kucinich's beliefs than to those of John Kerry. A belief in as close of a democracy as possible and a belief in protecting personal liberties (which doesn't always go well with democracy) is what I would classify as being a traditional Democrat. Kerry would fit the defintion of a Neo-Liberal since he seemed to be against personal liberties, was taking a large sum of corporate money and saying that he was pro-war the entire time.

              Comment

              Working...