Originally posted by Little_Skittles
correct me if i'm wrong or just being stupid but umm didn't osama set out to rid the world of american influence maybe ya'lls should umm have a chat or two with my history teacher.
correct me if i'm wrong or just being stupid but umm didn't osama set out to rid the world of american influence maybe ya'lls should umm have a chat or two with my history teacher.
Who taught your teachers? You don't know, but I know.
And, umm, maybe if you tried, umm, er, umm, just a little bit to add some substance with your comedy trolls you'll get a respectful answer sometime.
Osama has some good ideas. The same ideas as John Kerry expressed only a couple months ago when he said, "America must remove itself from dependence on SAUDI oil [caps mine]."
I agree with Osama and John.
They just have different ways of achieving it.
Obviously, John Kerry and 50 million Americans who voted for him can't do that, get the U.S. out from under Saudi and Middle Eastern oil dependence, maybe Osama and his "19 high school graduates" or "3 or 4" of them here or there will do what John Kerry and 50 million U.S. voters couldn't do for themselves.
And when Osama does it I don't think you're going to like the way he does things as compared to the way a new President named Kerry would have done it, get off the Arab oil nipple, and 50 million Americans would have done it with him.
Instead, the great American experiment in democracy has accepted the PNAC plan of "permanent military bases," permanent killing, for Arab oil when Iran is saying to the world, in agreement with world scientists, that Iran needs to explore nuclear and other energy resources, because Iran is running out of oil.
The world's getting a bad brake when GW gets swore in for a second America destroying term.
P
Comment