Originally posted by ELVIS
Any thoughts on this particular article ??
Anyone ??
Any thoughts on this particular article ??
Anyone ??
If this article is true, then why the hell are we (the U.S.) still digging for petroleum? Why are we searching for "crumbs under the dinner table" with the other countries? Even if oil was plentiful, why would we, in our right minds, continue to use one of the most finite energy sources?
We stopped using wood in general for obvious reasons (inefficient, deforestation, etc.). We stopped using coal for the most part, for obviously good reasons. Why the hell do we continue to spend billions for it, suck up for it, despite what we so plainly know? Based upon the history of energy sources, we were due for a change in technology a while back.
The United States, a country of many pioneers, inventors and innovations, can't even mass produce alternative sources of energy to our citizens? Puhleeeze!
The belief that there are no other economically feasible ways to harness energy is ludicrous.
How desperate for oil are we? Bush first focuses his sights on Afghanistan, looking for the instigator of 9/11, promising that Osama and his comrades would be brought to justice. In the middle of his "search", he suddenly shifts his focus onto a country that had no direct connection to 9/11. He plans to take out Saddam to establish democracy, and "save" the people from tyranny.
Ok, now I'm going on a tangent....sorry. So, if GW was going to be so heroic, altruistic about his intentions, why wasn't this done for any African country, where, there, the word tyrant is a mild term? Aside from Saudi Arabia (obvious Bush ties), Iraq has the largest oil reserves in the ME. Hmmm.
The ringleader of the greatest terrorist attack on U.S. soil alive and well, despite Bush's initial plans to find him no matter what?
You do the math.
Comment