Originally posted by Seshmeister
How do you explain the debates with Kerry then.
The one I saw he was frighteningly retarded. He wouldn't make small town mayor over here.
How do you explain the debates with Kerry then.
The one I saw he was frighteningly retarded. He wouldn't make small town mayor over here.
Simple: he sticks on topic. He doesn't break out a whole bunch of facts and figures, not b/c he doesn't understand them, but b/c 60% of the viewers won't.
Think about to the 200 debates. Al Gore presented a comprehensive, detailed analysis of the direction he believed taxes and the econmy should go. Not only did it go right over most peopl'es heads, not only was it a snooze-fest, but once Bush said "Fuzzy math" (and commenced to repeat it ad-nauseum), all those people were able to say, "Hey, this guy's not talking down to me, I can relate to him, and he just proved that the other guy is wrong."
He has stuck with the same basic debate style from his days then he running for governor of Texas. It's not brilliant, it's not "presidential", but it is proven effective.
(besides, most people are already decided who they're voting for pre-debates. Generally, honestly, you have more of a chance of losing votes rather than gaining by sticking your neck out)
Comment