China Oil Company Bids $18.5B for Unocal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Warham
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Mar 2004
    • 14589

    #16
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh


    It's not just a fucking photo-op! RUMMY was screamin' for war against IRAQ.
    So Rumsfeld went to shake hands with Hussein in 1984, knowing that George W. Bush was going to attack Iraq in 2003?

    Comment

    • LoungeMachine
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Jul 2004
      • 32576

      #17
      Originally posted by Warham
      So Rumsfeld went to shake hands with Hussein in 1984, knowing that George W. Bush was going to attack Iraq in 2003?

      No, he probably figured HE'd be back to do the job himself
      Originally posted by Kristy
      Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
      Originally posted by cadaverdog
      I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

      Comment

      • Warham
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Mar 2004
        • 14589

        #18
        You'd have to believe in some kook theory (BCE) to dream up that scenario.

        Comment

        • FORD
          ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

          • Jan 2004
          • 59643

          #19
          Rummy gave Saddam chemical weapons in the 80's and he was the one who sold the North Korean Dumbass Jr. a nuclear reactor in the late 1990's.

          Now can anybody place Rummy in Iran any time in the last 20 years, that's the question.
          Eat Us And Smile

          Cenk For America 2024!!

          Justice Democrats


          "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

          Comment

          • ODShowtime
            ROCKSTAR

            • Jun 2004
            • 5812

            #20
            China berates U.S. over Unocal vote

            Wed Jul 6, 9:02 AM ET

            BEIJING (Reuters) - China criticized the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday for demanding a review of an attempted takeover of California-based oil producer Unocal Corp. by China's CNOOC Ltd.

            "We demand that the U.S. Congress correct its mistaken ways of politicizing economic and trade issues and stop interfering in the normal commercial exchanges between enterprises of two countries," the Foreign Ministry said in a faxed statement.

            The House last Thursday voted 333-92 in favor of a measure to block the Bush administration from approving CNOOC's $18.5 billion bid.

            It also passed, with an overwhelming majority, a nonbinding resolution calling on the Bush administration to immediately conduct a review of the possible takeover, noting that it could threaten U.S. national security.

            The bid by CNOOC, China's top offshore oil producer, topped a $16 billion-plus cash and stock offer that Unocal had already accepted from Chevron Corp .

            CNOOC's largest shareholder is the Chinese government.

            The Chinese firm's bid has become a complicating factor in diplomatic ties between China and the United States and comes at a sensitive time when oil prices are near record highs.

            Secretary of State
            Condoleezza Rice is scheduled to visit China on Saturday and Sunday.

            The latest news and headlines from Yahoo News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.
            gnaw on it

            Comment

            • Nickdfresh
              SUPER MODERATOR

              • Oct 2004
              • 49567

              #21
              Really, I demand that CHINA revalue its currency to reflect market value!

              Comment

              • ODShowtime
                ROCKSTAR

                • Jun 2004
                • 5812

                #22
                I know! I demand you to shut the fuck up China!
                gnaw on it

                Comment

                • FORD
                  ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                  • Jan 2004
                  • 59643

                  #23
                  What really sucks is that the only alternative to the Chinese buying UNOCAL is to let Chevron/Texaco buy them. Either way, we're fucked. We either give more economic control to a foreign superpower or more to a domestic oil monopoly. Both are bad for America, and it's too bad that DLC appeasment pussies have voted alongside Republicans to permit all this ridiculous deregulation of energy industries.
                  Eat Us And Smile

                  Cenk For America 2024!!

                  Justice Democrats


                  "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                  Comment

                  • ODShowtime
                    ROCKSTAR

                    • Jun 2004
                    • 5812

                    #24
                    Originally posted by FORD
                    What really sucks is that the only alternative to the Chinese buying UNOCAL is to let Chevron/Texaco buy them. Either way, we're fucked. We either give more economic control to a foreign superpower or more to a domestic oil monopoly. Both are bad for America, and it's too bad that DLC appeasment pussies have voted alongside Republicans to permit all this ridiculous deregulation of energy industries.
                    Well you sure paint a rosy picture here. I guess it's not your fault reality stinks.
                    gnaw on it

                    Comment

                    • Big Train
                      Full Member Status

                      • Apr 2004
                      • 4013

                      #25
                      So who, Stalin, should be given control of this company? China is the highest bidder. Chevron is the best move to make, although a lower bid. Nobody else could pony up the dough or expertise in the oil business. It's run by a few players cuz it's a tough and mature business in a late stage of it's development.

                      Should we just give it to some upstart Berkley company who promises to be sensible? I KNOW your gonna say yes...

                      Comment

                      Working...