[size=3][b]London Attacked![/b][/size]

[thome]

Neo con is a derogatory slang term use by some one to insult
his supposed opponent .Much like a cuss word used to free
up the user from having any real answers to the situation or
discusion.It has no meaning its invented meaning is used to
justify the existance of the NON Word much like, Nigg@R.


Weres MY FIVE..... LIBBEY- CON MAN

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by thome
Neo con is a derogatory slang term use by some one to insult
his supposed opponent .Much like a cuss word

The word "neocon" earned its bad connotation by being associated with lying and warmongering.

It sounds like a cuss word when used in this forum because we hold such people in low esteem.

[FORD]

So our resident kindergarten drop out is comparing the word "neocon" with the word "******"?

"neocon" is a word they came up with themselves. "Treasonous shitbag", which often accompanies the word "neocon" would be the insult part of it.

But then treason is a word that has a definition of it's own. One who is guilty of treason has betrayed his or her own country, as the treasonous shitbag neocons have done.

The word "******" has no such definition, as it is merely an offensive slang term meant to degrade someone of a particular skin pigmentation level (I don't use the term "race" as there is only ONE human race)

[DrMaddVibe]

But the "fine" Senator from W. Va. stated that there are white ******s too!

And he was in the Klan! I think he'd know for sure!

[DrMaddVibe]

Michelle Malkin (back to story)

March 7, 2001

Sen. Robert Byrd, ex-klansman

Ex-Klansman Robert Byrd, the senior senator from West Virginia, casually used the phrase "white ******" twice on national TV this weekend. Enraged civil rights groups organized a protest campaign against Sen. Byrd and demanded that he undergo sensitivity training ... not. The ex-Klansman, you see, is a Democrat. Democrats can join hate groups and utter the ugliest racial slurs and get away with it because they are Democrats. They belong to the party of racial tolerance and understanding. They're paragons of virtue, and the rest of us are bigoted rubes.

The ex-Klansman showed his true colors when asked by Fox News Sunday morning talk show host Tony Snow about the state of race relations in America. Sen. Byrd warned: "There are white ******s. I've seen a lot of white ******s in my time. I'm going to use that word. We just need to work together to make our country a better country, and I'd just as soon quit talking about it so much."

The ex-Klansman, famed for Beltway blowhardism, should have quit talking a lot sooner. Why any prominent politician in his right mind would publicly and deliberately use the poisonous epithet "******" -- which most daily newspapers refuse to spell out, no matter the context -- is beyond comprehension. It's an open question as to whether the rant-prone, 83-year-old Byrd is even in his right mind, but senility doesn't excuse bigotry.

The ex-Klansman's admirers praise his historical knowledge, mastery of procedural rules, and outspokenness. They refer to the Senate's senior Democrat as the "conscience of the Senate." They downplay his white-sheet-wearing days as a "brief mistake" -- as if joining the Klan were like knocking over a glass of water. Oopsy.

This ex-Klansman wasn't just a passive member of the nation's most notorious hate group. According to news accounts and biographical information, Sen. Byrd was a "Kleagle" -- an official recruiter who signed up members for $10 a head. He said he joined because it "offered excitement" and because the Klan was an "effective force" in "promoting traditional American values." Nothing like the thrill of gathering 'round a midnight bonfire, roasting s'mores, tying nooses, and promoting white supremacy with a bunch of your hooded friends.

The ex-Klansman allegedly ended his ties with the group in 1943. He may have stopped paying dues, but he continued to pay homage to the KKK. Republicans in West Virginia discovered a letter Sen. Byrd had written to the Imperial Wizard of the KKK three years after he says he abandoned the group. He wrote: "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia" and "in every state in the Union."

The ex-Klansman later filibustered the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act -- supported by a majority of those "mean-spirited" Republicans -- for more than 14 hours. He also opposed the nominations of the Supreme Court's two black justices, liberal Thurgood Marshall and conservative Clarence Thomas. In fact, the ex-Klansman had the gall to accuse Justice Thomas of "injecting racism" into the Senate hearings. Meanwhile, author Graham Smith recently discovered another letter Sen. Byrd wrote after he quit the KKK, this time attacking desegregation of the armed forces.

The ex-Klansman vowed never to fight "with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

If this ex-Klansman were a conservative Republican, he would never hear the end of his sordid past. "Ex-Klansman who opposed civil rights and black justices" would appear in every reference to Sen. Byrd. And even the "ex-" would be in doubt. Maxine Waters and Ralph Neas and Julianne Malveaux and Al Sharpton and all the other left-wing bloodhounds who sniff racism in every crevice of American life would be barking up a storm over Sen. Byrd's latest fulminations. Instead, the attack dogs are busy decrying latent racial bigotry where it doesn't exist, while the real thing roams wild and free in their own political backyard.

©2001 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

[FORD]

Nobody ever said Senator Byrd was perfect, but at least his dumbass statement didn't get anybody killed. Unlike Junior's

[bueno bob]

Well, the unfortunate downside to all this is that it's not going to get us any closer to getting rid of the Al-Queda (sp?) problem...in all reality, it's just more fuel to the fire for Bush and Blair to push their own agendas and dowse the public with more useless "We'll stand strong" rhetoric...I swear, that "We're not going to back down now!" drivel ought to be getting on ANYBODY'S nerves by now, regardless of what your political affiliation is.

What we need are RESULTS - not rhetoric, pointless occupations and useless saber-rattling.

Anybody else with me on that?

[DrMaddVibe]

Originally posted by FORD
Nobody ever said Senator Byrd was perfect, but at least his dumbass statement didn't get anybody killed. Unlike Junior's

just saying there's white ******s too!

Fact.

[academic punk]

Originally posted by bueno bob
Well, the unfortunate downside to all this is that it's not going to get us any closer to getting rid of the Al-Queda (sp?) problem...in all reality, it's just more fuel to the fire for Bush and Blair to push their own agendas and dowse the public with more useless "We'll stand strong" rhetoric...I swear, that "We're not going to back down now!" drivel ought to be getting on ANYBODY'S nerves by now, regardless of what your political affiliation is.

What we need are RESULTS - not rhetoric, pointless occupations and useless saber-rattling.

Anybody else with me on that?

No.

[FORD]

Originally posted by bueno bob
Well, the unfortunate downside to all this is that it's not going to get us any closer to getting rid of the Al-Queda (sp?) problem...in all reality, it's just more fuel to the fire for Bush and Blair to push their own agendas and dowse the public with more useless "We'll stand strong" rhetoric...I swear, that "We're not going to back down now!" drivel ought to be getting on ANYBODY'S nerves by now, regardless of what your political affiliation is.

What we need are RESULTS - not rhetoric, pointless occupations and useless saber-rattling.

Anybody else with me on that?

The only problem with that statement is how to get "results" from an "enemy" that can't even be defined.

[academic punk]

I personally enjoyed how all the news networks were reporting "TONY BLAIR CONDEMNS THE ATTACKS".

Like, really? He doesn't, like, you know, applaud them?

Now that we've gotten past the obvious, how about some info about the attacks? No? All right, then how about we go back to the missing girl in Aruba story? We all have a vested interest in finding out how that turns out.

[bueno bob]

Originally posted by FORD
The only problem with that statement is how to get "results" from an "enemy" that can't even be defined.

Well, for starters, I'd say eliminating the heads of the organization wouldn't be a bad start...maybe that's just me, though...

[bueno bob]

Originally posted by academic punk
No.

Yeah, it figures!

[bueno bob]

Maybe I'm just blowing hot air, honestly...I don't know...I'm just really pissed off about things in general, I think.

[thome]

If you bone heads really new what was going on insted of what you
read in your leftist fish raps you would kwow A Neo-Con is used to
and by to describe FORMER Dems who have switched party affiliation
to a repub .point of view on the wars in irak & afganistan it has nothing to do with existing Republicans.

CREDO:

Ignorant duffasses follow each other blindly DEM LIB SOCIALIST.