Not Another Rove Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LoungeMachine
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Jul 2004
    • 32576

    Not Another Rove Thread

    Source: Novak called Rove
    David Johnston, Richard W. Stevenson, New York Times

    Friday, July 15, 2005


    Washington -- Karl Rove, the White House senior adviser, spoke with the columnist Robert Novak as he was preparing an article in July 2003 that identified an undercover CIA officer, someone who has been officially briefed on the matter said Thursday.

    Rove has told investigators that he learned from the columnist the name of the CIA officer, who was referred to by her maiden name, Valerie Plame, and the circumstances in which her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, traveled to Africa to investigate possible uranium sales to Iraq, the source said.

    After hearing Novak's account, the source said, Rove told the columnist: "I heard that, too."

    The previously undisclosed telephone conversation, which took place on July 8, 2003, was initiated by Novak, the source said.

    Six days later, Novak's syndicated column reported that two senior administration officials had told him that Wilson's "wife had suggested sending him" to Africa. That column was the first instance in which Valerie Wilson was publicly identified as a CIA operative. The column provoked angry demands for an investigation into who disclosed her name to Novak.

    The Justice Department appointed Patrick Fitzgerald, a top federal prosecutor in Chicago, to lead the inquiry. Rove said in an interview last year that he did not know the CIA officer's name and did not leak it.

    The person who provided the information about Rove's conversation with Novak declined to be identified, citing requests by Fitzgerald that no one discuss the case. The person discussed the matter in the belief that Rove was truthful in saying he did not disclose Valerie Wilson's identity.

    On Oct. 1, 2003, Novak wrote another column in which he described calling two officials. The first source, who is unknown, was described by Novak as "no partisan gunslinger" who provided the outlines of the story. The second, confirming source, Novak wrote, responded, "Oh, you know about it."

    That second source was Rove, the person briefed on the matter said, although Rove's account to investigators about what he told Novak was slightly different. Rove recalled telling Novak: "I heard that, too."

    Asked by investigators how he knew enough to leave Novak with the impression that his information was accurate, Rove said he heard portions of the story from other journalists, but had not heard Wilson's name.

    Robert Luskin, Rove's lawyer, said Thursday, "Any pertinent information has been provided to the prosecutor." Luskin has previously said that prosecutors have advised Rove that he is not a target in the case, which means he is not likely to be charged with a crime.

    Novak declined to discuss the matter Thursday.

    The conversation between Novak and Rove seemed almost certain to intensify the question about whether one of President Bush's closest political advisers played a role in what appeared to be an effort to undermine Joseph Wilson's credibility after he challenged the veracity of a key point in Bush's 2003 State of the Union speech, alleging that Saddam Hussein had sought nuclear fuel in Africa.

    The conversation with Novak took place three days before Rove spoke with Matthew Cooper, a Time magazine reporter, whose e-mail message about their conversation reignited the issue. In the message, whose contents were reported by Newsweek this week, Cooper told his editors that Rove had talked about Valerie Wilson, although not by name.

    As the political debate about Rove grows more heated, Fitzgerald is in what he has said are the final stages of his investigation into whether anyone at the White House violated a criminal statute that, under certain circumstances, makes it a crime for a government official to disclose the names of covert operatives like Wilson.

    The law requires that the official knowingly identify an officer serving in a covert position. The person who has been briefed on the matter said Rove knew neither Wilson's name nor that she was a covert officer. White House officials may argue that Rove's conversation with Novak did not amount to leaking the name of the agent. But to Bush's critics -- including the Democrats who have called for Rove's resignation -- that is splitting hairs, and Rove in effect confirmed her identity, even if he did not name her.
    Originally posted by Kristy
    Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
    Originally posted by cadaverdog
    I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?
  • Nickdfresh
    SUPER MODERATOR

    • Oct 2004
    • 49563

    #2
    Currnet speculation is that ROVE could get sent up for perjury.

    Comment

    • LoungeMachine
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Jul 2004
      • 32576

      #3
      A
      The Real Problems with Plamegate


      by James M. MacDougall

      There has been much speculation in recent days about the involvement of Karl Rove and others in the disclosure of the identity of a covert CIA operative. The chatter back and forth from opposing political perspectives raises some very debatable points as well as a lot of useless noise. Unfortunately most of this obscures the real issue at the heart of the matter, the national security of the United States and the safety of the American public.

      Whether or not the legal definition of section 421, title 50, of the United States Code [i] covers Mr. Rove's actions will be debated in the months or years to come. However, this discussion obscures the debate we should be having in this country, how have these actions undermined our national security and our ability to protect our citizens. Where covert cover is never perfect, having it spread all over the front page surely cannot help our cause.

      Whether these actions are legally treasonous or not is a question for the U.S. judiciary system. The fact that these actions severely damage our ability to protect the citizens of this nation is the central fact, and one that deserves every American's immediate attention.

      Let's take a look at the legacy handed down by the actions of Mr. Rove and others in this administration.

      1) Disclosure of the identity of a covert agent of the CIA.

      Whatever the background of this act is, it is irrelevant to the central fact that these actions brought about the public knowledge that Valerie Plame [or Mrs. Wilson if you like] was an undercover operations officer for the CIA, more specifically a NOC, that's a non-official cover officer. In layman's terms that means she agreed to operate overseas without the security of a diplomatic passport.[ii] This meant if she was caught she could be executed. It also made her association with the CIA much harder to figure out.

      This "outing" started a chain reaction that thundered through the community of foreign intelligence agencies and actors, which severely compromised the agency's ability to protect this nation. Within hours of this information becoming public, agencies and actors around the world would reconstruct her movements and history, thus endangering other agency secrets. This coupled with the disclosure of Mohammad Naeem Noor Khan[iii], an al-Qaeda informant that Pakistani intelligence was using to provide information on his contacts in the organization, provide a disturbing habit of "outing" persons for suspect reasons.

      Because of this trend foreign agents are less likely to cooperate with U.S. agencies for fear of being exposed for little reason. The fact that this action possibly destroyed years of CIA operations in the field of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, especially into the hands of rogue states and non-state actors,[iv] should in itself be enough to condemn these actions, but unfortunately the damage did not stop there.

      2) This leak caused the exposure of a CIA front company.

      In a subsequent interview on CNN, journalist Robert Novak also exposed an agency operational company, Brewster-Jennings & Associates, in an effort to paint Plame as a partisan.[v] This expanded the damage exponentially. Now, not only could external actors connect any doings of Mrs. Wilson to the CIA, they could also connect Brewster-Jennings & Associates and anyone who had connections to them, as possible agency assets.

      The extent of this damage may never be publicly known as it usurps some of the most sensitive areas of the agency's investigations in the illegal transfer of WDM technology and information. It has been said that Brewster-Jennings & Associates was not much of a cover, but then it was not supposed to be. It was just a holding company for overseas officers while they were in the United States.

      Vince Cannistraro, the CIA's former counterterrorism chief, said that when operating undercover outside the United States, Plame would have had a real job with a more legitimate company. The Boston company "is not an indicator of what she did overseas,"[vi]. There is a reason that sources and methods are protected so vigorously by our security services, once exposed those sources and methods are no longer of much use. The association of Valerie Plame and Brewster-Jennings & Associates with the CIA makes the connection of dots between these and other valuable agency assets that much easier and laid bare both sources and methods.

      3) These actions severely damaged this country's ability to stop a WMD terrorist attack in this country.

      It takes years to set up covert avenues of information into such sensitive areas. The work of thousands goes into the establishment of intelligence covers and the gradual infiltration of agencies associated with the proliferation of WMD secrets and abilities into the hands of those that would do this nation and the world harm. A portion of this work was swept away in days by the information provided by Mr. Rove and others in this administration for what as best could be summarized as a minor political objective, at worst, just retribution and intimidation of those who dared speak in opposition to the administration's ambitions.

      In these days of national threat, I find these actions even more inexcusable. Porter Goss stated in his speech on Global Intelligence Challenges before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in February of 2005 that "It may be only a matter of time before al-Qa'ida or another group attempts to use chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons (CBRN)."[vii]

      Seeing as this is such a high priority issue in the national defense circles, it begs the question why any information that could be damaging to this effort was made public at all.

      The realizations that it is "only a matter of time" before groups use WMD on this nation or our allies, spotlights even more the dastardly nature of the actions of participants in this administration. The fact that any information that would hinder the deterrence of these groups from obtaining the material and knowledge needed to complete their goal of a WMD attack in this country would be released, for any reason whatsoever, seems completely outrageous and indefensible. The fact that it happened and Karl Rove is involved is irrefutable; all that remains to be determined is the motive and who are the other participants.

      A priority of this administration is the global war on terror[viii]; this should include the defense of this nation from attack, especially from WMD. That being said, how can we trust an administration that would defend personnel and actions that have undermined that very function? Whether this action was perpetrated through spite or stupidity, how can we leave those that made theses decisions in charge of our national security? This is only one more incident to highlight in the litany of irresponsible actions of this administration. It would seem that none in Washington have any idea whatsoever on how to win this war we find ourselves in.

      This leaves the only question to be asked, "Are we to wait for the smoking gun of their incompetence to be a mushroom cloud over a U.S. city, or are we going to protect our nation from those who abdicate their responsibility to do so?"

      * * *

      Notes:

      [i] US Code: Title 50, Subchapter iv—protection of certain national security information http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h..._15_20_IV.html

      [ii] The Big Lie About Valerie Plame, Larry Johnson, Jul 13, 2005 http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/13/04720/9340

      [iii] Captured Qaeda Figure Led Way To Information Behind Warning, NY Times, August 2, 2004,

      [iv] Ambassador Joseph Wilson IV, a Buzzflash interview, April 30, 2004


      [v] Leak of Agent's Name Causes Exposure of CIA Front Firm, Washington Post, October 4, 2003 http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...&notFound=true

      [vi] Apparent CIA front didn't offer much cover, Boston Globe, October 10, 2003


      [vii] Testimony of Director of Central Intelligence, Porter J. Goss, Before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 16 February 2005 (as prepared for delivery) http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affair..._02162005.html

      [viii] "First and foremost, the Global War on Terror will remain a priority of the administration." Quote from Secretary of State Colin Powell briefing reporters November 8, 2004 en route to Mexico City, Mexico, to attend the 21st meeting of the U.S.-Mexico Binational Commission


      James M. MacDougall
      Originally posted by Kristy
      Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
      Originally posted by cadaverdog
      I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

      Comment

      • LoungeMachine
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Jul 2004
        • 32576

        #4
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Currnet speculation is that ROVE could get sent up for perjury.
        Good.

        Novak and He can be Cellmates.

        From what I understand, KKKarl would like to be the "bottom bunkmate"


        NOVAK SHOULD HANG


        Originally posted by Kristy
        Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
        Originally posted by cadaverdog
        I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

        Comment

        • DrMaddVibe
          ROTH ARMY ELITE
          • Jan 2004
          • 6686

          #5
          Keep dreaming!

          No foul, no crime...moveon.org fuckos!
          http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x...auders1zl5.gif
          http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c4...willywonka.gif

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49563

            #6
            Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
            Keep dreaming!

            No foul, no crime...moveon.org fuckos!
            No crime fucko? Uh...well, this is why BUSH's presidency is in the shitter. It means nothing when he has fawning enablers.

            This from a guy that though an intern administered blowjob was the most evil thing on the planet.

            Comment

            • DrMaddVibe
              ROTH ARMY ELITE
              • Jan 2004
              • 6686

              #7
              Go make up some more shit idiot!
              http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x...auders1zl5.gif
              http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c4...willywonka.gif

              Comment

              • Nickdfresh
                SUPER MODERATOR

                • Oct 2004
                • 49563

                #8
                Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
                Go make up some more shit idiot!
                Go bury your head in your local GOP party chairman's ass tool.

                Comment

                • LoungeMachine
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 32576

                  #9
                  Originally posted by DrMaddVibe

                  No foul, no crime...moveon.org fuckos!
                  You're such a fucking idiot.

                  Seriously.

                  Brain dead moron
                  Originally posted by Kristy
                  Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                  Originally posted by cadaverdog
                  I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                  Comment

                  • BigBadBrian
                    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 10625

                    #10
                    Who are they going to try to pin a crime on next?
                    “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush

                    Comment

                    • Nickdfresh
                      SUPER MODERATOR

                      • Oct 2004
                      • 49563

                      #11
                      Originally posted by BigBadBrian
                      Who are they going to try to pin a crime on next?
                      Just have an intern blow him for impeachment proceedings.

                      Comment

                      • LoungeMachine
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Jul 2004
                        • 32576

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BigBadBrian
                        Who are they going to try to pin a crime on next?
                        You
                        Originally posted by Kristy
                        Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                        Originally posted by cadaverdog
                        I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                        Comment

                        • thome
                          ROTH ARMY ELITE
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 6678

                          #13
                          All Bush has to do is declare Marshal Law towards the end of his
                          Presidency( Due to a well staged terr attack).Like the bombing
                          in london you all think he designed and he will have a third term. you cant unseat
                          a presiding Pres while Marshall Law activated.

                          spooky huh.

                          Comment

                          • LoungeMachine
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 32576

                            #14
                            Originally posted by BigBadBrian
                            Who are they going to try to pin a crime on next?
                            Which "they" ??

                            The CIA, which approached the Justice Dept. about filing a criminal complaint in the matter of the OUTING a cover CIA operative?

                            Or John Ashcroft, who had to recuse himself because he knew too much?

                            Or special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald?

                            Or the Grand Jury, which Novak told it was ROVE, who fingered Plame [pun intended] ?

                            Or ROVE, who told the Grand Jury NOVAK fingered Plame [ pun disgusting] ?

                            Or The Chimp, who said the leaker would be "dealt with" ?


                            Just which "they" are you speaking of, B ???

                            Originally posted by Kristy
                            Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                            Originally posted by cadaverdog
                            I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                            Comment

                            • Warham
                              DIAMOND STATUS
                              • Mar 2004
                              • 14589

                              #15
                              It's not that Clinton got a blowjob. It's the fact that he committed perjury, and lied through his fucking teeth until he couldn't hide it anymore.

                              You guys want to send Rove up the river for perjury and throw away the keys. Why wasn't Clinton sent up the river for the same thing?? One answer...he's a Democrat and a hero to most of you liberals here!

                              Comment

                              Working...