Damm.. Rollingstone really hates bush

[Sarge]

http://rollingstone.com/politics/

[Sarge]

Censure Bush

It's time to reprimand him for betraying our trust

[steve]

Controversy Stirs Questions of Reports Unread, Statements Contradicted

By Dana Milbank and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, July 27, 2003; Page A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...anguage=printer

Absolutely - censure him.

Read the above article. it's old, but I think it's pretty sickening.
To send young men to War based upon intelligence info, then to have the audacity to claim to have "not finished reading the report" that was ON THE OVAL OFFICE DESK noting objections to that intelligence info...

This type of reponce is just unconscionable.

[ELVIS]

Those articles are all fabricated bullshit...

Unfortunately.. alot of people form their decisions based on unreliable sources like this...

[DLR'sCock]

Originally posted by Sarge
Censure Bush

It's time to reprimand him for betraying our trust

Hell yeah...

[steve]

Originally posted by ELVIS
Those articles are all fabricated bullshit...

Unfortunately.. alot of people form their decisions based on unreliable sources like this...

If you don't believe me or the "biased" Washington Post - search through the archives of ANY major news outlet. They were words from press conferences and DIRECT QUOTES from Rice. They even reported those quotes on FOX News for christsakes - if you so choose to search through their archives.

Also..."alot" is two words.

OK, that last one was, just me bein' a smartass - but nonetheless, check out any source for yourself.

[Flash Bastard]

Rolling Stone has about as much journalistic credibility as Melodicrock.com.

Don't fall for that bullshit, Sarge.

[Flash Bastard]

Originally posted by steve
If you don't believe me or the "biased" Washington Post - search through the archives of ANY major news outlet. They were words from press conferences and DIRECT QUOTES from Rice. They even reported those quotes on FOX News for christsakes - if you so choose to search through their archives.

I just searched all major news outlets and no deal.

Give me some links. VALID ones.

[steve]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A51224-2003Jul26?language=printer

“…In the White House briefing room on July 18, a senior administration official, speaking to reporters on the condition of anonymity, said Rice did not read October's National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, the definitive prewar assessment of Iraq's weapons programs by U.S. intelligence agencies. "We have experts who work for the national security adviser who would know this information," the official said when asked if Rice had read the NIE. Referring to an annex raising doubts about Iraq's nuclear program, the official said Bush and Rice "did not read footnotes in a 90-page document. . . . The national security adviser has people that do that." The annex was boxed and in regular type.

Four days later, Rice's deputy, Stephen J. Hadley, said in a second White House briefing that he did not mention doubts raised by the CIA about an African uranium claim Bush planned to make in an October speech (the accusation, cut from that speech, reemerged in Bush's State of the Union address). Hadley said he did not mention the objections to Rice because "there was no need." Hadley said he does not recall ever discussing the matter with Rice, suggesting she was not aware that the sentence had been removed.

Hadley said he could not recall discussing the CIA's concerns about the uranium claim, which was based largely on British intelligence. He said a second memo from the CIA protesting the claim was sent to Rice, but "I can't tell you she read it. I can't tell you she received it." Rice herself used the allegation in a January op-ed article….”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/nationalsecurity/documents/nie_iraq_wmd.pdf

[steve]

Go to Yahoo search and paste in these words:

"did not read footnotes in a 90-page document"


You will find hundreds of articles on what happened.

[John Ashcroft]

Get ready for another 4 years fellas. This bullshit is turning swing voters away.

Do you guys really think Kerry is going to turn out the vote? I mean, a good segment of Union labor (which is notoriously a Democrat stronghold) consists of Vietnam Vets. I don't believe they'll be coming in droves to put "Hanoi John" in the Whitehouse.

[FORD]

Originally posted by ELVIS
Those articles are all fabricated bullshit...

So was Junior's "evidence" on Iraq.

[John Ashcroft]

You mean "Clinton's evidence on Iraq"? They're one in the same.

[steve]

Don't worry J.A. Clinton will be Secretary of State in 7 months.

[Cathedral]

I'm voting for myself and friing everyone in Washington if you'll give me your support.

We need change in this country but we need a restorative change that neither party is talking about.

I keep hearing, and i quote, "I want to steer this Country in a new direction"

Pardon me, but we first need to stay a course before we implement change such as this.

Step One: Tell Big Business to take their wallets and go away, it's the tax paying hard working American that makes this country great, not the few who are unable to relate to the populations majority.