Who gave this speech???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Ashcroft
    Veteran
    • Jan 2004
    • 2127

    Who gave this speech???

    In recent months I have spoken many times about how difficult and dangerous a period it is through which we now move. I would like to take this opportunity to say a word about the American spirit in this time of trial.

    In the most critical periods of our nation's history, there have always been those fringes of our society who have sought to escape their own responsibility by finding a simple solution, an appealing slogan, or a convenient scapegoat.

    Financial crises could be explained by the presence of too many immigrants or too few greenbacks.

    War could be attributed to munitions makers or international bankers.

    Peace conferences failed because we were duped by the British or tricked by the French or deceived by the Russians.

    It was not the presence of Soviet troops in Eastern Europe that drove it to communism, it was the sell-out at Yalta. It was not a civil war that removed China from the free world, it was treason in high places. At times these fanatics have achieved a temporary success among those who lack the will or the vision to face unpleasant tasks or unsolved problems.

    But in time the basic good sense and stability of the great American consensus has always prevailed.

    Now we are face to face once again with a period of heightened peril. The risks are great, the burdens heavy, the problems incapable of swift or lasting solution. And under the strains and frustrations imposed by constant tension and harassment, the discordant voices of extremism are heard once again in the land. Men who are unwilling to face up to the danger from without are convinced that the real danger comes from within. They look suspiciously at their neighbors and their leaders. They call for a 'man on horseback' because they do not trust the people. They find treason in our finest churches, in our highest court, and even in the treatment of our water. They equate the Democratic Party with the welfare state, the welfare state with socialism, and socialism with communism. They object quite rightly to politics' intruding on the military -- but they are anxious for the military to engage in politics.

    But you and I and most Americans take a different view of our peril. We know that it comes from without, not within. It must be met by quiet preparedness, not provocative speeches.

    And the steps taken this year to bolster our defenses -- to increase our missile forces, to put more planes on alert, to provide more airlift and sealift and ready divisions -- to make more certain than ever before that this nation has all the power it will need to deter any attack of any kind -- those steps constitute the most effective answer that can be made to those who would sow the seeds of doubt and hate.

    So let us not heed these counsels of fear and suspicion. Let us concentrate more on keeping enemy bombers and missiles away from our shores, and concentrate less on keeping neighbors away from our shelters. Let us devote more energy to organize the free and friendly nations of the world, with common trade and strategic goals, and devote less energy to organizing armed bands of civilian guerrillas that are more likely to supply local vigilantes than national vigilance.

    Let our patriotism be reflected in the creation of confidence rather than crusades of suspicion. Let us prove we think our country great by striving to make it greater. And, above all, let us remember that, however serious the outlook, the one great irreversible trend in world history is on the side of liberty -- and so, for all time to come, are we.

    Link: here if you want to cheat
  • lucky wilbury

    #2
    does the person who said it have a drinking problem or a fidelity problem?

    Comment

    • Lincoln
      Groupie
      • Jan 2004
      • 80

      #3
      Originally posted by lucky wilbury
      does the person who said it have a drinking problem or a fidelity problem?
      Not sure about the drinking part but had a fidelity problem would be on track.
      http://debatepolicy.com

      Comment

      • Satan
        ROTH ARMY ELITE
        • Jan 2004
        • 6664

        #4
        I don't even have to look at the link. I recognize the speech itself and the style of the writing .

        It's a great President who was murdered because he threatened the very agenda of those who his predecessor warned us all about.

        The man who Judas IsKerryot will never be, despite the wrong minded worship of his supporters who think coincidental initials make him in any way comparable

        Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

        Originally posted by Sockfucker
        I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

        Comment

        • Ralph_Nader_2K4
          Full On Cocktard
          • Apr 2004
          • 27

          #5
          A speech from John Ashcroft... well, well, well... I suppose you don't remember me, do you John? It's been a few years but I've challenged you on one thing or another. Not like I have challenged your boss (Bush) though. He is a real pickle.

          -Ralph
          www.votenader.org

          A VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS IS A VOTE FOR DUOPOLY-BASED CORRUPTION!

          VOTE NADER INSTEAD!!!

          Comment

          • Ralph_Nader_2K4
            Full On Cocktard
            • Apr 2004
            • 27

            #6
            That was a joke by the way. Ha ha. Sorry, my political tongue gets in the way sometimes. Still no difference between Reps and Dems.

            -Ralph
            www.votenader.org

            A VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS IS A VOTE FOR DUOPOLY-BASED CORRUPTION!

            VOTE NADER INSTEAD!!!

            Comment

            • Lincoln
              Groupie
              • Jan 2004
              • 80

              #7
              Originally posted by Ralph_Nader_2K4

              A speech from John Ashcroft... well, well, well...
              Uh, the speech was from John Kennedy, not Ashcroft.
              http://debatepolicy.com

              Comment

              • John Ashcroft
                Veteran
                • Jan 2004
                • 2127

                #8
                Yepper.

                Remarkable contrast to the modern-day Democrat party line (and uncle Ted's ramblings), isn't it? Could've been Dubya giving this speech in a modern context.

                So, what happened to the Democratic party? How did they get here from there???

                I can say with confidence that had I been alive at the time I'd be a Democrat (with a leader like JFK at the helm). Although I don't believe I'd go on to oppose the Civil Rights Act like most of the Dems did in '64...

                Oh, and Ralphie, good luck pal! Keep on running, you can do it!

                Comment

                • Lincoln
                  Groupie
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 80

                  #9
                  Originally posted by John Ashcroft
                  Oh, and Ralphie, good luck pal! Keep on running, you can do it!
                  That's right JA :D.
                  http://debatepolicy.com

                  Comment

                  • Ralph_Nader_2K4
                    Full On Cocktard
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 27

                    #10
                    Thanks for the support guys. Wow. It really means a lot.

                    -Ralph
                    www.votenader.org

                    A VOTE FOR THE REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS IS A VOTE FOR DUOPOLY-BASED CORRUPTION!

                    VOTE NADER INSTEAD!!!

                    Comment

                    • Viking
                      Veteran
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 1774

                      #11
                      I don't agree with Kennedy's positions on some things, but the sad part is, JFK was a Reagan Republican when it came to our sovereignty and national defense. The poor bastard is probably flipping in his pine box over how his party - and his fat, cowardly, pompous brother - is invoking his name for political gain. Talk about pissing on your grave.

                      Comment

                      • John Ashcroft
                        Veteran
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 2127

                        #12
                        Yep, Reagan was a Kennedy democrat, and turned Republican when the party embraced socialism (and started actively undermining American national security).

                        Comment

                        Working...