Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers

[Rikk]

LMFAO...I hear all the theories.

If anyone cares, I still think it was two planes loaded with fuel and the metal foundations melted to shit...something like that.

Hey, I love conspiracies. I consider myself pretty liberal...whatever the fuck that means in this day and age. But I've never bought the conspiracy theories concerning the actual cause of the collapse. Funny enough, I had a car conversation with a few people about this on Thursday night...and I was the only one in the car that bought the jet full of fuel and super-hot fire theory...

[diamondD]

Where's the TFBE crowd?

[Hardrock69]

Funny how the structural engineer conveniently does not take into account the numerous explosions resembling demolition charges witnessed many floors below the floor in question long after the planes struck the towers.

[thome]

Here's my theory who gives a FUK.some people sit in their cars and die
by the thousands. Nobody cares. Fuk the theories, their still dead and the buildings smashed their skulls to oatmeal.

Stop looking for bizzare causes.or don't, your time is well spent .

Did you hear Van Halen Has Sammy Hagar as a Singer??

WHAT!!!

NO, THAT'S INSANE.This is more important than the life & death soap opera we call Life.

[knuckleboner]

Originally posted by Rikk
LMFAO...I hear all the theories.

If anyone cares, I still think it was two planes loaded with fuel and the metal foundations melted to shit...something like that.

actually, they didn't melt, which is why a lot of the conspiracy theory crowd initially latched onto the...alternative...causes for collapse.

"but the fires weren't hot enough to melt the steel!" they'd say. and they were right.

but the fires were hot enough to weaken the steel. (technically, any heat weakens steel to some degree. the higher the temperature, the weaker the steel gets until it eventually melts.)

clearly, melted steel would not have been able to hold those buildings up. at the same time, there is some level of weakened steel, that, while still intact would also not be strong enough to hold up the mass of the floors above it.


well, that, or a bunch of cherry bombs in the toilets...

[ELVIS]

Originally posted by Hardrock69
Funny how the structural engineer conveniently does not take into account the numerous explosions resembling demolition charges witnessed many floors below the floor in question long after the planes struck the towers.

Do you even hear yourself ??

[Hardrock69]

Yes.

[diamondD]

Those "explosions" were the sound of the support snapping. The sounds were the building coming down upon itself.

Do you think it would just come down quietly after reaching the breaking point?

[ELVIS]

Dude, you can't explain anything to these idiots...

They want so bad for the government to have taken the WTC down...

Keep these ideas in mind for the next conspiracy...

[Rikk]

I hate Bush. I hate the entire administration. I think they're criminals.

But I 100% believe that the steel was weakened to a certain point until it just gave out (thus, the breaking sounds...or "explosions") and the building(s) collapsed.

[Hardrock69]

Originally posted by knuckleboner
actually, they didn't melt, which is why a lot of the conspiracy theory crowd initially latched onto the...alternative...causes for collapse.

"but the fires weren't hot enough to melt the steel!" they'd say. and they were right.

but the fires were hot enough to weaken the steel. (technically, any heat weakens steel to some degree. the higher the temperature, the weaker the steel gets until it eventually melts.)

clearly, melted steel would not have been able to hold those buildings up. at the same time, there is some level of weakened steel, that, while still intact would also not be strong enough to hold up the mass of the floors above it.


well, that, or a bunch of cherry bombs in the toilets...

No they were not melted. Some of them were partially VAPORIZED.

Something that mere "fire" cannot achieve.

[ELVIS]

Keep on dreaming up "facts"...

[Warham]

Originally posted by Hardrock69
No they were not melted. Some of them were partially VAPORIZED.

Something that mere "fire" cannot achieve.

You were in the Towers just before they collapsed???

Please, tell us your amazing story!

[Hardrock69]

Originally posted by Rikk
I hate Bush. I hate the entire administration. I think they're criminals.

But I 100% believe that the steel was weakened to a certain point until it just gave out (thus, the breaking sounds...or "explosions") and the building(s) collapsed.

You can "believe" what you want.

I only believe factual evidence.

"Just the facts, man".

[Rikk]

Can we at least all agree that vagina tastes best after a shower?