Aljazeera should have been bombed a long time ago. All their anti-american bullshit has been tolerated long enough. Also, piss on France & Germany. These are a bunch of ungrateful COWARDS.
Bush's Mad Plans To Bomb Aljazeera TV In Qatar
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by larbo
Aljazeera should have been bombed a long time ago. All their anti-american bullshit has been tolerated long enough. Also, piss on France & Germany. These are a bunch of ungrateful COWARDS.Comment
-
Originally posted by larbo
Take your OWN advice, Fartsters. & quit stalking me everytime I post. I already told you I'm not gay so fuck off! Ford & Nickpdiddyfresh might be Interested though..........Comment
-
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Well, why don't you put in your false teeth and go down to the recruiters tough guy? They'll take anybody these days, even half-wit internet trolls that expose themselves in public to relatives and farm animals...
Most people on the frontline are from W.Va. dipshit! Why? 'Cause they want the fucking job to get done. Ask Sarge. I have all of my teeth as do most people here, unlike little crack-head city wiggers! Also, fag, there IS more cousin lovin' going on in New York than there will ever be in W.VA.. Furthermore, Not that it's any of your fucking buisiness, I already pulled my tour the first war, little boy.Last edited by larbo; 11-30-2005, 12:29 AM.WIGGER STOMPER
Comment
-
Originally posted by larbo
Most people on the frontline are from W.Va. dipshit! Why? 'Cause they want the fucking job to get done.
Or they're expendable toothless cannon fodder...
Ask Sarge.
I have all of my teeth as do most people here, unlike little crack-head city wiggers! Also, fag, there IS more cousin lovin' going on in New York than there will ever be in W.VA>
Are you conducting the cousin-humper survey or something?Comment
-
I don't see the point in bombing Al-Jazeera. if you wage war on a media source that would have some terrible consequences as that news reverbarates around the world.
Then you'll have 10 Al-Jazeera's popping up in its place making the situation much much worse.
It's not smart or necessary at all.Comment
-
Hey Burbank Bitchboy...
Shut your cocksucker and keep your sheet wearing ass out of this forum, you little racist bitch.Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992Comment
-
Eat Us And Smile
Cenk For America 2024!!
Justice Democrats
"If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992Comment
-
Originally posted by larbo
Take your OWN advice, Fartsters. & quit stalking me everytime I post. I already told you I'm not gay so fuck off! Ford & Nickpdiddyfresh might be Interested though..........
I feel sorry for your mom.Comment
-
November 30, 2005
2 Britons Accused in Leak of Bush-Al Jazeera Memo
The document said the president had proposed to Blair in 2004 that the Arab TV channel be bombed, a newspaper reported this month.
By John Daniszewski, Times Staff Writer
LONDON — Two men appeared in court Tuesday accused of mishandling official secrets in connection with a memo that, according to a newspaper account, showed President Bush had proposed bombing the Arab news channel Al Jazeera and was talked out of it by British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
When the Daily Mirror published its account Nov. 22, the White House dismissed it as ludicrous. "We are not going to dignify something so outlandish with a response," a White House official said at the time.
But officials of Qatar-based Al Jazeera, the Arab world's most influential satellite news channel, regard the denial as evasive. The station's general director has been in London this week seeking a clarification from Blair and asking that the memo be made public.
At the same time, prosecutors have said that if the Mirror and other newspapers publish the contents of the memo, they too could be liable under Britain's Official Secrets Act, which forbids publication of confidential government information. Newspapers have accused the government of trying to gag them to save the U.S. president from embarrassment.
According to published descriptions, the secret five-page memo is a detailed account of conversations between Bush and Blair in April 2004, when the war in Iraq had entered a particularly heated phase. It allegedly was passed in May or June 2004 from a Cabinet employee, David Keogh, to a staff member of a Parliament member.
The Parliament member, Anthony Clarke, found the memo in his office and returned it to the government, but not, apparently, before some people outside the government became familiar with its contents. Clarke, a member of Blair's Labor Party, has since left Parliament.
Keogh, a former communications officer, and Leo O'Connor, a researcher for Clarke, appeared in court Tuesday.
The charge against Keogh was a "damaging disclosure of a document" relating to international relations, while O'Connor was accused of receiving a document from a civil servant.
O'Connor pleaded not guilty; Keogh did not enter a plea. A lawyer for O'Connor told reporters that his client was surprised and "very disappointed" to have been charged. The case was adjourned until Jan. 10.
Al Jazeera General Director Waddah Khanfar said White House and Downing Street statements about the memo so far "do not satisfy anyone, especially Al Jazeera … and journalists all over the world…. They are going to increase the doubts and the speculations."
Khanfar said he was not assuming that the Mirror's original report was true, but said that it deserved to be cleared up.
"I actually suspend any judgment until we know exactly the truth behind it," he said. "We have not received any official denial, neither an official confirmation. This is why we are here, in order to find out the whole truth about this document."
Since the Mirror article appeared, there have been suggestions that even if Bush and Blair had discussed military action against Al Jazeera, Bush must not have been serious.
Kevin Maguire, who co-wrote the Mirror article, said that his source, who was familiar with the document, had no doubt that Bush was serious. Maguire said he himself had not seen the document and therefore was keeping an open mind.
"I … could be convinced in future that perhaps Bush just said something in a fury and never intended it that way, although the prime minister didn't interpret it that way," Maguire said.
Even though Al Jazeera is hugely popular in the Arab world and is situated in the capital of a country friendly to the United States, it frequently has been accused of having an anti-Western agenda, and of allowing itself to be used by Al Qaeda to spread the terrorist network's views.
Founded in 1996 and largely funded by the emir of Qatar, the news channel denies that it is for or against any government. Its reports and discussion shows have raised hackles in many Arab countries as well as the United States, its advocates point out.
In 2001, its office in Kabul, Afghanistan, was struck by a U.S. bomb, and in 2003, one of its correspondents in Baghdad was killed in a bombing. In both cases, U.S. officials denied that the channel had been targeted.
Link
Janet Stobart of The Times' London Bureau contributed to this report.Comment
Comment