MORE Experts Say Chimpy And Co. Need TO Come Clean About 9/11

[DR CHIP]

I agree that Kennedy and 9/11 have several things to be desired when it comes to the facts getting out....

BUT

In my humble opinion, it takes more to believe in a gov't cover up than it does to believe that Oswald shot Kennedy and 9/11 was what it was.....

By the way there is a great program on the Kennedy Assasination played on the history channel. Some dudes from Aust. re-do the shot exactly as it was through two bodies from the same distance etc....believe it or not the bullet basically does what the magic bullet theory says happened....

[bobgnote]

Originally posted by knuckleboner
ummm...i'm confused...so let me get this straight:

these guys think that:
1) the U.S. government was somehow involved in setting up 9/11
2) that flight 93 did not crash, but was presumably shot down by the U.S. government
3) the same U.S. government, who started 9/11, shot down one of it's own components, but is now covering up that it shot down what it started.

man, my head is hurting...

---------------------

ONE:
The US deregulated its power oligopoly at fraud to keep hemp and genetic engineered crops OUT with all biodiesel, in the mid-90s. California went deregulated in 1996, RIGHT AFTER the US practically TOLD the Israeli right it could hit Yitzhak Rabin and bust the Oslo Accords, when Israel should have been glad to survive, where it does not belong in any role of authority.

TWO:
You do NOT get to keep EITHER your inflationary, post-deregulation power deals, OR the Israeli power play, to end Oslo, without 9/11/01.

THREE:
You do NOT get to fund Iraq and Afghan Wars, with the illegal deals in, which undermine ALL US FUNDING, in terrible detail, and assert Israel, which was formerly Israel or Judea in the are of the West Bank. Look at modern, Orthodox religious state ISRAEL. It is NOT neatly in the area of the West Bank, and it belongs nowhere in Palestine. Yet first the British with the League of Nations then the US with the UN has over-asserted ISRAEL, spawned by corrupt British military industry and its awful Victorian anti-diplomacy to the Mid-East.

FOUR:
The recent Dr. al-Zawahiri tape acknowledges that the GW regime does NOT intend to get along with Al Queda, Islam, or anybody not chatteled actually or virtually to the US. We may get hit with a barrage.

FIVE:
You should have seen that the burning Towers were like our current situation, where Israel is like the North Tower, we in the US are like the South Tower, hit second but going down, FIRST. WE DO NOT GET TO HAVE OUR ILLEGAL, INFLATIONARY POWER DEALS, before they drag us down to hell of murders and acquisitions, AND ISRAEL FOLLOWS, soon enough.

SIX:
Add 9/11/2001 and then 5/8/2008 linearly, to 23, Mike Jordan's #. The progression is from
11/3/95, the Rabin hit
9/11/2001
7/7/2005, London
5/8/2008, Yom HaAzmaut, Israel's 60th

Of course, the Cinco de Maio right before is the 126th day of the 126th year, since the Euro-Zionists went into Palestine, in 1882.

Any idiot who thinks the US was NOT trying to INCITE the 9/11/2001 WTC attacks is a real IDIOT, an American Super******.

Any idiot who thinks he does not need to count to 7 real slow is a dumbshit in traffic, looking to get hit at the ballgame, May 2008, having helped all the other idiots, and there's LOADS, to hide TRUTH.

TRUTH is GW made it all go down from Clinton's handoff, and you assholes who hide the progression WHILE you hide the illegal power deals and their inflation probably have not figured out you can DIE for your stealing, and take everybody else with you, by angering Al Queda!

So HERE IT IS: You idiots with the wheel better pull over and show I.D.

[Warham]

I got a good article to read for those of you who believe in these kinds of scenarios.

[knuckleboner]

Originally posted by diamondD



I believe Flight 93 was shot down as well. Since they were going to die anyway, I don't think it was unreasonable. I'd rather it be official and not kept a secret tho.

i don't really see the benefit to a coverup.

i would think there's better PR for the government if they could say they were able to respond to 1 of 4 planes, rather than 0 for 4.

the downside would be if they actually shot down a non-hijacked plane. or one where the passengers weren't going to be killed anyways.

but, IF they shot it down, then by the time they would've released that knowledge to the public, the next day or so, they would've known that the plane was far off course, with its transponder turned off, and that 3 other similar planes were used as weapons.

if on 9/13 the government confirmed that they shot down flight 93, i believe it would've helped the administration.

i can't see why they would want to risk a coverup, when the actual action would've been largely viewed as a positive.