Tweet
He was drunk, shot someone in the face. They needed to wait a day to get the story straight and let his body detox from the booze.
Yoo bad no one filled in the victim.
Yoo bad no one filled in the victim.
-
Stay Frosty, muthas! -
Where's the proof he was drunk?Comment
-
There will never be proof that he was drunk, and you know it. If he was drunk, only the people at the ranch know it, and being the good sheep that they are, they sure as hell won't say anything.Originally posted by Warham
Where's the proof he was drunk?
If he wasn't drunk, then why did Cheney and crew treat this like a matter of national security instead of treating it like a hunting accident?Comment
-
Maybe he just wanted to get his rocks off and figured"Ahhh,Whitington(sp)is old,anyway,Ill just cap that mother-fucker".And,besides,any AMERICAN worth his salt knows the effective range of ANY shotgun,let alone one loaded with birdshot.Are we so fucking naive to believe that a man that has been responsible for sending who KNOWS how many to their death,isnt capable of offing someone up-close and personal?It may be just that.The blood-lust isnt satisfied unless he can actually "feel" the kill.And before any of you try to slam me on this,tell me:How did you feel the FIRST time you killed someone,and became GOD?Comment
-
They didn't treat it like a matter of national security.Originally posted by blueturk
There will never be proof that he was drunk, and you know it. If he was drunk, only the people at the ranch know it, and being the good sheep that they are, they sure as hell won't say anything.
If he wasn't drunk, then why did Cheney and crew treat this like a matter of national security instead of treating it like a hunting accident?Comment
-
Yes they did. It was a typical con coverup. Had that been you or me or anyone here, we'd be charged with at the very least, dangerous use of a weapon. But Dickhead gets off and it's covered up.Stay Frosty, muthas!Comment
-
Hannibal! It's YOU!Originally posted by Macu
Maybe he just wanted to get his rocks off and figured"Ahhh,Whitington(sp)is old,anyway,Ill just cap that mother-fucker".And,besides,any AMERICAN worth his salt knows the effective range of ANY shotgun,let alone one loaded with birdshot.Are we so fucking naive to believe that a man that has been responsible for sending who KNOWS how many to their death,isnt capable of offing someone up-close and personal?It may be just that.The blood-lust isnt satisfied unless he can actually "feel" the kill.And before any of you try to slam me on this,tell me:How did you feel the FIRST time you killed someone,and became GOD?
Last edited by blueturk; 02-17-2006, 10:08 PM.Comment
-
I want proof of these claims.
P-R-O-O-F!Comment
-
Proof? Okay...I'll be right back after talking with the CIA and FBI and all that. Those guys are sure to be very cooperative.
I love it. Clinton gets a hummer from a fat chick and cons go crazy, but Cheney nearly blows a guy's head off, and it's no biggie.....Stay Frosty, muthas!Comment
-
How do I know you have a valid observation if you don't have ANY proof? How do I know you aren't just pulling it out of your ass? First, he's drinking a beer, then it's a 40oz'er, then it's a bottle of Vodka...That's why I need proof.
Should I also believe the nuts who claim Franklin Roosevelt met aliens from Mars in 1933, just because they said so?
Clinton's act was intentional, Cheney's was not.Last edited by Warham; 02-17-2006, 10:20 PM.Comment
-
I dont know what you mean by that,buuuuuuuut,I think it demonstrates you have a sense of humor.Soooooo,to be nice,if you allow me to dis-embowel you,I wont murder your wife.Originally posted by blueturk
Hannibal! It's YOU!
(its a joke,if no one saw the movie)
Comment
-
Who's life did Clinton threaten with his act? Cons went bezerk over that coverup, but they deny any coverup in the entire G.W. mandate.Originally posted by Warham
How do I know you have a valid observation if you don't have ANY proof? How do I know you aren't just pulling it out of your ass? First, he's drinking a beer, then it's a 40oz'er, then it's a bottle of Vodka...That's why I need proof.
Should I also believe the nuts who claim Franklin Roosevelt met aliens from Mars in 1933, just because they said so?
Clinton's act was intentional, Cheney's was not.Stay Frosty, muthas!Comment
-
Seems you'd like someone to murder your wife Macu.Originally posted by Macu
I dont know what you mean by that,buuuuuuuut,I think it demonstrates you have a sense of humor.Soooooo,to be nice,if you allow me to dis-embowel you,I wont murder your wife. (its a joke,if no one saw the movie)
Stay Frosty, muthas!Comment
-
See, you are making the assertion that there's some SUBSTANCE to this whole Cheney thing besides what the sheriff, Cheney, AND Whittington have all reported to the media.
With Clinton, you had Paula Jones, Linda Tripp, and then Lewinski bring PROOF that they had something.
Who's that in this case?Comment
-
Yeah.....we know that this is the same thing. A spurned chick & a fat conniving cunt. Those people are on the same level of security as the Secret service and the sherrif. We'll see the SS on Larry King giving details tomorrow won't we?
And WHAT a job of investigation they did too....A day? Day and a half? There was months of investigation into the allegations of a blowjob, but a day into Cheney nearly blowing his friend away. So, where are the blood tests? Will they be accurate? Were there even any done? I doubt it, because the SS made sure to not let this get out until he sobered up. But when you leave your jizz on a chick's dress, and she keeps it on the advice of a fat pig, who's trying to bring down a prez......
It's a little different in terms of chain of command.Stay Frosty, muthas!Comment
Comment