Milosevic found dead

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nickdfresh
    SUPER MODERATOR

    • Oct 2004
    • 49567

    #31
    Originally posted by Lqskdiver

    Oh, I don't know...pretty much every Tom, Nick, and Ford who claim the administration made a mistake going into Iraq, yet supported the ousting and finally death of another genocide dictator.


    BULL-SHIT!!!!

    This post was the one that turned a joyous "ding-dong, the bitch is dead" thread into some half-assed partisan Clinton sucks thread...

    Originally posted by Roy Munson
    Here's a poster for you to pick from...

    If I'm wrong correct me... Somehow I think you won't though.

    Clinton did shit but Wag the Dog to keep MonicaGate out of the news. Monthly, bombings...please. These things were so tightly scheduled, the Iraqies laughed when that time of the month came because they knew exactly which building to evacuate so as to not be in the way.
    Oh, there we go. When Clinton decides to not use military force, he's a pussy-wimp that lets dictators/terrorists reign. But when he does drop bombs, he's "wagging the dog?" Can't have it both ways sunshine!

    Dude, you're so full of shit, it's not funny...

    Bubba: Ok, folks, be sure to leave the area in case you get hit by some falling debris. Wouldn't want you folks to get hurt and all. You too, Saddam. Say hello to the Missus for me.
    Oh golly, you mean he didn't enjoy killing Iraqi civilians while "liberating" them? Boy oh boy, another great cuntradiction you made...

    Actually, SAM and AAA batteries were targeted, so he weakened the infrastructure of the Iraqi military, and attacked whatever WMD sites were left, effectively destroying all of them, assuming the Iraqis didn't do it themselves...

    My whole point is that the Clinton administration supported NATO in their fight against Milo. When he was finally brought down everyone hailed it as a victory towards democracy. It took some time, but it finally transpired.
    No. Actually, CLINTON LED NATO IN THE FIGHT AGAINST MILSOVEC!! He single handily shamed Europe into not standing by and watching the mini-WWII repeat itself, as Islamic fundamentalist guerrillas were beginning to take advantage of N. American/European inaction...

    He was only doing what the first BUSH did in reagards to KUWAIT. Clinton helped liberate nations under attack during a bloody civil war...

    In Iraqi you have the same the situation where the people themselves welcomed the topple of their dictatorship. As always their is opposition and continual support from loyalists who do not want change of power.
    They did huh? Then why are "they" killing our troops in a bloody occupation?

    Yet, we condemn the US actions as treasonous and unwarranted.

    How is this different from Kosovo?
    Because the actions in Iraq were all based on a lie/mistake. Little was said about "liberating" Iraqis and "spreading freedom" until everything went to shit and we didn't find WMDs, which was what it was all about....

    We never sent ground troops into Kosovo until the SERB military pulled out.

    The whole Iraq War was about exploiting 9/11 with the knee-jerk fear propagated by those in power to secure our oil rights before CHINA could move in...

    I ask, should we have left well alone in hopes that the UN would finally grow the testicular fortitude to do something about Iraq as is now the case with Iran?
    Yeah, it's all the UNs fault...

    Oh course they're undermined at every opportunity here, but hey, we need someone to scapegoat...

    BTW, answer the question:

    Who actually ousted Milosevic again?
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 03-12-2006, 09:25 PM.

    Comment

    Working...