Apple moving it's R&D to India

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cathedral
    ROTH ARMY ELITE
    • Jan 2004
    • 6621

    #16
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Which was why I stated he wasn't innocent, but in fact NAFTA goes back to the Reagan Administration in the initial rumblings around 87'. And the Congress was controlled by Republicans as well, and they would have pursued the CLINTON-Is-Anti-Business attack line. That being said, NAFTA was about North America, refresh my geography since INDIA and CHINA are a ways away. NAFTA also failed to deliver on the promise to lift-up Mexico and other Central/South American states and to reduce illegal immigration as well...
    That's because it wasn't a "FAIR" deal to begin with and Reagan knew it. that's why in his 8 year term it was never put through.

    Bush Sr., HE'S the tool that wanted it and was poised to impose it on us in his second term, the one that never came.

    But at least you admit that Clinton took it upon himself to play politics and shit on the American worker.
    When the company I worked for clsoed it's doors because of outsourcing and my ass was out of a job it didn't look to me like Clinton was Anti-Business, it looked to me that he wanted to take a shit on those who busted their ass in manufacturing to make a living and feed their family.

    The shit that it caused was very real to me, bro, and i don't give a shit who's idea it was, it was a bad one that someone should have put a stop to. playing politics is no damned excuse.

    If i had known about Jr. and the Cafta deal, that would have turned me away from voting for him in 2000 all by itself.

    Comment

    Working...