NY Times: Now The Word To Describe Chimpy In Latest Poll: "Incompetent"...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blueturk
    Veteran
    • Jul 2004
    • 1883

    #31
    Originally posted by Cathedral
    I never once typed that he was competent, don't assume things i don't say, or type as it were, lol.

    I think he's a tool, but he's the President and i respect the office, just like when a Democrat i think is incompetent is in there.
    If you think it's "funny" to call Bush incompetent, then I can only assume you think otherwise. As for your Britney-esque "I respect the president no matter who it is" position, that's your problem....

    Comment

    • blueturk
      Veteran
      • Jul 2004
      • 1883

      #32
      Originally posted by Cathedral
      It's ankle biting when you constantly attack the mis-spoken word of someone who is such a criminal you can't charge him with any crimes.

      That whole burdon of proof thing kind of pisses y'all off, don't it?
      It doesn't piss me off. I don't entertain any notions that Dubya will be impeached. I just think that Bush is ridiculously underqualified for his job, and there's plenty of proof of that...

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49570

        #33
        Funny thing is, Republicans are doing more talking about censuring BUSH/Impeachment, as sort a campaign issue with their base. Sort of: "Mindlessly support us, or the Democrats will hold Dumbya accuntable..."

        Comment

        • Warham
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Mar 2004
          • 14589

          #34
          Originally posted by LoungeMachine
          Not the part of the PC I was speaking of, besides, the AUDIO is never the same as the WH TRANSCRIPT.

          If you believe everything that is put out by the WH Press Office, you're a schmuck

          LISTEN closer.....
          It's not from the White House, but nice try there, Kip.

          Comment

          • Warham
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Mar 2004
            • 14589

            #35
            Originally posted by Nickdfresh
            Funny thing is, Republicans are doing more talking about censuring BUSH/Impeachment, as sort a campaign issue with their base. Sort of: "Mindlessly support us, or the Democrats will hold Dumbya accuntable..."
            And the Democrats only ploy is to ask their constituents to vote for them so that they can try to impeach Bush, which will never happen.

            Comment

            • Warham
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Mar 2004
              • 14589

              #36
              Originally posted by Nickdfresh
              And the fact is that many Republicans think BUSH is an incompetent douche tube, and are now jumping ship in efforts to disassociate with him...
              Same thing happened in '98 and Clinton. Was he incompetent back then?

              Comment

              • Warham
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Mar 2004
                • 14589

                #37
                Originally posted by blueturk
                It doesn't piss me off. I don't entertain any notions that Dubya will be impeached. I just think that Bush is ridiculously underqualified for his job, and there's plenty of proof of that...
                Underqualified by being a former governor of a large state?

                Reminds me of somebody else, except he wasn't from a large state.

                Comment

                • Cathedral
                  ROTH ARMY ELITE
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 6621

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Guitar Shark
                  OK. What's the Republicans' stance on campaign finance reform?

                  Deficit spending?

                  Immigration reform?

                  They can't agree on what to do about campaign finance reform and you know it. that is a trick question.
                  but ask me what "MY" stance is on it?

                  All funds from corporations should be cut out. no corporation should be able to buy any politician because THAT is not fair and equal representation of anyone but them, and it's wrong.
                  But every piece of legislation that has been tried has been attacked and stalled.
                  I'm not happy about it at all.

                  Deficit Spending?
                  We're at war, so i don't think there is much that can be done about that, unless you think a tax increase is the answer which I don't agree with. raising taxes will only stall the economy because it will not grow if people tighten their wallets and stop spending.

                  Immigration Reform?
                  Another trick question because you know damn well what Bush's stance is on it.
                  he needs the immigrants to inflate the job creation numbers. as long as they keep crossing the border and taking these new jobs he's claiming he has created, nobody will discover that those jobs are lower wage jobs basically designed for the illegal immigrants and to generate a phony snap shot of his job creation ability.

                  The jobs numbers don't accurately represent the americans, therefore he is right when he says the country needs open borders and immigrant workers.
                  it's all bullshit. He's the one that needs open borders to hide the fact that the american workers are losing ground in the big picture.

                  This countries strength has always been Manufacturing, but in the last several years those jobs have declined drastically and been replaced with lower wage service jobs.

                  In the coming years we'll see how bad the hit is from Cafta, the bastardized brother of Nafta.

                  Comment

                  • Nickdfresh
                    SUPER MODERATOR

                    • Oct 2004
                    • 49570

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Warham
                    And the Democrats only ploy is to ask their constituents to vote for them so that they can try to impeach Bush, which will never happen.
                    But they aren't, are they? You yourself said as much in your RUSS FEINGOLD Thread...

                    Almost no Democrats are talking about this.

                    Comment

                    • Nickdfresh
                      SUPER MODERATOR

                      • Oct 2004
                      • 49570

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Warham
                      Same thing happened in '98 and Clinton. Was he incompetent back then?
                      I dunno,' let's have a poll on it...

                      Comment

                      • Warham
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 14589

                        #41
                        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                        But they aren't, are they? You yourself said as much in your RUSS FEINGOLD Thread...

                        Almost no Democrats are talking about this.
                        Not in public. In their smoked filled rooms, I'm sure it's the rage.

                        They won't talk about it in public because it's political suicide right now. Censuring a war-time president is unheard of.

                        Comment

                        • Cathedral
                          ROTH ARMY ELITE
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 6621

                          #42
                          Originally posted by blueturk
                          If you think it's "funny" to call Bush incompetent, then I can only assume you think otherwise. As for your Britney-esque "I respect the president no matter who it is" position, that's your problem....
                          Na, it isn't calling him that that is "funny", and i don't recall using that word either.
                          Whats "funny" is how every week you Libs have a different name to call the opposition.
                          Actually it isn't "funny", it's "childish".

                          Britney-esque?
                          Not hardly and you didn't read what i typed correctly.
                          I didn't say i respected the "President", I said i respect the "Office" of President.
                          That says nothing about whether i "respect" what "The Man" does, and THAT is what Britney said.

                          Damn, is reading comprehension that tough a concept?

                          How about this line, "If you can get him impeached, i support it!"

                          Though i don't think it is wise to cut off one head on a beast with 7 of them.
                          Any action taken should remove the entire Administration or things will just get worse.

                          How's it go: "keep the enemy you know and fear the one you don't!"

                          Comment

                          • blueturk
                            Veteran
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 1883

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Cathedral
                            Incompetence, that's really funny when you consider that every Democrat right now is spouting a different message.....
                            So what's funny then?
                            Last edited by blueturk; 03-21-2006, 09:02 PM.

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49570

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Warham
                              Not in public. In their smoked filled rooms, I'm sure it's the rage.


                              Uh huh. Making it up now...

                              They won't talk about it in public because it's political suicide right now. Censuring a war-time president is unheard of.
                              Oh Jesus, he's hiding behind a big war now? Despite the fact he's completely incompetent... Yup, incompetent leaders are grate in time of "war." (Even though we haven't really declared a war.)

                              Comment

                              • Cathedral
                                ROTH ARMY ELITE
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 6621

                                #45
                                Ok, remove that word and put the word "ironic".

                                Comment

                                Working...