Iran Fires Missile That Can Evade Radar

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blueturk
    Veteran
    • Jul 2004
    • 1883

    Iran Fires Missile That Can Evade Radar

    Don't worry about it. No problem. We got Saddam. Nothing else matters...


    Iran fires missile that can evade radar

    By Parinoosh Arami
    Reuters
    Friday, March 31, 2006; 9:48 AM

    TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's armed forces on Friday successfully test fired a domestically produced missile which can evade radar, state television reported, a development analysts said could be worrying for Western forces in the Gulf.

    Western nations have been watching developments in Iran's missile capabilities with concern amid a standoff over the Iranian nuclear program, which the West says is aimed at building atomic bombs. Iran says the program is civilian.


    "The missile command of the air force of the Revolutionary Guards has successfully tested a new generation of missiles," Hossein Salami, head of the Revolutionary Guards air force, told state television.

    "This missile can evade radar and it can evade anti-missile missiles," he said.

    "This technology is completely new, without copying any other missile systems that may exist in other countries," he said, adding that the missile could carry multiple warheads.

    Television had said the type of missile tested was called Fajr-3 but Salami did not name the new weapon or give the missile's range, saying it depended on the warhead weight. He said it was a defensive weapon.

    The U.S.-based military affairs Web site globalsecurity.org describes the Fajr-3 as a 240 mm artillery rocket with a 25-mile range, one of a group of light rockets Iran has developed mainly for tactical use on the battlefield.

    However, it also says Iran has been working on another missile, called the Kosar, that would be undetectable by radar and designed to sink ships in the Gulf.

    "WORRYING FOR WEST"

    Accompanying the report of the test, state television showed footage of a single missile being launched from land. The television report also described it as a "long-range missile."

    Iranian officials could not be reached for more details.

    Lee Willett, head of the military capabilities program at London's Royal United Services Institute, a defense think-tank, said the missile could be a worry for Western navies in the Gulf, wary of threats that could cut off shipping lanes.

    "It is potentially a significant issue for coalition forces in the Gulf because there is a very important focus amongst the coalition navies on maritime security operations both at and from the sea, with a particular interest in what is happening from Iran," Willett said.

    The test was part of a week of Iranian naval manoeuvres that started on Friday and were due to take place in the Gulf and Sea of Oman. Ground and air forces are also taking part in the wargames to show Iran's "defensive capabilities," the official IRNA news agency reported.

    Diplomats in Europe said this month that Iran was stepping up development of missiles capable of carrying atomic warheads. An Iranian official denied the charge.

    The diplomats, citing an intelligence report, said the program included plans to arm Iran's Shahab-3 missiles, which experts believe has a maximum range of around 2,000 km (1,240 miles), with nuclear warheads.

    Experts say North Korea has been key to Iran's missile development. A German diplomat in February said Iran has purchased 18 disassembled BM-25 missiles with a range of about 2,500 km from North Korea.

    The Iranian exiled opposition group, the National Council of Resistance in Iran, has also said Iran was working on developing so-called Ghadr missiles, with a range of up to 3,000 km (1,864 miles).

    (Additional reporting by Peter Graff in London)


  • bueno bob
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Jul 2004
    • 22951

    #2
    Oh, a spectacular development, to be sure...
    Twistin' by the pool.

    Comment

    • blueturk
      Veteran
      • Jul 2004
      • 1883

      #3
      Indeed! Much more spectacular than Saddam Hussein's weapons....

      "Iran would be dangerous if they have a nuclear weapon." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., June 18, 2003
      Last edited by blueturk; 04-01-2006, 08:36 PM.

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49567

        #4
        They also have an extremely fast torpedo that can supposedly get through most of our counter-measures, and oh yeah, those terror cells...

        Comment

        • EAT MY ASSHOLE
          Veteran
          • Feb 2006
          • 1887

          #5
          Okay, so...what do you want to do about it?

          Take military measures? Or, no, sit back and only get involved after we've already been struck?
          RIM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • blueturk
            Veteran
            • Jul 2004
            • 1883

            #6
            Originally posted by Nickdfresh
            They also have an extremely fast torpedo that can supposedly get through most of our counter-measures, and oh yeah, those terror cells...

            April 3, 2006
            Iran Says It Test-Fired Underwater Missile
            By NAZILA FATHI
            TEHRAN, April 2 — Iran said Sunday that it had test-fired what it described as a sonar-evading underwater missile just two days after it announced that it had fired a new missile that could carry multiple warheads and evade radar systems.

            The new missile is among the world's fastest and can outpace an enemy warship, Gen. Ali Fadavi of the country's elite Revolutionary Guards told state television.

            General Fadavi said only one other country, Russia, had a missile that moved underwater as fast as the Iranian one, which he said had a speed of about 225 miles per hour. State television showed what it described as the missile being fired.

            "The missile carries a very powerful warhead that enables it to operate against groups of warships and big submarines," he said.

            He contended that the boats that would launch the missile were able to evade detection systems but that "even if an enemy's warship sonar can detect the missile, no warship can escape from this missile because of its high speed."

            General Fadavi said the missile launched Sunday took six years to develop.

            The test, as well as the one described Friday, was part of a week of naval maneuvers. State television showed the missile as it was fired. The news agency IRNA said the maneuvers were to display "the country's defensive capabilities."

            Iran's military show of force follows increasing international pressure over its nuclear program. Last Wednesday, the United Nations Security Council urged Iran to suspend its uranium-enrichment activities and asked the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency to report on Iran's compliance within 30 days.

            Iran has refused to comply. On Sunday, Iran's representative to the atomic energy agency, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, appearing on CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer," said of the Security Council's action, "We express our regret for such a hasty decision because the wisest decision was no action."

            The state television video broadcast Sunday showed crew members on a submarine and described them as preparing to launch the missile. Another film clip showed what was described as the missile being fired from the deck of a ship and diving into the water.

            The Revolutionary Guards air force chief called the antiradar missile that was test-fired Friday "a very advanced missile."

            Mr. Soltanieh, told CNN on Sunday that he did not believe that the weapon could carry a nuclear warhead. "The world should not worry because any country has its own self-defense conventional military activities," he said.

            Comment

            • EAT MY ASSHOLE
              Veteran
              • Feb 2006
              • 1887

              #7
              Originally posted by blueturk
              April 3, 2006
              Iran Says It Test-Fired Underwater Missile
              Funny...didn't Saddam Hussein once say he had weapons of mass destruction?
              RIM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

              Comment

              • blueturk
                Veteran
                • Jul 2004
                • 1883

                #8
                Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                Okay, so...what do you want to do about it?

                Take military measures? Or, no, sit back and only get involved after we've already been struck?
                The point is that Dubya has no fucking clue about what to do. He invaded Iraq to get Saddam, using WMD's as justification. Now REAL WMD's are staring him in the face, but he's frozen like a deer in the headlights...

                Comment

                • Nickdfresh
                  SUPER MODERATOR

                  • Oct 2004
                  • 49567

                  #9
                  Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                  Funny...didn't Saddam Hussein once say he had weapons of mass destruction?
                  And didn't a bunch of armchair ex-military strategists whisper in the Neo Con's ear that Iraq would be a cake walk, and would only need 50K US troops to finish off?

                  Comment

                  • EAT MY ASSHOLE
                    Veteran
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 1887

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                    And didn't a bunch of armchair ex-military strategists whisper in the Neo Con's ear that Iraq would be a cake walk, and would only need 50K US troops to finish off?
                    okay....SO WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO ABOUT IT??? ATTACK? SIT BACK AND WAIT FOR DIESASTER?

                    SAY IT...
                    RIM ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • Cathedral
                      ROTH ARMY ELITE
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 6621

                      #11
                      Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                      okay....SO WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO ABOUT IT??? ATTACK? SIT BACK AND WAIT FOR DIESASTER?

                      SAY IT...
                      Nope, they're quite happy just to have something else to blame Bush for.
                      Those pesky Dems are great for telling you where you've been...just not where to go or how to get there.

                      Comment

                      • Ally_Kat
                        ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 7612

                        #12
                        I remember a year ago the same people in this thread hinting we should take care of Iran bitching and complaining how Iran was going to be our next war and how wrong it would be to do it.

                        Funny how a year changes things, eh boys?
                        Roth Army Militia

                        Comment

                        • Phil theStalker
                          Full Member Status

                          • Jan 2004
                          • 3843

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
                          They also have an extremely fast torpedo that can supposedly get through most of our counter-measures, and oh yeah, those terror cells...
                          Slap a plasma warhead on either o1ne aff those baybees, and well, there goes the era aff da aircraft carrier, da projection aff a superpower's might anywhere in da werld, and da beginning aff WWIII...and civil war in da U.S., t2oo, Nickdfresshy (r u ready?).


                          Add to Ignore list

                          Comment

                          • kentuckyklira
                            Veteran
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 1776

                            #14
                            Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                            Funny...didn't Saddam Hussein once say he had weapons of mass destruction?
                            Well, he obviously had and used them when he was the USA´s pal.

                            In the last few years Dubya and his bunch of goons were the only one´s saying he had WMDs!
                            http://images.zeit.de/gesellschaft/z...ie-540x304.jpg

                            Comment

                            • kentuckyklira
                              Veteran
                              • Sep 2004
                              • 1776

                              #15
                              Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
                              okay....SO WHAT DO YOU WANT TO DO ABOUT IT??? ATTACK? SIT BACK AND WAIT FOR DIESASTER?

                              SAY IT...
                              How many Iranians have attacked the USA so far??
                              http://images.zeit.de/gesellschaft/z...ie-540x304.jpg

                              Comment

                              Working...