Claim of Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq since 2003 debunked by FOX News

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
As usual, the Liberal Socialist Democrats have nothing to dispute this report but insults. I figured as much when I posted the article.

Did you fail to note my post?

This proves Saddam did not destroy all of his WMD's as he was supposed to. There are still loads of chemical weapons unaccounted for.

Yeah, he failed to destroy his useless weapons found buried in some desert shithole (that he probably didn't even know about)...

By the way, will Sanitationorum win after making these ground breaking, recycled, empty statements? Must be painful to be an incumbent about to receive a severe ass-whipping at the polls. Then again, rumor has it that Santorum might like that kind of thing if it's delivered by some buff dude.

[Nickdfresh]

Hoekstra said the report, completed in April but only declassified now, shows that "there is still a lot about Iraq that we don't fully understand."

Well, I can't dispute that.

The Bush Admin clearly doesn't understand Iraq...

[Terry]

People are welcome to apply retroactive reasoning about why we went into Iraq as much as they like.

Far as I can see it, we were duped into a war with a nation that posed NO SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO AMERICA, whatsoever...

...had no proven links to the terrorists that attacked America on 9/11...

...and we went in with far too few troops, for which the Secretary of Defense is ultimately responsible (nice 'transformation' of the military, Rummy!)

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Terry
People are welcome to apply retroactive reasoning about why we went into Iraq as much as they like.

Far as I can see it, we were duped into a war with a nation that posed NO SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO AMERICA, whatsoever...

...had no proven links to the terrorists that attacked America on 9/11...

...and we went in with far too few troops, for which the Secretary of Defense is ultimately responsible (nice 'transformation' of the military, Rummy!)

C'mon Terry, don't confuse the neocon dummies with your facts and common sense.

[Unchainme]

Yo Cunt, This is a funny cartoon in your profile, Why is your homepage set to cherone.com though?

[FORD]

Originally posted by Unchainme


Yo Cunt, This is a funny cartoon in your profile, Why is your homepage set to cherone.com though?

You mean you didn't know he was Gary?

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Unchainme
[BYo Cunt, This is a funny cartoon in your profile, Why is your homepage set to cherone.com though? [/B]

I am a big smart ass.

[FORD]

What ever happenned to the Church of Cherone anyway?

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
has anyone read Bobg's journal? There's nothing on this site that intrigues me more, but I'm concerned exposure could cause permananent damage to ones higher brain functions.

(no worries there for Brian or hardrock)

oh shit I didn't notice he had a journal. That's probably pretty mind-boggling.

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
As usual, the Liberal Socialist Democrats have nothing to dispute this report but insults. I figured as much when I posted the article.

This proves Saddam did not destroy all of his WMD's as he was supposed to. There are still loads of chemical weapons unaccounted for.

We don't have to, the report disputes itself retard! Didn't you read what kb quoted from it? Oh yeah, you probably didn't read any of it.

[LoungeMachine]

June 22, 2006
Fox News Debunks Santorum's WMD Claim


Mere hours after Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) announced breathlessly at a press conference that “we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,” a FOX news reporter found out that Santorum was hyping a document that describes degraded, pre-1991 munitions already acknowledged and dismissed by the White House’s Iraq Survey Group.


Today, Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) and Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) held a press conference and announced “we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.” Santorum and Hoekstra are hyping a document that describes degraded, pre-1991 munitions that were already acknowledged by the White House’s Iraq Survey Group and dismissed.

Fox News’ Jim Angle contacted the Defense Department who quickly disavowed Santorum and Hoekstra’s claims. A Defense Department official told Angle flatly that the munitions hyped by Santorum and Hoekstra are “not the WMD’s for which this country went to war.”

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Agreed kb. My comment was more along the lines of "I can't believe this article was published." And, secondarily, titled as such.

Clarified.

[Howard Dean]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
I am a big smart ass.

MS. CUNT, I have yet to find one of your posts that have anything to do with "smart" YOU MAKE ME PROUD

[Phil theStalker]

You have da mmmakings f4or 'chemical weapons' right under your kitchen sink.

OMG!

Pssst! Doon't tell Homey Suckurity or they'll arrest da whole fakking cuntry.

[Terry]

Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
has anyone read Bobg's journal? There's nothing on this site that intrigues me more, but I'm concerned exposure could cause permananent damage to ones higher brain functions.

(no worries there for Brian or hardrock)

No, I didn't.

Checked it out.

Just when I think I can half understand what he's saying, he loses me.

It's like a paranoid schitzophrenic off their meds...I can't even agree or disagree with the guy, as I can't quite get what he's saying...

Am sure it all makes perfect sense to him, though, and he probably gets a chuckle at how foolish we all are for not recognizing 'the truth' he speaks inbetween his repeated hand-washings and peeking through window shades to see if the mailman is spying on him.