Osama bin Laden Is Alive And Well...So What?

[jcook11]

Originally posted by bobgnote
I think the point of all this is, GW intends to END UP like JFK! The implication of his follies is tough duty comes, suddenly, to the Service detail, on that fateful morning . . .

Only the stupid think they live forever. Only the deeply demented think GW lives much longer, given his trends.

But on the other hand, maybe ALL OF US will die, for GW;s hold on you and your media and YOUR stupid spins, on all of it.

YOU FARGIN BASTAGE, I'M GONNA CUT OFF YOUR DORK AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR ICEHOLE!

[blueturk]

Originally posted by Warham
He'll look like JFK?

John Kennedy wasn't much better.

Whatever you say, sheep. Here's the official White House biography of JFK. Is the wool over your eyes that fucking thick? Kennedy may not have been the best president of all time, but your statement is just fucking ridiculous.


John Kennedy

On November 22, 1963, when he was hardly past his first thousand days in office, John Fitzgerald Kennedy was killed by an assassin's bullets as his motorcade wound through Dallas, Texas. Kennedy was the youngest man elected President; he was the youngest to die.

Of Irish descent, he was born in Brookline, Massachusetts, on May 29, 1917. Graduating from Harvard in 1940, he entered the Navy. In 1943, when his PT boat was rammed and sunk by a Japanese destroyer, Kennedy, despite grave injuries, led the survivors through perilous waters to safety.

Back from the war, he became a Democratic Congressman from the Boston area, advancing in 1953 to the Senate. He married Jacqueline Bouvier on September 12, 1953. In 1955, while recuperating from a back operation, he wrote Profiles in Courage, which won the Pulitzer Prize in history.

In 1956 Kennedy almost gained the Democratic nomination for Vice President, and four years later was a first-ballot nominee for President. Millions watched his television debates with the Republican candidate, Richard M. Nixon. Winning by a narrow margin in the popular vote, Kennedy became the first Roman Catholic President.

His Inaugural Address offered the memorable injunction: "Ask not what your country can do for you--ask what you can do for your country." As President, he set out to redeem his campaign pledge to get America moving again. His economic programs launched the country on its longest sustained expansion since World War II; before his death, he laid plans for a massive assault on persisting pockets of privation and poverty.

Responding to ever more urgent demands, he took vigorous action in the cause of equal rights, calling for new civil rights legislation. His vision of America extended to the quality of the national culture and the central role of the arts in a vital society.

He wished America to resume its old mission as the first nation dedicated to the revolution of human rights. With the Alliance for Progress and the Peace Corps, he brought American idealism to the aid of developing nations. But the hard reality of the Communist challenge remained.

Shortly after his inauguration, Kennedy permitted a band of Cuban exiles, already armed and trained, to invade their homeland. The attempt to overthrow the regime of Fidel Castro was a failure. Soon thereafter, the Soviet Union renewed its campaign against West Berlin. Kennedy replied by reinforcing the Berlin garrison and increasing the Nation's military strength, including new efforts in outer space. Confronted by this reaction, Moscow, after the erection of the Berlin Wall, relaxed its pressure in central Europe.

Instead, the Russians now sought to install nuclear missiles in Cuba. When this was discovered by air reconnaissance in October 1962, Kennedy imposed a quarantine on all offensive weapons bound for Cuba. While the world trembled on the brink of nuclear war, the Russians backed down and agreed to take the missiles away. The American response to the Cuban crisis evidently persuaded Moscow of the futility of nuclear blackmail.

Kennedy now contended that both sides had a vital interest in stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and slowing the arms race--a contention which led to the test ban treaty of 1963. The months after the Cuban crisis showed significant progress toward his goal of "a world of law and free choice, banishing the world of war and coercion." His administration thus saw the beginning of new hope for both the equal rights of Americans and the peace of the world.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/jk35.html

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine


Then why not just quote those sources?

http://www.americanpresidents.org/survey/historians/

http://www.opinionjournal.com/hail/rankings.html

http://www.siena.edu/sri/results/2002/02AugPresidentsSurvey.htm

That should be sufficient information for your liberal mind to wrap around.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham

That should be sufficient information for your liberal mind to wrap around.

More interesting numbers here:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/02/opinion/polls/main1005327.shtml

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
More interesting numbers here:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/02/opinion/polls/main1005327.shtml

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Dude, your keyboard is stuck.

[4moreyears]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
I'm crushed.

Clinton was a competent and successful president which drives you crazy. Especially when everything that Bush touches turns to shit.

Clinton paid no attention to terrorism. More of the 9-11 attacks should be on his sholders because he did not have proper intelligence of the attack. Also when Clinton was finishing his presidency the stock market started to turn down and jobs started being outsourced at an alarming rate. The next president republican or democrat will have it worse as the market place drives companies to use off shore labor to remain competitive in the global marketplace.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by 4moreyears
Clinton paid no attention to terrorism. More of the 9-11 attacks should be on his sholders because he did not have proper intelligence of the attack. Also when Clinton was finishing his presidency the stock market started to turn down and jobs started being outsourced at an alarming rate. The next president republican or democrat will have it worse as the market place drives companies to use off shore labor to remain competitive in the global marketplace.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.02/

If you can recall, 911 happened on Bush's watch. According to Richard Clarke (who worked for the last FOUR Presidents) it was in fact the Bush Administration that did noting about terror.

It's been 6 fucking years since Clinton was President. The "Blame Clinton" song you neocons keep singing sounds more out of tune with each passing day....and deep down inside you know it.

Sean Hannity wants is talking points back. Pathetic.

[4moreyears]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.02/

If you can recall, 911 happened on Bush's watch. According to Richard Clarke (who worked for the last FOUR Presidents) it was in fact the Bush Administration that did noting about terror.

It's been 6 fucking years since Clinton was President. The "Blame Clinton" song you neocons keep singing sounds more out of tune with each passing day....and deep down inside you know it.

Sean Hannity wants is talking points back. Pathetic.

Dumb ass the first attack happened under Clinton in 93. He did not stop it, it just failed. Even though the attack happened under Bush the majority of the planning took place while he was president. IT is not blame Clinton these are facts. Put your Clinton Kool Aid down.

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/20/us.strikes.02/

If you can recall, 911 happened on Bush's watch. According to Richard Clarke (who worked for the last FOUR Presidents) it was in fact the Bush Administration that did noting about terror.

It's been 6 fucking years since Clinton was President. The "Blame Clinton" song you neocons keep singing sounds more out of tune with each passing day....and deep down inside you know it.

Sean Hannity wants is talking points back. Pathetic.

According to Richard Clarke?

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by 4moreyears
Dumb ass the first attack happened under Clinton in 93. He did not stop it, it just failed. Even though the attack happened under Bush the majority of the planning took place while he was president. IT is not blame Clinton these are facts. Put your Clinton Kool Aid down.

So, if it happened in 93 the planning must have started under Reagan, therefore Clinton can accept none of the blame. Right?

Silly Bush apologist. You are so full of bullshit it is leaking out of your ears.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
According to Richard Clarke?

Yeah, he is someone with a bit more knowledge on the subject of terrorism than you and Sean Hannity combined.

Don't shoot the messenger just because you don't like what he has to say. That's a total pussy republican thing to do.

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
Yeah, he is someone with a bit more knowledge on the subject of terrorism than you and Sean Hannity combined.

Don't shoot the messenger just because you don't like what he has to say. That's a total pussy republican thing to do.

Should I believe Sandy Bergler and Madame Albright as well?

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
Should I believe Sandy Bergler and Madame Albright as well?

Not if they are saying things that you don't want to hear. Remember, you are a neocon and avoiding the truth is job #1.

Just tuck your soft little head in between your Mama's titties to muffle out all the naughty people talking bad about the President.

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
Not if they are saying things that you don't want to hear. Remember, you are a neocon and avoiding the truth is job #1.

Just tuck your soft little head in between your Mama's titties to muffle out all the naughty people talking bad about the President.

No, it's more like because they are liars, like their president before them.

He's still got the record for the most impeached, indicted, and convicted administration ever.

Why should I believe anything one of them says?