For Democrats’ Hopes, Less Promise in New York

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LoungeMachine
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Jul 2004
    • 32576

    #76
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Firstly, I don't recall any definitive statements of the above about the "Dems gaining power" in November. You're the one with the hard-on for verbal gymnastics and turning this into some sort of semantic pissing match.

    What particular issue do you find the Republicans so overweeningly superior on? What gives you such an erection over the idea of the Republicans retaining control of the the House and Senate?


    Alas, this is what we're left with in here.....

    Semantics and wordplay in place of any real stances on the issues....

    I'd love to hear her list of accomplishments and plans for future "victories" for this administration


    Maybe they're right. If sadaist is the best the RIGHT can offer in here these days......this place is doomed.

    She makes 4moreyears and wifebeater sound brilliant.

    *sigh*
    Originally posted by Kristy
    Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
    Originally posted by cadaverdog
    I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

    Comment

    • LoungeMachine
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Jul 2004
      • 32576

      #77
      Originally posted by Nickdfresh
      Congratulations on your ability to use the edit function. That's exactly what it said.
      yep
      Originally posted by Kristy
      Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
      Originally posted by cadaverdog
      I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

      Comment

      • sadaist
        TOASTMASTER GENERAL
        • Jul 2004
        • 11625

        #78
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Congratulations on your ability to use the edit function. That's exactly what it said.
        Nope. I never said the Democrats would "retain" power. Even when you quoted me and called me out for it, it doesn't say "retain". The post you referred to also shows no edits. You have to make things up to try and come out ahead in an argument? Stop trying to make yourself out to be as smart as you think you are. One of the first signs of idiocy is claiming intelligence over others.



        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        LOL Read a headline or two War, you're not very bright are you?
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh


        Jesus, Sadist, are you that dumb
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh

        and I'm pretty fucking smart actually.
        “Great losses often bring only a numb shock. To truly plunge a victim into misery, you must overwhelm him with many small sufferings.”

        Comment

        • Nickdfresh
          SUPER MODERATOR

          • Oct 2004
          • 49563

          #79
          Originally posted by sadaist
          Nope. I never said the Democrats would "retain" power. Even when you quoted me and called me out for it, it doesn't say "retain".


          But it did say "retain," and if you edit quickly, once, it won't show "edited by..."

          The post you referred to also shows no edits. You have to make things up to try and come out ahead in an argument? Stop trying to make yourself out to be as smart as you think you are. One of the first signs of idiocy is claiming intelligence over others.
          Um, you have yet to show any intelligence, or content knowledge, about anything, other than routinely being a toady for Warham or BBB, and putting up threads you get off www.rightwingtalkingpoints.com

          C'mon man, you didn't even get that article by reading the NYTimes online, you just cherry picked it from a blog without really reading or understanding it. Granted, the writer's poorly informed in the grand scheme on NY politics. Again, you add nothing of substance.

          This whole useless thread can be summed up into: "ha ha! Republicans will beat the Democrats!" Brilliant groundbreaking stuff!

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49563

            #80
            BTW, nice quotes out of context. Figures that you'd leave out the part showing your droning ignorance of the actual facts presented, at least quote the whole sentence asshat.

            Comment

            • ODShowtime
              ROCKSTAR

              • Jun 2004
              • 5812

              #81
              Originally posted by sadaist
              Question:

              If Republicans are so stupid, then explain how the brilliant liberals have not been able to persuade the feeble minded masses to vote Democrat in 20 of the last 28 years of Presidential elections? Logic would dictate that the less intelligent the person, the easier to persuade, correct?
              I don't know what it's gonna take to convince you to keep your mouth shut and stop advertising your stupidity, but you're not yet a lost cause.

              You're sitting here laughing about your very own ass getting cornholed. Unless you own stock in Halliburton.

              What you fail to understand is that the conflict is not about "liberals and conservatives." People who are hoping for a more Democratic legislature are CONSERVATIVE. Because CONSERVATIVE means that you want things to stay the way there are or were. In this case we want the country to cunt-tinue to have seperation of powers and not be a dictatorship. Either you're conservative or fascist. No liberals here. Except for FORD.
              Last edited by ODShowtime; 09-20-2006, 07:58 AM.
              gnaw on it

              Comment

              • Nickdfresh
                SUPER MODERATOR

                • Oct 2004
                • 49563

                #82
                The things Republicans WILL lose!


                Comment

                Working...