If this is your first visit to the Roth Army, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by redfire It's true that the chimpanzee genome is about 95% identical to the human genome. But the major difference between the two genomes is chromosome 2. Chromosome 2 is the second largest human chromosome, spanning more than 237 million base pairs.... 237 million seems like a lot to me. This coming from my Prentice Hall biology textbook.
So you're saying that you accept science when you can spin it for your arguments? And yes, the Chromosomes are obviously different, but the relation is also obviously there.
As for evolution, am I really just suppose to take your word on this?
No. You're supposed to listen and read that most scientists have essentially stopped debating at functions such as schoolboard meetings, because idiot "Intelligent Designers" have masked creationism mythology with pseudo-science, and have attempted to engage in base and Sophist courtroom style theatrical arguments where this kind of behavior has no place. In short, they engage in cherrypicking of the facts.
Why should I just accpet what you've said. Freaking read a text book. And read all the thoughts on evolution, and all the concessions on where it's weak, and all the theories that account for these weaknesses. There are so ####### many excuse to explain the theory of evolution.
All I'm saying is it takes faith for me to believe that all the theories on evolution, and the Big Bang, that every single question to disprove those theories is explained with another hypothetical theory. Either way, we don't know for 100% certain.
Is man perfect? To me, no. There's plenty of evidence to support that. And when you deal with an issue like the origin of everything, you're asking a flawed man to reason and explain. And he can't. That's the bottom line to me.
Everyone that wants to rip Intelligent Design, fine. Go ahead, but go reseach, just buy a ####### textbook, and read all the issues behind evolution. The reasons why it's a possiblity and the arguments against it (from science), and then evolutions response to those arguments. And I think you will see that it's not as bulletproof as some make it.
This is an argument of semantics one could apply to anything. You could sit outside and smoke pot all night and speculate if the Earth is just a dingleberry on God's ass, and call that "faith." But at the end of the day, it comes down to scholarship and specialty. And many "Intelligent Designers" are clearly intellectual frauds promoting religion over scientific thought. They have clearly applied a skepticism" to Evolution that they clearly refuse to apply to their own pseudoscience, or religious belief for that matter. And these include gross fabrications.
BTW, how many scientific conferences on "ID" are there? How many peer-reviewed papers?
Originally posted by LoungeMachine Which is ususally what you'd expect to hear from the Loser :D
Which is what you hear from extremist. People like you are the problem, with your us against them mentality. You don't give a shit about the country as long as your party wins. Soooo Sad, show some tolerance.
Originally posted by scamper Which is what you hear from extremist. People like you are the problem, with your us against them mentality. You don't give a shit about the country as long as your party wins. Soooo Sad, show some tolerance.
LMAO
Yeah, the Republicans are the party of tolerance
And your "you don't give a shit" rant is fucking laughable.
I don't care WHO is in "power", mensa.....
So long as they don't invade, occupy, kill, torture, and steal IN MY NAME.
I also don't want my government spying on ME without a warrant and probable cause.
I also believe in THE BILL OF RIGHTS, and the right of Habeus Corpus.
So know what the fuck you're talking about Skippy.
Originally posted by Nickdfresh And BTW, I am some sort of "believer;" yet I find no contradiction between a God and science, or Evolution. Why do you think Catholics co-opted science into their belief system? This simply gave them a bit more credibility...
Catholics have co-opted a lot of things into their faith they shouldn't have over the last two-thousand years.
Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
Now notice the phony "but...but...but I voted for one Democrat and stuff. I did...I did!" bullshit.
Bitch please!
Now that the stench of defeat hits his party Warhead denies their acquaintance three times before the cock crowed.
Nice try! You ain't fooling us at all!
I know, you can't handle it when people around here split their ticket. I still consider myself a conservative Republican and always will, so I'm not sure what I'm denying, fool.
Do you need a blanket to go along with that bottle, Monkey?
Originally posted by Nickdfresh So you're saying that you accept science when you can spin it for your arguments? And yes, the Chromosomes are obviously different, but the relation is also obviously there.
No, I don't remember saying that, and I don't even think you can imply that. I said I've seen what science has to offer to explain the formation of the world and it's not as matter of fact as a lot of people make. 237 million seems to be quite a bit to just say the relation is there.
No. You're supposed to listen and read that most scientists have essentially stopped debating at functions such as schoolboard meetings, because idiot "Intelligent Designers" have masked creationism mythology with pseudo-science, and have attempted to engage in base and Sophist courtroom style theatrical arguments where this kind of behavior has no place. In short, they engage in cherrypicking of the facts.
And I have listened and read. I've done that, but have you? Look, I don't have a problem with evolution or the Big Bang being taught, it should be. But the fact is, it's not without it's own problems, and I would like to see that the professor's would also teach the scientific arguments against it. I was, and I appreciated it. Then I did my own studies on it, and admittedly had a hard time keeping track of all the rebuttles from evolution. By the way, can you actually tell me what Sophistry is? I just want to make sure you're not repeating an argument from someone else. Now, as for the rest of Christianity... even just people of a religious faith that believe God created everything, I can't speak for them. But for you to say I'm cherry picking facts, is useless because the other side does it too, ie not stating the scientific arguments for many aspects of evolution.
This is an argument of semantics one could apply to anything. You could sit outside and smoke pot all night and speculate if the Earth is just a dingleberry on God's ass, and call that "faith." But at the end of the day, it comes down to scholarship and specialty. And many "Intelligent Designers" are clearly intellectual frauds promoting religion over scientific thought. They have clearly applied a skepticism" to Evolution that they clearly refuse to apply to their own pseudoscience, or religious belief for that matter. And these include gross fabrications.
BTW, how many scientific conferences on "ID" are there? How many peer-reviewed papers?
Prolly none, but the Bible is not a text for explaining the mysteries of the origin of the universe, otherwise it might spend a little bit more talking about that. Rather, it's a text that is a history on God's relationship with mankind and how one can be reconciled to the LORD. How many scientific conferences on "God's salvation to mankind" are there? How many peer-reviewed papers?
The end of the matter is this, does evolution, scientifically, have holes? If it does, you can rail against me for believing YHWH created the word (ironically that name means He causes to be), but it's no different from my faith, that according to science has holes.
Comment