Originally posted by ELVIS
So, all the building blocks of life just happened to be at the right place at the right time for "evolution" to begin...
By chance...
So, all the building blocks of life just happened to be at the right place at the right time for "evolution" to begin...
By chance...
I would argue back two things.
1) The puddle argument. What are the chances of the water in a puddle in a hole in the road being the exact same size as the irregular hole? Of course that's a dumb question because it is coming from the total wrong angle. It's like the thing of saying it's a billion to one for life to start on a planet. The planet needs to be in the exact right place, the three bears theory not too hot not too cold and it needs a moon to stablise it's orbit. Most stars are binary i.e. two suns and they tend to then have too wild orbits to support life because they fuck with each other gravitationally.
Fine.
But this is where the big numbers thing comes in, in the same way as evolution being difficult to grasp because of the millions of years involved.
The current estimate for the number of planets in the universe is a billion billion. That's an insanely big number. That means that if it's a billion to one for life to develop on a planet then there are a billion planets that fit the bill.
If the universe was small and there were a hundred or so stars I think you would have to go with the creator thing because it would be insanely unlikely otherwise. But it isn't. Asking about the 999 999 999 billion dead planets is a non issue because there is noone to ask about the universe on those planets. The fact you are here as a lifeform is just the way it is. If you were a triple eared giant bug made of spaghetti then you would be asking why all the ears? There must be a god because the chances of being made of a spaghetti substance is so low. It's coming at the whole thing from the wrong angle beacause all of this science stuff with huge numbers is totally alien to our brains. Remember that as mammals we have evolved to live in pretty smal groups and to eat and fuck. In evolutionary terms it's only very very very recently we have had to think about stuff like this and our brains aren't naturally good at it.
2) A god creator theory solves absolutely nothing. It doesn't answer any question at all because as I said earlier if so 'Who or what created this god?'. A super creator? Who craeted that? A super super creator? You are totally back where you started except now you have to explain a really complex thing appearing from nowhere as a better explanation than simple things very slowly evolving over time.
Cheers!

Comment