Obama calls Iranian regime a 'threat'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigBadBrian
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    • Jan 2004
    • 10625

    Obama calls Iranian regime a 'threat'

    Obama calls Iranian regime a 'threat'

    By DEANNA BELLANDI, Associated Press Writer
    Fri Mar 2, 4:22 PM ET


    CHICAGO - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) on Friday blamed Bush administration failings in Iraq for strengthening the strategic position of Iran, which he says must be stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons.

    The Illinois senator said that means "direct engagement" with Iran similar to the meetings with the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War.

    "One of the most profound consequences of the administration's failed strategy in Iraq has been to strengthen Iran's strategic position; reduce U.S. credibility and influence in the region; and place Israel and other nations friendly to the United States in greater peril," Obama told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobbying group.

    The Bush administration recently altered its position, with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice saying this week that the U.S. is willing to talk to Iran on security in Iraq.

    Obama also emphasized in his speech his commitment to protecting the security of Israel, which he called "our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy."

    "Our job is to renew the United States' efforts to ... help Israel achieve peace with its neighbors while remaining vigilant against those who do not share that vision," Obama said.

    The speech was the second time in recent months that Obama has formally addressed foreign policy in his hometown of Chicago. In November, Obama called for a reduction of U.S. forces in Iraq at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

    But Obama focused on Iran Friday, calling President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's regime "a threat to all of us."

    A member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama said the world — not just the United States — must stop Iran's uranium enrichment program.

    "While we should take no option, including military action, off the table, sustained and aggressive diplomacy combined with tough sanctions should be our primary means to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons," Obama said.

    Obama said Iranian nuclear weapons would destabilize the region and could set off a new arms race.

    Fellow senator and Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton has warned Bush not to take any military action against Iran without congressional approval.

    Iran has refused to freeze its enrichment-related activities and the U.N. Security Council has imposed sanctions targeting its nuclear and missile programs and persons involved in them.

    Iran has refused to halt its nuclear program, contending it is to provide energy — not weapons — for the country.

    Link
    “If bullshit was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire.” - George W. Bush
  • Nickdfresh
    SUPER MODERATOR

    • Oct 2004
    • 49563

    #2
    What was he supposed to call them?

    Comment

    • Lqskdiver
      Sniper
      • Jun 2004
      • 763

      #3
      Originally posted by Nickdfresh
      What was he supposed to call them?
      "Friends of Dems"

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49563

        #4
        Originally posted by Lqskdiver
        "Friends of Dems"
        And why would that be?

        The Iranian Mullahs should send Bush, Rummy, Wolfieshitz, and the gaggle of incompetent Administration fuckwits, past and present, Ramadan cards...

        And BTW, the Iranian gov't is a friend of "dems," as they increasingly alienate their overall pro-Western, secular population...

        Comment

        • Lqskdiver
          Sniper
          • Jun 2004
          • 763

          #5
          Originally posted by Nickdfresh


          And BTW, the Iranian gov't is a friend of "dems," as they increasingly alienate their overall pro-Western, secular population...
          Live and let live, huh. I guess every third world country deserves the right to unanium enrichment.

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49563

            #6
            Originally posted by Lqskdiver
            Live and let live, huh. I guess every third world country deserves the right to unanium enrichment.
            Well, you apparently believe Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan do...


            "Hypocrite."

            Comment

            • Lqskdiver
              Sniper
              • Jun 2004
              • 763

              #7
              Israel is an ally last I checked...or "Buds of Repubs" if you prefer.

              Comment

              • Nickdfresh
                SUPER MODERATOR

                • Oct 2004
                • 49563

                #8
                So is Pakistan.

                No really! They are!

                But it's okay for US allies to have nukes then?

                Comment

                • Seshmeister
                  ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                  • Oct 2003
                  • 35750

                  #9
                  I guess like every other US candidate Obama needs some Jewish campaign money...

                  Your politicians are owned.

                  Comment

                  • FORD
                    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                    • Jan 2004
                    • 59558

                    #10
                    AIPAC needs to be eliminated from the US political system.

                    The Likud mentality needs to be eliminated from the fucking planet.
                    Eat Us And Smile

                    Cenk For America 2024!!

                    Justice Democrats


                    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                    Comment

                    • Seshmeister
                      ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                      • Oct 2003
                      • 35750

                      #11
                      Can someone explain to me the huge advantage that the people of the US get from their governments unqualified support of Israel.

                      Could someone explain to me why the good people of the US have to send billions of dollars of their money to Israel.

                      Could someone explain to me how it benefits the people of the US to have terrorists killing thousands of people on 9-11 because of their governments policy on Israel.

                      I don't see how the common man in the US benefits from this BS from both parties so the only explanation is that your politicians have been bought.

                      Cheers!

                      Comment

                      • FORD
                        ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                        • Jan 2004
                        • 59558

                        #12
                        Like I said, AIPAC needs to be eliminated from this country.

                        If you want to know what happens to politicians who openly question AIPAC, look at Cynthia McKinney.
                        Eat Us And Smile

                        Cenk For America 2024!!

                        Justice Democrats


                        "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                        Comment

                        • Seshmeister
                          ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                          • Oct 2003
                          • 35750

                          #13
                          Most things are very complicated.

                          The problem with US politics isn't.



                          All that's needed is a simple bill that all candidates get say 5 hours advertising time during elections and broadcasters have to provide that as part of their deal in getting a franchise. That would reduce the cost of elections by 95% overnight.

                          The UK has a fifth of the population of the US but spends 1% that the US does on elections. Even at that at the UK has peoblems too of undue influence but compared to the US it's nothing.

                          Cheers!

                          Comment

                          • LoungeMachine
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 32576

                            #14
                            Let's address why Brie even started this thread.

                            He's talking in the mANN Coulter thread about how the Dems need to find someone "electable", and then he tries to gloat when one of them agrees with him and his Party?

                            Damned if you do.......





                            Doesn't your side consider Iran a threat, Brie?

                            I guarantee you Obama considers another Neo-Con Regime a threat, too.

                            I do.
                            Originally posted by Kristy
                            Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                            Originally posted by cadaverdog
                            I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                            Comment

                            • Seshmeister
                              ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                              • Oct 2003
                              • 35750

                              #15
                              The Iran thing is quite simple. Bush's fuckwit axis of evil crap has given a dodgy government an easy way to get popularity by railing against it.

                              There is no easier way to unite a country than to get it to rally against an outside threat, Just like the threat of outside terrorism has allowed the US and UK government to introduce unacceptable laws. The population of Iran was actually quite secular and forward thinking, The threats of Bush have given their asshole government a lot more popularity and allowed it to become more radicalised.

                              Very basic psychology.

                              Cheers!

                              Comment

                              Working...