Hey Ford, You Watchin' This?

[cadaverdog]

Originally posted by Baby's On Fire
Anti-Religious? Your fucking right.

Anti-American? No. Just anti-dumbass-American. That means you.

And your hero George Bush.

Hail to the chief, mother fucker.

[cadaverdog]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Baby's On Fire
[B] That pic is generated by this site, you fucking moron.

Can I have an avatar of Popeye, he is my real hero.
UG,UG,UG,UG,UG.
I probably misspelled ug.

[FORD]

Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
cadaverdog is right!

See FORD. My theory makes better sense. Are you ready to come to my side of the fence now?

I have no idea what side of the fence you're on.

You started out here claiming to be a "Democrat", but I haven't heard you say anything positive about a Democrat yet.

Granted, there are a lot of so-called "Democrats" who don't deserve it right now.

[PlexiBrown]

Can I have an avatar of Popeye, he is my real hero.

[GO-SPURS-GO]

Originally posted by FORD
I have no idea what side of the fence you're on.

The side that throws rocks at both parties. Come on FORD you’re ignoring my “well thought out” response to your suggestion on page 2 post #45. You don’t want to admit I’m right.

You started out here claiming to be a "Democrat", but I haven't heard you say anything positive about a Democrat yet.

Ahhhhhh...... you remembered that! You’ve posted about 3,000 times after I had said that, great memory you have their FORD. Have you heard me say anything good about Republicans? I’ll set the record straight, so when you guys label me it will be correct. The truth is...... I’m a non-voting “compassionate conservative.” Define that you ask? Okay. That means I’m a “social conservative” and a “fiscal liberal/moderate.” Confused? Let me explain.... I’m anti-porn, abortion, racism, drugs and every form of filth that kids will be exposed to when they grow up and dumped in society. That’s where the compassion comes into play. I will show you why I think the anti-stuff that I’ve listed is wrong, but I’ll never condemn you. I have compassion because I’ve “been there and done that.” My closet is so full of skeletons, and I had to rent a storage facility to store the rest. I was deceived by HeYLeL for 14 years, so I have inside knowledge of his trickery. I’m definitely Pro-YHWH and Eesho Masheekha (Jesus the Christ.) Fiscal “liberal/moderate” means that I’m Pro- giving my/other people’s money to the needy, taxing the greedy and helping the less fortunate but not free handouts. I’m defiantly not a socialist. Add that all up and you get a “Blue Dog Democrat.” So there you go.... there should be no more confusion around here. From now on I won’t be accepting the following labels my friends around here have put on me. Neo-cunt, Chimpy Worshiper, right wing fascist, Freeper and a Limbaugh lover. The following labels are accepted. A religious nut, Jesus jerk, a fairytale believer and a Christian fascist.:D


Granted, there are a lot of so-called "Democrats" who don't deserve it right now.

Know any Blue Dog Democrats running for president? I don’t! All of them are left winged lunatics. Let me know if there is I might vote them.

[FORD]

Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
Know any Blue Dog Democrats running for president? I don’t! All of them are left winged lunatics. Let me know if there is I might vote them

Left wing lunatics??

Kucinich would be considered a centrist in most other alleged Democracies. Edwards and Obama would probably be considered conservatives, Hillary and Biden right wing extremists, and the neocons would be in prison for treason.

I'm still waiting for Gore to jump in, but if he doesn't do so in the next month or so, then it probably isn't happening.

And God help us all, if that's the case.

[Angel]

Originally posted by thome
Mother Fukking Canada must be just the best place eva .

Damn straight! :D

[Warham]

Hillary will be your 2008 Democratic nominee, and she will have no chance in hell of winning a general election, unless the Clinton War Machine® gets down and dirty.

Her disapproval rating I believe is the highest ever for a major presidential candidate.

[GO-SPURS-GO]

Originally posted by WAR
Hillary will be your 2008 Democratic nominee, and she will have no chance in hell of winning a general election.

The main two reasons why Bush won the 2004 election is because he got 42 percent of the Hispanic vote and majority of the Christian vote. With all these republican gay sex scandals and the Emigration fiasco, most of those votes wont be there for any republican nominee. You think really think conservative republicans will vote for the cross-dressing, pro-choice/gay marriage Rudy Giuliani?

unless the Clinton War Machine® gets down and dirty.

That 500 million dollars will go to good use, trust me on that. She will put Obama on the ticket and she will cruise to a victory. I guarantee it. Well.... I won’t guarantee it, because I don’t want John Edwards to sue if she doesn’t win.

[/QUOTE]

[FORD]

The Republicans have both 8 years of Chimp damage AND a ridiculously weak group of candidates running. Any decent Democrat should be able to win a fair election in a landslide that would make Nixon's rotting corpse jealous.

Unfortunately, between the whore media, the electro-fraud machines, and the possibility of the DLC forcing the AIPAC queen down our throats, the election will be anything but fair.

I'm not sure Hillary is a done deal yet though. Obviously she's the corporatists' intended candidate, just as Judas IsKerryot was in 2004, but I'm hopeful that people are a little wiser to the whore media than they were then.

[FORD]

Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
That 500 million dollars will go to good use, trust me on that. She will put Obama on the ticket and she will cruise to a victory. I guarantee it. Well.... I won’t guarantee it, because I don’t want John Edwards to sue if she doesn’t win.

The winning ticket, out of the so-called "Top 3" Democratic frontrunners of the moment, would be Edwards/Obama.

Not Hillary. I don't know a single Democrat who plans on voting for her in the caucus. The DLC-bots who feed the reports to the whore media show her "far ahead" in the polls, but they never say who they are polling.

If they're polling corporations and AIPAC shills, Hillary's probably leading there.

If they were polling rank and file Democrats, not a chance in Hell.

In fact, Thom Hartmann pointed out recently on his radio program that it was Edwards, not Hillary or Obama, that was polling the best against Republicans like Guiliani or Twit Romney.

[GO-SPURS-GO]

Originally posted by FORD

John Edwards


not a chance in Hell.

Hillary is HeYLel's top choice.

between the whore media,

You mean this whore media?
[url]http://www.newsmeat.com/media_political_donations/


the electro-fraud machines

You mean the same fraudulent machines that Hugo Chavez builds and uses?

I see you're still ignoring my other post to you on this thread.

Here is the working link to your whore media.

http://www.newsmeat.com/media_political_donations/

Why would I vote for this pompous arrogant anti-Christian idiot.

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2AE847UXu3Q"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2AE847UXu3Q" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

[Nickdfresh]

Two questions:

How dare you fuckers hijack my 9/11-fight thread to discuss presidential electoral politics?

And Go-Spurs-Go, am I wrong in assuming that Clinton most closely represents you politics (ie conservative Democrat?)

[Warham]

John Edwards spends more time on his hair than most women.

[cadaverdog]

I

Originally posted by FORD
The winning ticket, out of the so-called "Top 3" Democratic frontrunners of the moment, would be Edwards/Obama.

Not Hillary. I don't know a single Democrat who plans on voting for her in the caucus. The DLC-bots who feed the reports to the whore media show her "far ahead" in the polls, but they never say who they are polling.

If they're polling corporations and AIPAC shills, Hillary's probably leading there.

If they were polling rank and file Democrats, not a chance in Hell.

In fact, Thom Hartmann pointed out recently on his radio program that it was Edwards, not Hillary or Obama, that was polling the best against Republicans like Guiliani or Twit Romney.

I f you think the dems are going to save the day ,you are sadly mistaken .
Do you really think any of them cares about the common man?
They are no better or worse than the republicans , they both have their hidden agendas.
If one party said shit stinks the other would say it didn't.
Niether party is without assholes .
One has Bush , the other has Ted Kennedy .
Ted killed some poor girl in the 60s.He might even have murdered her because he got her pregnant.
Some think LBJ had JFK killed.
Clinton pardoned some convicts in his last hours in office for some quick cash.
Al gore wanted to restrict free speech in the recording industry.
Most politicians are criminal some have not been caught red handed.
Until a truly independant candidate with no political debts steps forward it probably will not get any better for the common man.