RAW STORY: Fred Thompson: Dissent makes US 'weak,' carries 'heavy price'

[Ellyllions]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
I'll say it again....

THIS crop of Republican candidates is the weakest bunch of chattle they've laid out in 60 years.

And I'll wholeheartedly agree with you on that point.

[BITEYOASS]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
The "warm fuzzy" feelings that drew people to Bush are be the same "warm fuzzies" that will draw them to Thompson.

"Sigh... he's so dreamy and he's here to keep us safe form all the mean freedom haters!"

And then he'll get elected, the voters will feel a slapping sensation on their ass and say: "Hey, he's fuckin us!" :D

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JK7V26yi6RA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JK7V26yi6RA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>


Guess I'll have to take the puppet on the Left.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
DC, I've been watching as you responded, then edited your post, and responded again.

There was nothing in my post that supported Fred Thompson definitively. You're just looking for an arguement.

When you, Demon Cunt, speaks of naivety I have to smile.

We are allowed to edit our posts. That feature is even provided by the software running this board. I usually do to fix a typo or add a picture. This is your avoidance tactic, make it about my edits instead of Thompson.

You post a multi-paragraph response considering Thompson's viability as a candidate. I expect you to take responsibility for it.

Feel free to be specific about the "naivety" that you find in my posts.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
And I'll wholeheartedly agree with you on that point.

But I personally wouldn't even consider Thompson a "hold my nose, last resort" candidate.

Never under any circumstances would I consider him worthy of POTUS.

Not even close.


He could stump on a "legalize drugs, free beer, and ONLY a true CVH reunion allowed" platform and I wouldn't vote for him

He reeks of everything that is fucking wrong with the system today, and is barely a rung above Cheney in the creep-factor.

No substance whatsoever.

[Ellyllions]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
This is your avoidance tactic, make it about my edits instead of Thompson.

eeer. Wrong! Consolation prize is a toaster.
That was me letting you know that I knew you were working something up for me, without even reading what I posted.

You post a multi-paragraph response considering Thompson's viability as a candidate. I expect you to take responsibility for it.

Responsiblity taken. BUT, if you'd actually read the post you wouldn't have been so quick to want a slingfest. I'm beginning to think that you and I are on the same "cycle" my friend. Care to have some of my Midol? (*hint, that means that I'm just as bitchy as you are today dear.)

Feel free to be specific about the "naivety" that you find in my posts.

Nah, your naivety has already been noted by the sheer fact that you're looking for an argument that isn't there. Did you notice that I even used the word "backpedaling" in my post about Thompson? Nope, you sure didn't. All you saw was a republican login name and it's "game on". That's closed-minded naivety my friend. Sorry you didn't recognize it.

And, Lounge, I respect what you're saying but for me to make an my own informed decision, I want to hear all sides without regard to party affiliation or past judgements. And that's just me.

[DEMON CUNT]

Another post about me in a thread about Thompson. You accuse me of menstruating, you accuse me of not reading your posts. All you can do is attack me.

Again, your avoidance in action.

Your bold "backpedaling" statement was pure speculation.

(Full disclosure: edited due to the misspelling of "menstruating.")

[LoungeMachine]

Will you two just fuck already and get it over with...

The sexual tension between you is clouding your judgements...

We'll post it on youtube.

[DEMON CUNT]

Ha! I actually enjoy hearing from Elly. We do not agree but her perspective interests me.

I just wish that she would not become so frustrated by my challenges.

I have made serious efforts to avoid the name calling and raise the level of my posts because of Elly. I want her here sharing her thoughts. I want her to feel comfortable posting here.

We may often disagree, but I find her to be thoughtful and articulate.

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by FORD
I made the mistake of watching this goddamn buffoon on the Leno show the other night. This dumb son of a bitch has learned NOTHING since 2002. He's still talking as if all the BCE/PNAC excuses for invading Iraq were valid, even though they have all been proven false. And of course he spouts the Likudist line on Iran.

Thank God that nobody as fucking ugly as Thompson has a chance of being elected in a media driven presidential campaign.

I saw his appearance replayed on Youtube. What a boring, uninspired bag of wind this guy is...

Yeah, I love how he basically uses the language of the authoricon and fascism to demonize anyone who disagrees with his stilted views...

I wonder how it feels to support pro-Iranian Shi'ite "terrorists" actively working against our interests, in the "Iraqi" gov't? Tell us Fred!

[Ellyllions]

ya'll suck.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
ya'll suck.

All y'all?



You know we love you, Ell

[BITEYOASS]

I think the neo-con fundie wing of the GOP is becoming dead and bloated at this point. And unlike that STP song, they sure as hell ain't smelling like a rose.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
ya'll suck.

Is that an order?

[Warham]

I bet all you guys are lining up to vote for Hillary, eh?

You think she'll pull out us of Iraq if she wins? Be honest now, and put away those liberal feelings. I know you can do it.

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
But I personally wouldn't even consider Thompson a "hold my nose, last resort" candidate.

Never under any circumstances would I consider him worthy of POTUS.

Not even close.


He could stump on a "legalize drugs, free beer, and ONLY a true CVH reunion allowed" platform and I wouldn't vote for him

He reeks of everything that is fucking wrong with the system today, and is barely a rung above Cheney in the creep-factor.

No substance whatsoever.

I say the same thing about Hillary.

I guess our votes will offset each other next year.

You know what, Lounge. I don't believe you would EVER vote for a Republican candidate, no matter the platform, even if it were Ron Paul.

So all of this talk from you about how this Thompson blows or Giuliani sucks falls flat.

You'll pull the lever for whatever DNC candidate is nominated, even if it were Mike Gravel.