JFK Conspiracy Docudrama on the History Channel Now

**Terry** · 02-10-2008, 10:38 PM

Think it's just as likely Oswald killed JFK in more or less the fashion Earl Warren and Co said it happened than it was the product of some kind of conspiracy.

If I had to go with a broader conspiracy, the one that seems to have the most substance and circumstantial evidence to support it would be some combination of events and players regarding the CIA, Cuba and the Mob.

But Ruby was just a crackpot who acted on his own, regardless.

Oswald was flirting with people involved with the whole Cuban question. LHO was a very peculiar man and was involved in some odd things around the time of the assassination...

Broad-based and vague theories like those posed by Oliver Stone are, to me, dubious at best.

The further away we get from the JFK murder in years, though, the less resonance it has for me; not too many years down the line, it's gonna have as much meaning as the Lincoln killing.

**Grant** · 02-10-2008, 11:30 PM

Well, there's not much that can be said on it since this documentary needs to be viewed in order to be appropriately commented on. Wasn't this one only made a few years ago?

**LoungeMachine** · 02-10-2008, 11:42 PM

No way in hell Oswald acted alone....

if he was even involved at all......

**thome** · 02-11-2008, 12:27 AM

Your trolling is fucking getting old, idiot...

Keep it up, and you're going to be banned from this forum...

I'm starting a Thome gibberish thread here:

http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=52498

**Little Texan** · 02-11-2008, 12:51 AM

Originally posted by thome
http://www.jeannecarmen.com/

A old friend of ours died a month or so ago if you are into Burlesque babes like I am.

Sorry, i'm twisted like that .

Too bad we can't hear more from the bed partners.

Too bad no-one mentions these women who bring us the show night after night and they are so much more interesting than threads about Tittinie and what other skank is on the news.

The Bitches of today are horrible to look at and even more unintersting than the news dikks who report on them.

And this has what to do with the JFK Conspiracy?

Originally posted by thome
I think we all know who killed Kennedy ..?

A better question would be what killed off all your brain cells? That's assuming you even had a brain to begin with, of course.

**thome** · 02-11-2008, 01:21 AM

You are correct, I should have know all along it was the what that leans .

Incredible the simplicity of it all.....

One singular lineal thought.

OUTSTANDING!

**Nickdfresh** · 02-11-2008, 06:29 AM

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
No way in hell Oswald acted alone....

if he was even involved at all......

Um, dude, I think the fact he ambushed and shot a cop --finishing him off execution style-- tells me he at least had something to do with it...

**knuckleboner** · 02-11-2008, 12:06 PM

yeah, ballistically, it's been established that it's possible that a person from oswald's distance, with oswald's rifle could've gotten off the requisite shots in the requisite amount of time.

now, in reality, did oswald actually do that? maybe. maybe not. but it's definitely possible. and absent any real evidence to the contrary, i'm mildly in the lone shooter theory camp.

**FORD** · 02-11-2008, 12:57 PM

For one thing, Jack Ruby (real name Rubenstein) was anything BUT a random nut. He was a long time BCE flunkie who also had ties to the Giancana mob in Chicago.

Proof of his BCE ties.....

**FORD** · 02-11-2008, 01:06 PM

As for Oswald, the FBI and CIA admit that he did work for them at some point, but of course won't specify. But we all know that old J. Edna Hoover was no friend of the Kennedys.......

**Bob Brubake** · 02-12-2008, 02:01 PM

I liked how they picked apart Oliver Stone's movie. JFK was a good movie, but it was full of holes. Specifically how Stone shortened the time frame Oswald had to shoot 3 shots(some old fart got off the 3 shots with a second to spare on the show), and Stone lied about Oswald being a bad marksman. Oswald was a fine marksman trained in the Marines.

Were others in on it, maybe, but we'll never know for sure.

Good show, gotta love the History Channel.

**hideyoursheep** · 02-13-2008, 05:52 AM

The autopsy photos were a cover-up.
Of what, I don't know, other than the wound was actually nothing like the one pictured.

Oswald was the gunman. Three shots from within 13 seconds. It's been proven it can be done in 9. And with a scope, even a mediocre
marksman can get those on target from that distance.

The "Magic Bullet"? Look at the trajectory, and it's very possible.

My therory of why the first shot missed his head was that the range was actually too close for the scope to be accurate.

**scamper** · 02-13-2008, 10:37 AM

Originally posted by FORD
For one thing, Jack Ruby (real name Rubenstein) was anything BUT a random nut. He was a long time BCE flunkie who also had ties to the Giancana mob in Chicago.

Proof of his BCE ties.....

How do you get to sleep at night?

**knuckleboner** · 02-13-2008, 11:15 AM

Originally posted by hideyoursheep
The autopsy photos were a cover-up.
Of what, I don't know, other than the wound was actually nothing like the one pictured.

Oswald was the gunman. Three shots from within 13 seconds. It's been proven it can be done in 9. And with a scope, even a mediocre
marksman can get those on target from that distance.

The "Magic Bullet"? Look at the trajectory, and it's very possible.

My therory of why the first shot missed his head was that the range was actually too close for the scope to be accurate.

i kinda believe that it's highly possible that any coverup is the government actually covering any (honest, but perhaps negligent) mistakes made in the pre-event security and in their initial inability to get oswald.

JFK Conspiracy Docudrama on the History Channel Now

JFK Conspiracy Docudrama on the History Channel Now

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment