The Video Isreal Does Not Want You To See.

[DEMON CUNT]

I'm glad you asked. I don't take the time that I used to writing what I think because after making an effort to do so it is usually met in here by "Fucking Busheep!" and "Republipuke Cocksmoker!" etc. So I learned that it just isn't worth it (time-wise) to try and make a thoughtful post about what I thought.

So if I find something interesting I will post it in here and then get accused of doing a Joe Biden if I forget to cite it. So, I still get brainless knee-jerk Commie replies but at least I didn't waste my time writing it myself.

Calm down, Schlutz.

I read the contents of your plagiarized response (even did some googling of my own) and accepted the fact that I fell for some propaganda. You totally busted me with your stolen content. Can you take no comfort in that?

[Sgt Schultz]

Are you still nipping at my heels about this, little doggie?

So, how does my response in entry #4 play into this scenario? Could the statement "Yep, looks like I fell for some propaganda. My bad." be considered "addressing the substance of the argument"?

Did "Sgt" Schlutz, known plagiarist, spend a few hours sucking on the Dikipedia for nothing?

Re-read pt. 2 of you post. If you can't understand it then I can't help you.

I figgered you could find Wiki since you probably don't own or read books.

[DEMON CUNT]

Re-read pt. 2 of you post. If you can't understand it then I can't help you.

I figgered you could find Wiki since you probably don't own or read books.

Not only can I find the Wiki, I found the very blog from which you plagiarized your first response. I even provided the link (that you had previously "forgot") in the previously mentioned entry #4. See if you can find it.

Books? What is books? Please explain, great plagiarizer! Me not know what books is! What is books?!?

[Sgt Schultz]

Not only can I find the Wiki, I found the very blog from which you plagiarized your first response. I even provided the link (that you had previously "forgot") in the previously mentioned entry #4. See if you can find it.

Books? What is books? Please explain, great plagiarizer! Me not know what books is! What is books?!?

Wrongo. The link I posted is where it came from.

OK me got last word in, I win.

[sadaist]

An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the source making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.

And in case any simpleton was wondering - the above is FROM WIKIPEDIA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

LOL. Certain posters have been called out for this before. When they cannot respond to the information contained within a post, they direct their frustrations at the poster.

[LoungeMachine]

LOL. Certain posters have been called out for this before. When they cannot respond to the information contained within a post, they direct their frustrations at the poster.

Just like when "certain posters" can no longer defend or spin their party's shenanigans, they direct their frustrations out on other posters...

Works both ways, pookie.

[DEMON CUNT]

Wrongo. The link I posted is where it came from.

OK me got last word in, I win.

So you plagiarized from previously plagiarized material? Damn, you're good!

[DEMON CUNT]

LOL. Certain posters have been called out for this before. When they cannot respond to the information contained within a post, they direct their frustrations at the poster.

Gosh! Is that what that big ol' complicated entry in the Wiki means? Thanks for watering it down for us, Sadass.