Tweet
ELVIS and EXXON sitting in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G
K-I-S-S-I-N-G
-
-
No dude...
All of these sources can't be debunked...
Show me one source that proves CO2 as a pollutant...
Comment
-
Show you one source that CO2 causes climate change?
Would you like to try moving to another planet that only had a CO2 atmosphere?Comment
-
No, I need oxygen and the plants I eat need CO2...Comment
-
Who would have a better grasp of science than a op-ed fraud operating out of a stated right wing think tank?
Hudson Institute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaComment
-
The thing is that even Exxon-Mobil is too embarrassed by this asshattery and they have largely stopped funding moronic sophistry and denying the inevitable...
But it was as late as ten years ago they were funding fraudulent, pseudo-scientific research into exploring how oil comes from rocks and not dead dinosaurs (then we'd NEVER run out! Get it?)Comment
-
We're not running out...Comment
-
"we're not running out"
not today, but someday, as it gets too expensive to drill and process. Also read Hubbert's Peak Oil Theory. If there is any saving grace in this "Climate Change" hysteria, I believe it will be the innovation for new technology that could replace petroleum in may aspects of our daily life. "Could" is a big word, because it's going to cost $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ to change infrastructure, and we, or our children, will have to pay that $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$.Comment
-
Hot Air » Blog Archive » About that Arctic ice disappearance …
National Geographic in summer 2008:
Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer, report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field.
“We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history],” David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker. …
But this summer’s forecast—and unusual early melting events all around the Arctic—serve as a dire warning of how quickly the polar regions are being affected by climate change.
National Geographic this week:
This year’s cooler-than-expected summer means the Arctic probably won’t experience ice-free summers until 2030 or 2040, scientists say.
Some models had previously predicted that the Arctic could be ice free in summer by as soon as 2013, due to rising temperatures from global warming.
Scientifically, what does this tell us about the climate-change models used to make this hysterical claim?
They’re completely wrong and should be jettisoned — or,
They speak to a larger truth and should be used and heretics skeptics shunned
Which option would a real scientist choose, and which one would a political hack with interests in glomming onto big government grants choose?Comment
-
LMAO!
Comment
-
climate models are too simple to replicate a complex universe. we can hardly explain how and why it all works environmentally, cosmically, or atmospherically. we will never be smart enough to control, fix or alter Mother Nature. it will rain when earth needs water. ice caps will stop melting when the atmosphere and the planet decide there is enough water in the oceans and it is time to allow them to recede. last weekend, my weatherman's model told me it will be overcast today, and he's 100% off base.Comment
-
<object width="873" height="525"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vFGU6qvkmTI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x402061&color2=0x94 61ca&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vFGU6qvkmTI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x402061&color2=0x94 61ca&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="873" height="525"></embed></object>Comment
Comment