For Those of You on Your Way to Church This Morning...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Big Train
    Full Member Status

    • Apr 2004
    • 4013

    #61
    Hot Air » Blog Archive » Socialist millionaire: People who default on their mortgages are like rape victims or something

    Socialist millionaire: People who default on their mortgages are like rape victims or
    Something

    Only now, after watching this, do I grasp the full horror of what Polanski did to that little girl. Why, he treated her like some common loan applicant, didn’t he?

    Seriously, what is it with media liberals minimizing rape lately? First the Polanski spirit squad rallies to defend a child molester, replete with Obama cheerleader Tom Shales hinting that 13-year-olds should be fair game in Hollywood. Now here comes this guy treating subprime borrowers who took out mortgages they couldn’t afford like they’re Jodie Foster being slammed down on the pinball machine in “The Accused.” My memory of commercial law is hazy but signing your name to a contract does usually imply consent, no? Or does he mean to suggest that the poor, as eternal victims of the great bourgeois conspiracy, can never meaningfully consent? That would fit better with the socialist view of the lower class as essentially children, who can’t fairly be held to the same standard of personal responsibility as middle-class “adults.”

    And yet, I can’t stay mad at him. For one thing, his willingness to resort to nutty rhetoric like this ensures that he’ll remain a fringe figure. And for another, check out the exchange he had with Hannity about Jesus and Al Qaeda. Sean dodges the question with a joke but that doesn’t mean it’s not a good question.

    Click here for the clip.
    Michael Moore: Foreclosed Homeowners Like Rape Victims

    Comment

    • Nickdfresh
      SUPER MODERATOR

      • Oct 2004
      • 49567

      #62
      Originally posted by binnie
      But wouldn't you agree that since the 1980s the West has essentially been a society that loves, and indeed worships, wealth?

      ...
      Since the 1980s? I think you mean 1680s, bro. What do you think Imperialism was all about? Christianizing spear chuckers?

      Comment

      • binnie
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • May 2006
        • 19145

        #63
        Originally posted by Nickdfresh
        Since the 1980s? I think you mean 1680s, bro. What do you think Imperialism was all about? Christianizing spear chuckers?
        Haha!

        What a depressing thought.......

        It certainly was about wealth, no question. However, for the majoirty of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the bulk of the population of Europe and America was still dirt poor - earning a crust was their goal, not the endless consumerism that we know and love(?). Something began to change in the 1950s but really kicked in the 80s I think.....
        The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

        Comment

        • Seshmeister
          ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

          • Oct 2003
          • 35755

          #64
          Originally posted by Nickdfresh
          Since the 1980s? I think you mean 1680s, bro. What do you think Imperialism was all about? Christianizing spear chuckers?
          More like the 1080s

          The Christian monastries were richer than the countries they were in.

          They had a cool scam going that for each person you were responsible for killing you had to pray for penance for say 40 days or go to hell. This left Christian kings after battles having to pray for 10s of thousands of days!

          The only answer for them to avoid eternal damnation was to sub contract all this praying to 1000s of monks for a price. In turn the monasteries made bags of gold.

          Ludicrous and silly but isn't that always the way with the invisible friend stuff...

          Comment

          • Coyote
            ROTH ARMY SUPREME
            • Jan 2004
            • 8185

            #65
            Originally posted by ELVIS
            Correct. The LOVE of money is the root of all evil...

            It leads to greed, or avarice...
            Hey, I've heard that song before...
            <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zk2zoEZuEPg&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zk2zoEZuEPg&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
            Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

            Originally posted by Seshmeister
            It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

            Comment

            • Coyote
              ROTH ARMY SUPREME
              • Jan 2004
              • 8185

              #66
              Originally posted by binnie
              Haha!

              What a depressing thought.......

              It certainly was about wealth, no question. However, for the majoirty of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the bulk of the population of Europe and America was still dirt poor - earning a crust was their goal, not the endless consumerism that we know and love(?). Something began to change in the 1950s but really kicked in the 80s I think.....
              Tax evasion?
              Why settle for something you have, if it's not as good as something you're out to get?

              Originally posted by Seshmeister
              It's like putting up a YouTube of Bach and playing Chopstix on your Bontempi...

              Comment

              • ZahZoo
                ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                • Jan 2004
                • 9173

                #67
                Originally posted by binnie
                Haha!

                What a depressing thought.......

                It certainly was about wealth, no question. However, for the majoirty of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries the bulk of the population of Europe and America was still dirt poor - earning a crust was their goal, not the endless consumerism that we know and love(?). Something began to change in the 1950s but really kicked in the 80s I think.....
                That "something" that changed in the 1950's was a combination of coming out of the Great Depression and the end of World War II. One of the more peaceful times on Earth...

                What followed was the largest increase in population/birth rates ever recorded in North America, Europe and Austrailia.

                Think about it... all that fuckin and baby making drove the global economies. More people and you get more economy... food, goods, services, housing, transportation, technology, etc...

                In the 60's the introduction of birth control and the end of the mass of fertility from that demographic of breeders ran out. You can almost chart economic downturns in relation to decreased birth rates and vice-versa.

                Look at the two largest growing economies today... China & India what's going there that ain't happening elsewhere... Increased birth rate and population growth.

                You want to help our economy today... get busy and make some babies!!
                "If you want to be a monk... you gotta cook a lot of rice...”

                Comment

                • ELVIS
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 44120

                  #68
                  The government doesn't want us making babies...

                  Comment

                  • Nickdfresh
                    SUPER MODERATOR

                    • Oct 2004
                    • 49567

                    #69
                    Originally posted by ELVIS
                    The government doesn't want us making babies...
                    No. They don't want YOU making babies!!

                    Comment

                    • Seshmeister
                      ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                      • Oct 2003
                      • 35755

                      #70
                      Separated at birth...

                      Comment

                      Working...