Obama Chooses New Focus in Afghanistan?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • standin
    Veteran
    • Apr 2009
    • 2274
    #16
    <object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kjVgs0gC6v4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x99 9999&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kjVgs0gC6v4&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x99 9999&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object>
    To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
    MICHAEL G. MULLEN

      Comment

      • Guitar Shark
        ROTH ARMY SUPREME
        • Jan 2004
        • 7579
        #17
        Originally posted by knuckleboner
        eh...at the time, the taliban harbored al qaeda, especially as the de facto government of afghanistan. when we went after al qaeda initially, the taliban were legitimate targets.

        now; however, the taliban, at worst, are the guys trying to take back power in afghanistan. that should be the focus and responsibility of the legit afghani government.
        Good to see you kb...
        ROTH ARMY MILITIA


        Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
        Sharky sometimes needs things spelled out for him in explicit, specific detail. I used to think it was a lawyer thing, but over time it became more and more evident that he's merely someone's idiot twin.

          Comment

          Previous 1 2 template Next
          Working...