The Conservative Case FOR Gar Marriage

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FORD
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    • Jan 2004
    • 59643

    #76
    **Breaking News** - Judge Walker has denied the homophobes request for a "stay" on the Prop H8 decision, which means marriage equality once again officially exists in Collieforneea.

    So go find a new man, GAyR, and get over that broken heart you got from Jizzy.
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

    Comment

    • GAR
      Banned
      • Jan 2004
      • 10881

      #77
      How can a faggot marriage be equal to a real one?

      Going back 5000 years such a statement has no precedent.

      The only reason a homo wants to be recognized as such in public is for public benefits of any kind they can get. And until they brought the AIDS epidemic into the world, all they could go on about was being their own society = not a part of normal society.

      Comment

      • GAR
        Banned
        • Jan 2004
        • 10881

        #78
        FORD runs the typical Hillaryspeak game of tearing down the opposite viewpoint when backed into a corner.

        I expect no less from him.

        Comment

        • jhale667
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Aug 2004
          • 20929

          #79
          Originally posted by GAR
          FORD runs the typical Hillaryspeak game of tearing down the opposite viewpoint when backed into a corner.

          I expect no less from him.
          Just like we expect no less than hate-filled, pea-brained DOUCHEBAGGERY from you. You should be happy about this...oh, wait - that's right, Jizzystool won't take you back... Hence the bitterness.
          Originally posted by conmee
          If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

          That is all.

          Icon.
          Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
          I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


          Originally posted by Isaac R.
          Then it's really true??

          The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

          OMFG...who in their right mind...???
          Originally posted by eddie78
          I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

          Comment

          • GAR
            Banned
            • Jan 2004
            • 10881

            #80
            So your point is what Jay, that society should not call the mental illness known as homosexuality a neurosis, but reward them with public assistence and benefits once their knobpartner croaks from AIDS?

            Comment

            • GAR
              Banned
              • Jan 2004
              • 10881

              #81
              Hmm.. Jay, male: single, unmarried
              FORD, also male, unmarried..

              HEY I got an idea! Jay - meet FORD!

              Ford, I'd like to introduce my very great pal Jay.. I'll just run along here now, you girls talk amongst yourselves...

              Comment

              • jhale667
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Aug 2004
                • 20929

                #82
                The only one with a mental illness is YOU, scumbag. Eat a gun. By that, I do not mean perform oral on some Jizzy substitute, either.
                Originally posted by conmee
                If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

                That is all.

                Icon.
                Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
                I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


                Originally posted by Isaac R.
                Then it's really true??

                The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

                OMFG...who in their right mind...???
                Originally posted by eddie78
                I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

                Comment

                • GAR
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 10881

                  #83
                  You share similar views, why are you upset?

                  You'll get used to him. And he'll get used to you too.

                  Comment

                  • jhale667
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 20929

                    #84
                    So you just admitted you fantasize about us both....ewww.

                    Originally posted by GAR
                    Hmm.. Jay, male: single, unmarried
                    FORD, also male, unmarried..
                    Betting in both our cases it's by design...not because, like you, NO ONE will have us...

                    Your sorry ass can't get any action at a MORGUE. Or a women's prison.


                    However, you WERE somebody's bitch when you were in JAIL though, weren't you, CONVICT?
                    Originally posted by conmee
                    If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

                    That is all.

                    Icon.
                    Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
                    I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


                    Originally posted by Isaac R.
                    Then it's really true??

                    The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

                    OMFG...who in their right mind...???
                    Originally posted by eddie78
                    I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

                    Comment

                    • GAR
                      Banned
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 10881

                      #85
                      I did vomit and piss all over the MCJ bus going to court once.. fortunately, it wasn't a four-man chain because that one doesn't give you one hand free to do so!

                      Comment

                      • Nickdfresh
                        SUPER MODERATOR

                        • Oct 2004
                        • 49567

                        #86
                        Originally posted by BigBadBrian
                        Just look at how you and your butt-buddy DumbAsARock69 turned out, that's why.

                        Also NicktheDick always following DoucheMmachine around and giving him a reacharound.

                        Those are two prime examples right there!
                        I'm amazed you can post this well with one hand while jerking-off to your creepy fantasies...

                        But if gays can get married (and I think they should be able too), heterosexual men can be single. So don't fret too much Brianne if your son doesn't have a girlfriend...

                        Comment

                        • Nickdfresh
                          SUPER MODERATOR

                          • Oct 2004
                          • 49567

                          #87
                          Originally posted by GAR
                          How can a faggot marriage be equal to a real one?

                          Going back 5000 years such a statement has no precedent.
                          I think a better question is: why am I bothering with these trolling fuckbag posts of GAyR's repressed-faggotry?

                          Most things in modern society "have no precedent" to what happened in the Iron Age, Google-fuckwit! Marriage had never been about love nor was monogamy expected (of males at least) and bisexuality was almost a universal norm depending on the society...

                          The only reason a homo wants to be recognized as such in public is for public benefits of any kind they can get.
                          Like what "benefits?" The rights to set up their estate as they wish? To have their long term companions recognized officially with a status that affords them social, economic, and legal protections? Why would those benefits be "special" when compared to heterosexual relationships? I think you're actually making the case FOR gay marriage...

                          And until they brought the AIDS epidemic into the world, all they could go on about was being their own society = not a part of normal society.
                          "They" brought the AIDS epidemic into the world? What world? It was their own community? And actually the biggest spreader of AIDS in the world are heterosexual Africans that may have other STDs (like your mother)...

                          Comment

                          • bueno bob
                            DIAMOND STATUS
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 22951

                            #88
                            Originally posted by GAR
                            Why give extra-civil rights to some, but not to all>? Don't the pedophiles have a claim of damage here, by not recognizing their Constitutionally guaranteed right to happiness by stalking playgrounds? Don't the serial killers have a right to the happiness they obtain from a good night bathing themselves in blood?

                            Don't the animal friendly have a right to marry say, a horse, a goat, a SheepPen Person or any other living creature?

                            Originally you make a home for children. The only children the Gays get to birth is a turd-gurglette.. which needs only a toilet not a crib.
                            You're a dumbshit. You might as well argue that masturbation is a gateway to homosexuality too because you touch your own genetalia and that's gay.

                            If you have a sensible argument to make, present it. Don't be an idiot.
                            Twistin' by the pool.

                            Comment

                            • knuckleboner
                              Crazy Ass Mofo
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 2927

                              #89
                              Originally posted by GAR
                              Why give extra-civil rights to some, but not to all>?
                              it’s not. it’s equalizing the rights.

                              Don't the pedophiles have a claim of damage here, by not recognizing their Constitutionally guaranteed right to happiness by stalking playgrounds?
                              no. because their attacks harm the rights of the child. allowing 2 gay adult to marry is simply saying that, currently, in the eyes of the government, a marriage is simply a set of legal agreements committed to by 2 consenting adults. religions might treat it differently, but as far as governments are concerned, the right isn’t changed at all if the 2 consenting adults are same sex or not.


                              Don't the serial killers have a right to the happiness they obtain from a good night bathing themselves in blood?
                              nope. once again, you’re confusing things. just because YOU think one action (homosexuality) is immoral, doesn’t mean that it’s the same as every other officially illegal act. again, to spell this out for you: serial killer: clearly the victim’s rights are attacked. consenting gays: nobody’s rights are harmed.


                              Don't the animal friendly have a right to marry say, a horse, a goat, a SheepPen Person or any other living creature?
                              man, you really don’t get these things. ok. once again: legally, marriage is between 2 consenting adults. a horse, goat, or hagar fan are not consenting adults. get it? completely different.

                              Originally you make a home for children. The only children the Gays get to birth is a turd-gurglette.. which needs only a toilet not a crib.
                              dude, quick tip: never close with your weakest argument.

                              Comment

                              • bueno bob
                                DIAMOND STATUS
                                • Jul 2004
                                • 22951

                                #90
                                Originally posted by knuckleboner
                                it’s not. it’s equalizing the rights.



                                no. because their attacks harm the rights of the child. allowing 2 gay adult to marry is simply saying that, currently, in the eyes of the government, a marriage is simply a set of legal agreements committed to by 2 consenting adults. religions might treat it differently, but as far as governments are concerned, the right isn’t changed at all if the 2 consenting adults are same sex or not.



                                nope. once again, you’re confusing things. just because YOU think one action (homosexuality) is immoral, doesn’t mean that it’s the same as every other officially illegal act. again, to spell this out for you: serial killer: clearly the victim’s rights are attacked. consenting gays: nobody’s rights are harmed.



                                man, you really don’t get these things. ok. once again: legally, marriage is between 2 consenting adults. a horse, goat, or hagar fan are not consenting adults. get it? completely different.



                                dude, quick tip: never close with your weakest argument.
                                A well thought out, clear, coherent, rational and intelligent response. Unfortunately, this dickwad isn't interested in any of the above - he's only worried about how to stop the oncoming rush of gay man making him marriage proposals.

                                He's such a catch, I can certainly see why....
                                Twistin' by the pool.

                                Comment

                                Working...