what's your point? the fact is that the recession, which began in 2007, and lasted throughout all of 2008 was still causing job losses the second obama took office. (significant job losses - 741,000 in january 2009).
so yes, if we saved 2 jobs but lost 4, it sucks for 2 people. but isn't it better than losing all 4?
or is the assumption that if we had continued to do nothing, that somehow, miraculously, the worst recession since the great depression would've instantaneously fixed itself, and all of the damage it caused in the preceeding 14 months?
so yes, if we saved 2 jobs but lost 4, it sucks for 2 people. but isn't it better than losing all 4?
or is the assumption that if we had continued to do nothing, that somehow, miraculously, the worst recession since the great depression would've instantaneously fixed itself, and all of the damage it caused in the preceeding 14 months?
Comment