bump.
Mainly because I'm a sucker for Nuclear Holocaust shit.
Saw a scenario on the show "Deadliest Warrior" where they speculated how a battle between N. Korean soldiers and American soldiers would go. Pretty much the scenario is that North Korea wants to take over the entire peninsula of Korea and reunify.
and it brought up an interesting thought to my mind, and a question to my our Non-American Roth Army members
If, IF, the US was attacked first via a nuclear weapon by Kim Jong Ill or his crazy ass son (this is assuming some how they've got something to actually say...hit like Honolulu). How supportive would the world be if the US retaliated in some way shape or form?
I ask this because I had noticed quite a bit of backlash from those in Europe over the War in Iraq 2003 on.
In the scenario I'm imagining, the action is simply done by N. Korea out of aggression and not truly provoked by anything said or done by the USA. Kind of similar to the new "Red Dawn"/HomeFront movie plot.
Mainly because I'm a sucker for Nuclear Holocaust shit.
Saw a scenario on the show "Deadliest Warrior" where they speculated how a battle between N. Korean soldiers and American soldiers would go. Pretty much the scenario is that North Korea wants to take over the entire peninsula of Korea and reunify.
and it brought up an interesting thought to my mind, and a question to my our Non-American Roth Army members
If, IF, the US was attacked first via a nuclear weapon by Kim Jong Ill or his crazy ass son (this is assuming some how they've got something to actually say...hit like Honolulu). How supportive would the world be if the US retaliated in some way shape or form?
I ask this because I had noticed quite a bit of backlash from those in Europe over the War in Iraq 2003 on.
In the scenario I'm imagining, the action is simply done by N. Korea out of aggression and not truly provoked by anything said or done by the USA. Kind of similar to the new "Red Dawn"/HomeFront movie plot.
Comment