If this is your first visit to the Roth Army, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
lol... there is a few people that should have that sign next to them 24/7 :D
"I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. - Some come from ahead and some come from behind. - But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see. - Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!" ~ Dr. Seuss
Everyone needs to put down all the signs & just start worrying about themselves instead of what everyone else is doing. Don't like fags? Don't be one. Quite simple actually.
“Great losses often bring only a numb shock. To truly plunge a victim into misery, you must overwhelm him with many small sufferings.”
Everyone needs to put down all the signs & just start worrying about themselves instead of what everyone else is doing. Don't like fags? Don't be one. Quite simple actually.
Outstandingly simple, isn't it????
Besides, anybody that spends their life running around the country with signs like that spend FAR more time obsessing over those actions that even the people that perform them.... Not a good way of proving you "hate" the idea......
TOPEKA —Members of a Kansas church sued for protesting outside a Marine's funeral are gearing up to present their case to the U.S. Supreme Court in October.
The high court is scheduled to hear arguments Oct. 6 in the case of Westboro Baptist Church, which claims its protests outside a 2006 funeral of a Marine killed in Iraq were free speech protected by the First Amendment.
The Topeka-based church's members picket funerals of service members, contending the deaths are God's punishment for America's tolerance of homosexuality.
Albert Snyder of York, Pa., sued Westboro, accusing it of inflicting emotional distress and invading his privacy when pickets protested outside the funeral of his son, Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder, in Westminster, Md.
The court will consider whether Westboro's message is protected by the First Amendment or limited by privacy and religious rights of mourners.
In 2007, a jury found against Westboro and awarded Snyder nearly $11 million as compensation for emotional distress and invasion of privacy. That award was later reduced and then overturned by a court of appeals.
The Supreme Court agreed in March to take the case.
Margie Phelps, daughter of Westboro founder Fred Phelps, will have 30 minutes to argue before the court that the protest is protected speech. Attorney Sean Summers will have 30 minutes to argue Snyder's side.
Church spokeswoman Shirley Phelps-Roper said about two dozen members of the church would drive from Topeka to Washington and would picket along the way. They will also be picketing outside the Supreme Court while the arguments are being presented, she told the Topeka Capital-Journal.
She said the church has picketed the Supreme Court twice before.
Fred Phelps is not making the trip to Washington, she said.
Idiots need to rename their church to Westboro Church Of Satan, but the actual Church of Satan might be offended, as they are more Christian that Phelps and his asslickers.
Not to mention Satan might be offended, but then it is ok for them to offend Satan, as I am sure he has a special pit reserved for them that is EXTRA hot.
Fact: Unless someone's trying to force YOU to marry a gay person? you need to STFU.
I issued the challenge again yesterday to a friend (in VA ranting against a decision made in a CA court on his FB page, echoed by equally intolerant friends of his) to explain to me (sans irrelevant religious diatribe) to explain to me why I (or any straight person is)'m supposed to be against gay marriage. He couldn't. Took issue with my telling him he HAD to "remove the irrelevant religious component in the debate" he replies "since you said that, you just excused yourself from the conversation!" to which I replied "How do you figure that, since the discussion is in regard to STATE recognition of same-sex marriage? There IS still that separation of church and state bit in place, RIGHT?" He had no response to that, and got so angry he not only removed my post from his page, but his entire thread about it...because he knows he got owned (in front of all our mutual FB friends, too).
I see no reason why I should give a flying shit if same-sex marriage is allowed. Hell, as a sociological experiment - let's see in 5 years if the divorce rate is similar to straight couples - now THAT will be interesting to see.
Originally posted by conmee If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.
That is all.
Icon.
Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667
Originally posted by Isaac R. Then it's really true??
The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???
OMFG...who in their right mind...???
Originally posted by eddie78 I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.
Christ, Don't give 'em THAT angle to work with....
The asshole zealots will be standing around with ass-fucker signs everywhere from hospitals to lamaze classes....
Nah, what I'm surprised hasn't already happened, is some douche on the anti side taking the "moral objection is not sufficient cause" quote for the decision and trying to twist it to imply "If that's the case, I should be able to MURDER people then...duh...."
Originally posted by conmee If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.
That is all.
Icon.
Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667
Originally posted by Isaac R. Then it's really true??
The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???
OMFG...who in their right mind...???
Originally posted by eddie78 I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.
I don't have a problem with fags as long as they stay away from me. I do have a problem with openly flamboyant homo's though.
If I was that narrow-minded I wouldn't have a job. Or at least not the current one.
Dude, they could care less about you OR your butt. More to the point, since YOU'RE the one fearful for your butt, perhaps you secretly want it to be in danger of buggery? Think about it...
Originally posted by conmee If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.
That is all.
Icon.
Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667
Originally posted by Isaac R. Then it's really true??
The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???
OMFG...who in their right mind...???
Originally posted by eddie78 I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.
If I was that narrow-minded I wouldn't have a job. Or at least not the current one.
Dude, they could care less about you OR your butt. More to the point, since YOU'RE the one fearful for your butt, perhaps you secretly want it to be in danger of buggery? Think about it...
I'm not fearful or secretly wanting anything near my butt. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Comment