Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate

[BigBadBrian]

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquer...2:SC00041:@@@R

They voted not to proceed on a vote......

No budget was defeated, Idiot....do your own research



No wonder FAUX KNEWS viewers are such sheep...

Status: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 0 - 99

There you go DoucheMachine...idiot!

[BigBadBrian]

here's a fun fact: presidental budgets are NEVER intended to be fully implemented. in fact, there is NEVER an opportunity to do so.

president's propose budgetary actions: specific appropriations (none of which are in a budget resolution - the kind of thing referenced in this article), and specific revenue measures (none of which are in a budget resolution.

in order to actually vote on the president's budget, you'd need an onimbus appropriations bill that includes tax policy changes.

even had this vote taken place (Yes, it actually did), and it DID take place in the house, it was NOT on any specific expenditures nor tax policies. it was simply top-line numbers. the only one of which matters at all being the ones solely for the upcoming fiscal year.

Good post, kb. The vote did take place, however. DoucheMachine cannot be believed and has no credibility.

[Satan]

So you put up a link from a Left-Wing Hack site....BRILLIANT!

How is a site founded by a "moderate" Republican, and now owned by AOL considered "left wing"??

[LoungeMachine]

Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate
.

Um, no it wasn't, dumbshit.



No OBAMA BUDGET was defeated

[Hardrock69]

Yet another demonstration of Standard Republico-Christian Foam-At-The-Mouth Idiocy by BigBadBrucie.....

He "thanked" post number 10.....which was the opposite of what he thought it meant.

Knuckleboner gave a good, brief description of the Congressional procedure for dealing with Budgetary legislation. He did NOT claim that Obama's "budget" got defeated.

in order to actually vote on the president's budget, you'd need an onimbus appropriations bill that includes tax policy changes.

even had this vote taken place, and it DID take place in the house, it was NOT on any specific expenditures nor tax policies. it was simply top-line numbers. the only one of which matters at all being the ones solely for the upcoming fiscal year.

The above explains how BigBadBrucie got it wrong, and Brucie was glad someone was explaining to him he was wrong in language he could not easily understand.
Usually he wants to argue when someone says he is wrong (which is about all the time ).