French Government Plans 75% Tax Rate on the Rich

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MUSICMANN
    Sniper
    • Apr 2004
    • 837

    #16
    Originally posted by jhale667
    Here's a question for the heartless zealot conservatard idiot... are you OK with Wrongney's plan to raise YOUR taxes to give yet another tax break to the wealthy?

    Romney hasn't even laid out his tax plan yet. You're basing this off of a Democratic backed/tax group that set models up and on conjecture came up with a hypothesis. Obama is going around using this as a straight up fact which it's not. If Obama gets his way, he will raise taxes on the rich and continue to keep moving the percentage up, until it runs the wealthy and business owners right out of the country. Once that happens, who do you think will have to carry the tax load, the middle class.

    Comment

    • Satan
      ROTH ARMY ELITE
      • Jan 2004
      • 6664

      #17
      Fact is that the so-called "job creators" aren't creating any jobs at all, and haven't created any actual living wage jobs in years.

      Or - like Mittens himself - any jobs they have created have been in India, China, or some other third world sweatshop Heavenhole where they can pay $6.66/per day.

      When tax rates on corporations and the rich were more reasonable, the rich put money back into their businesses to avoid paying taxes, but at least they were contributing to the economy because there were actual living wage jobs, and at least the folks working those jobs paid taxes.

      Now the rich are sitting on the money, dodging the taxes, and the people working for $6.66/hr at WalMart don't make enough money to pay taxes, which means NOBODY is actually paying for the fucking government to function correctly.

      And 30 years of results tells us that this ain't working.
      Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

      Originally posted by Sockfucker
      I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

      Comment

      • LoungeMachine
        DIAMOND STATUS
        • Jul 2004
        • 32576

        #18
        Originally posted by MUSICMANN
        Romney hasn't even laid out his tax plan yet. .
        Sure he has.

        It's the Ryan Plan

        Originally posted by Kristy
        Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
        Originally posted by cadaverdog
        I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

        Comment

        • LoungeMachine
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Jul 2004
          • 32576

          #19
          Originally posted by Satan
          Fact is that the so-called "job creators" aren't creating any jobs at all, and haven't created any actual living wage jobs in years.

          .
          The only true "job creators" is the middle class

          Originally posted by Kristy
          Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
          Originally posted by cadaverdog
          I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

          Comment

          • BITEYOASS
            ROTH ARMY ELITE
            • Jan 2004
            • 6530

            #20
            Last time I checked, these tax cuts for the wealthy weren't helping to create jobs.

            Comment

            • Blaze
              Full Member Status

              • Jan 2009
              • 4371

              #21
              Originally posted by MUSICMANN
              Romney hasn't even laid out his tax plan yet. You're basing this off of a Democratic backed/tax group that set models up and on conjecture came up with a hypothesis. Obama is going around using this as a straight up fact which it's not. If Obama gets his way, he will raise taxes on the rich and continue to keep moving the percentage up, until it runs the wealthy and business owners right out of the country. Once that happens, who do you think will have to carry the tax load, the middle class.
              "I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. - Some come from ahead and some come from behind. - But I've bought a big bat. I'm all ready you see. - Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!" ~ Dr. Seuss
              sigpic

              Comment

              • Seshmeister
                ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                • Oct 2003
                • 35215

                #22
                Originally posted by WACF
                I guess what I am looking at for brackets is that £43000 is a tad under $67000 CDN....40% is high.

                I totaly understand higher incomes can take a higher tax threshold but....a jump like that attacks people that may have made a choice of being a police officer, fire fighter, nurse, miners ect...versus working at the lumber yard 9-5.

                I just don't agree with it being so high.

                These are Canada's Federal rates for 2012

                •15% on the first $42,707 of taxable income, +
                •22% on the next $42,707 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income over $42,707 up to $85,414), +
                •26% on the next $46,992 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income over $85,414 up to $132,406), +
                •29% of taxable income over $132,406.

                Much more palatable for my tastes...
                Ahhh but you are not comparing like with like there.

                The UK does not have local income tax which Canada has at what 10% on top of all those? In the UK 2/3rds of local government spending comes from the central(federal) government the other 3rd from a a local tax based on the price of your house which is usually around $3k a year.

                Once you add it all up there isn't a huge difference between the UK, Canada and the US who are all quite low by Western standards.



                When I found this out I was quite surprised at how much Americans get ripped off because they don't get universal healthcare for their money, I guess because so much gets pissed away on defence.
                Last edited by Seshmeister; 08-08-2012, 04:46 PM.

                Comment

                • MUSICMANN
                  Sniper
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 837

                  #23



                  If people would actually read and not assume, they would come to a very different conclusion on Romney's tax plan.

                  The presidential candidates are dropping like flies now, so let’s see of the survivors who has the most pro-growth tax plan. All the Republican candidates have crafted plans that would slash tax rates for everyone and most would vastly simplify...

                  Comment

                  • bueno bob
                    DIAMOND STATUS
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 22951

                    #24
                    I make a fair amount of money, basically towards the upper end of the middle class spectrum - enough to raise a family of 5 people and 2 dogs on and have cash in the bank afterwards. Over the last ten years, I've had a few issues about the "dwindling economy"...I think I've been lucky...I've steadily raised my stature and upgraded everything over the last seven or eight years or so, slowly, but surely. Should I be taxed higher? Yeah, absolutely. Nobody has managed to raise any argument to me yet explaining why they shouldn't...but as far as THAT kind of a tax rate is concerned, I think the realms of 75% should be reserved for guys like the Koch brothers, the Murdochs, the Gates, professional athletes, Hollywood's A-Listers...sorry, call me crazy, but nobody needs hundreds of millions of dollars, let alone billions. There's just no logical reason to have or need that much money, and no one individual person should ever need that much money.
                    Twistin' by the pool.

                    Comment

                    • Nickdfresh
                      SUPER MODERATOR

                      • Oct 2004
                      • 49219

                      #25
                      I don't know much about French politics, but I'm betting this is largely a faux political stance to assuage the socialist base there and probably won't ever happen...

                      Comment

                      • bueno bob
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Jul 2004
                        • 22951

                        #26
                        Originally posted by LoungeMachine
                        The only true "job creators" is the middle class

                        If I'm not buying shit, then it's not being sold.
                        If it's not being sold, then it stops being viable (music stores, anyone?)
                        If it's not viable, then the people who sell it to me can't work.
                        I create jobs.
                        Twistin' by the pool.

                        Comment

                        • binnie
                          DIAMOND STATUS
                          • May 2006
                          • 19145

                          #27
                          Originally posted by bueno bob
                          If I'm not buying shit, then it's not being sold.
                          If it's not being sold, then it stops being viable (music stores, anyone?)
                          If it's not viable, then he people who sell it to me can't work.
                          I create jobs.
                          And if you're not confident in the economy, you won't buy shit. And employers won't take the chance on expanding, and so on.....

                          Economics comes down to confidence more than almost anything else. Most of us don't really understand it, and the more the media and talking heads discuss recession, the longer we'll be in one.
                          The Power Of The Riff Compels Me

                          Comment

                          • Satan
                            ROTH ARMY ELITE
                            • Jan 2004
                            • 6664

                            #28
                            Originally posted by bueno bob
                            If I'm not buying shit, then it's not being sold.
                            If it's not being sold, then it stops being viable (music stores, anyone?)
                            If it's not viable, then the people who sell it to me can't work.
                            I create jobs.
                            Exactly.....

                            and that's why "supply side economics" is, and always has been a goddamned lie. It's the demand that drives the REAL economy. Always has, always will.
                            Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

                            Originally posted by Sockfucker
                            I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

                            Comment

                            • bueno bob
                              DIAMOND STATUS
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 22951

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Satan
                              Exactly.....

                              and that's why "supply side economics" is, and always has been a goddamned lie. It's the demand that drives the REAL economy. Always has, always will.
                              I also place a lot of the blame on the media itself. Like binnie mentioned, a lot of the "economy" (fickle bitch that she is) depends on what people THINK about it. A good economy doesn't really get people terribly excited, but a bad one does. Everybody slows down to look at a train wreck, right? The media tells you the economy is bad - you believe it, because they must be telling the truth. So you don't buy stuff - you save what money you have. You're not pumping anything into small or large business any more than you absolutely have to, so as a panic measure, those corporations start killing jobs, outsourcing overseas to cheaper labor and shutting down locations to save their own money...and that's where capitalism eventually fails. Unless the media decides to convince us the economy is better (which they probably won't), it's going to keep on this way.

                              That's why I try to tell people how great the economy is. I'm doing my part!
                              Twistin' by the pool.

                              Comment

                              • WACF
                                Crazy Ass Mofo
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 2920

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Seshmeister
                                Ahhh but you are not comparing like with like there.

                                The UK does not have local income tax which Canada has at what 10% on top of all those? In the UK 2/3rds of local government spending comes from the central(federal) government the other 3rd from a a local tax based on the price of your house which is usually around $3k a year.

                                Once you add it all up there isn't a huge difference between the UK, Canada and the US who are all quite low by Western standards.



                                When I found this out I was quite surprised at how much Americans get ripped off because they don't get universal healthcare for their money, I guess because so much gets pissed away on defence.
                                Gotcha...so then you do not have like a provincial tax?

                                Here every province taxes at a different level...the Feds then use Federal Transfer Payments to help even out the provinces...

                                Comment

                                Working...