Your hero Kennedy must have been a BCE man too then. He's the dumbfuck that thought it was a good idea to send another 15,000 Americans to Viet Nam after Ike warned him what was going to happen. Nixon ended the fucking war Kennedy got us into. Ike sent 900 Americans to Viet Nam as advisors, that's it. After Kennedy was killed Johnson sent more Americans over there. Everything I just added is verifiable fact not fantasy like the mother fucking BCE.
Repuke Blames Satan for Homosexuality, and says Kick Gays out of the GOP
Collapse
X
-
-
And did you consider that in fact, he was trying to END the US role in Vietnam before it escalated into a war, and that was one of the reasons they murdered him?
The BCE/CIA moved a lot of heroin through Southeast Asia in those days (and the French did it before they did) which had a lot more to do with why they wanted to occupy Vietnam. It was never about an imaginary Communist threat to the US from some pissy little third world country on the other side of the planet.
So where ever you get your "verifiable facts" from, they left a lot of facts out.Eternally Under the Authority of Satan
Originally posted by SockfuckerI've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.Comment
-
They are moving heroin now. They have our soldiers guarding the poppies. It's coming in the country and we are going to see more people die from it. Yup, the Bush organization has been running an opium war on the US for a very long time.
Kennedy knew the South Vietnam government was totally corrupt. He also knew North Vietnam was no threat of communist world expansion. He sent some advisors and that was pretty much it. Vietnam was about drugs and weapons sales and oh, creating some dissent at home for some divide and conquer strategy.Last edited by Nitro Express; 02-08-2014, 09:01 PM.No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
Jimmy Carter was a victim of really bad timing. Any President who had to clean up the messes of Vietnam and Watergate at the same time was destined to get screwed. Even though the BCE were the ones responsible for both.
Aside from his documented obvious success with the whole Egypt & Israel thing, look at the course that Carter set your country on when it came to alternative energy and getting the fuck off fossil fuels. And just imagine where the US could be right now, if he would have served 8 years in office, and then handed it off to another sane President, instead of Poppy rigging the October Surprise, swindling the BCE back into office and beginning the current 33 year toilet spiral decline of the (formerly) "free world".Last edited by Nitro Express; 02-08-2014, 09:07 PM.No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!Comment
-
If adding over 15,000 troops by 1963 before he was killed isn't escalation , what is it? You completely glossed over the word "advisors" but that's to be expected. Then comes the "verifiable facts" challenge. Show me any legitimite evidence that the BCE even exists and I'll get back with you. If we took over anybody's drug trade from the French then it's the Kennedys who were behind it, not the mythical BCE.Beware of DogComment
-
Kennedy knew the South Vietnam government was totally corrupt. He also knew North Vietnam was no threat of communist world expansion. He sent some advisors and that was pretty much it. Vietnam was about drugs and weapons sales and oh, creating some dissent at home for some divide and conquer strategy.Beware of DogComment
-
Beware of DogComment
-
CIA, Heroin Still Rule Day in Afghanistan
This article is a few years old, but the principal facts remain intact......
By Victor Thorn
Afghanistan now supplies over 90 percent of the world’s heroin, generating nearly $200 billion in revenue. Since the U.S. invasion on Oct. 7, 2001, opium output has increased 33-fold (to over 8,250 metric tons a year).
The U.S. has been in Afghanistan for over seven years, has spent $177 billion in that country alone, and has the most powerful and technologically advanced military on Earth. GPS tracking devices can locate any spot imaginable by simply pushing a few buttons.
Still, bumper crops keep flourishing year after year, even though heroin production is a laborious, intricate process. The poppies must be planted, grown and harvested; then after the morphine is extracted it has to be cooked, refined, packaged into bricks and transported from rural locales across national borders. To make heroin from morphine requires another 12-14 hours of laborious chemical reactions. Thousands of people are involved, yet—despite the massive resources at our disposal—heroin keeps flowing at record levels.
Common sense suggests that such prolific trade over an extended period of time is no accident, especially when the history of what has transpired in that region is considered. While the CIA ran its operations during the Vietnam War, the Golden Triangle supplied the world with most of its heroin. After that war ended in 1975, an intriguing event took place in 1979 when Zbigniew Brzezinski covertly manipulated the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan.
Behind the scenes, the CIA, along with Pakistan’s ISI, were secretly funding Afghanistan’s mujahideen to fight their Russian foes. Prior to this war, opium production in Afghanistan was minimal. But according to historian Alfred McCoy, an expert on the subject, a shift in focus took place. “Within two years of the onslaught of the CIA operation in Afghanistan, the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the world’s top heroin producer.”
Soon, as Professor Michel Chossudovsky notes, “CIA assets again controlled the heroin trade. As the mujahideen guerrillas seized territory inside Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant poppies as a revolutionary tax. Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan intelligence operated hundreds of heroin laboratories.”
Eventually, the Soviet Union was defeated (their version of Vietnam), and ultimately lost the Cold War. The aftermath, however, proved to be an entirely new can of worms. During his research, McCoy discovered that “the CIA supported various Afghan drug lords, for instance Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. The CIA did not handle heroin, but it did provide its drug lord allies with transport, arms, and political protection.”
By 1994, a new force emerged in the region—the Taliban—that took over the drug trade. Chossudovsky again discovered that “the Americans had secretly, and through the Pakistanis [specifically the ISI], supported the Taliban’s assumption of power.”
These strange bedfellows endured a rocky relationship until July 2000 when Taliban leaders banned the planting of poppies. This alarming development, along with other disagreements over proposed oil pipelines through Eurasia, posed a serious problem for power centers in the West. Without heroin money at their disposal, billions of dollars could not be funneled into various CIA black budget projects. Already sensing trouble in this volatile region, 18 influential neo-cons signed a letter in 1998 which became a blueprint for war—the infamous Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
Fifteen days after 9-11, CIA Director George Tenet sent his top-secret Special Operations Group (SOG) into Afghanistan. One of the biggest revelations in Tenet’s book, At the Center of the Storm, was that CIA forces directed the Afghanistan invasion, not the Pentagon.
In the Jan. 26, 2003, issue of Time magazine, Douglas Waller describes Donald Rumsfeld’s reaction to this development. “When aides told Rumsfeld that his Army Green Beret A-Teams couldn’t go into Afghanistan until the CIA contingent had lain the groundwork with
local warlords, he erupted, ‘I have all these guys under arms, and we’ve got to wait like little birds in a nest for the CIA to let us go in?’”
ARMITAGE A MAJOR PLAYER
But the real operator in Afghanistan was Richard Armitage, a man whose legend includes being the biggest heroin trafficker in Cambodia and Laos during the Vietnam War; director of the State Department’s Foreign Narcotics Control Office (a front for CIA drug dealing); head of the Far East Company (used to funnel drug money out of the Golden Triangle); a close liaison with Oliver North during the Iran-Contra cocaine-for-guns scandal; a primary Pentagon official in the terror and covert ops field under George Bush the Elder; one of the original signatories of the infamous PNAC document; and the man who helped CIA Director William Casey run weapons to the mujahideen during their war against the Soviet Union. Armitage was also stationed in Iran during the mid-1970s right before Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini overthrew the shah. Armitage may well be the greatest covert operator in U.S. history.
On Sept. 10, 2001, Armitage met with the UK’s national security advisor, Sir David Manning. Was Armitage “passing on specific intelligence information about the impending terrorist attacks”? The scenario is plausible because one day later—on 9-11—Dick Cheney directly called for Armitage’s presence down in his bunker. Immediately after WTC 2 was struck, Armitage told BBC Radio, “I was told to go to the operations center [where] I spent the rest of the day in the ops center with the vice president.”
These two share a long history together. Not only was Armitage employed by Cheney’s former company Halliburton (via Brown & Root), he was also a deputy when Cheney was secretary of defense under Bush the Elder. More importantly, Cheney and Armitage had joint business and consulting interests in the Central Asian pipeline which had been contracted by Unocal. The only problem standing between them and the Caspian Sea’s vast energy reserves was the Taliban.
Since the 1980s, Armitage amassed a huge roster of allies in Pakistan’s ISI. He was also one of the “Vulcans”—along with Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim—who coordinated Bush’s geo-strategic foreign policy initiatives. Then, after 9-11, he negotiated with the Pakistanis prior to our invasion of Afghanistan, while also becoming Bush’s deputy secretary of state stationed in Afghanistan.
Our “enemy,” or course, was the Taliban “terrorists.” But George Tenet, Colin Powell, Porter Goss, and Armitage had developed a close relationship with Pakistan’s military head of the ISI—General Mahmoud Ahmad— who was cited in a Sept. 2001 FBI report as “supporting and financing the alleged 9-11 terrorists, as well as having links to al Qaeda and the Taliban.”
The line between friend and foe gets even murkier. Afghan President Hamid Karzai not only collaborated with the Taliban, but he was also on Unocal’s payroll in the mid-1990s. He is also described by Saudi Arabia’s Al-Watan newspaper as being “a Central Intelligence Agency covert operator since the 1980s that collaborated with the CIA in funding U.S. aid to the Taliban.”
Capturing a new, abundant source for heroin was an integral part of the U.S. “war on terror.” Hamid Karzai is a puppet ruler of the CIA; Afghanistan is a full-fledged narco-state; and the poppies that flourish there have yet to be eradicated, as was proven in 2003 when the Bush administration refused to destroy the crops, despite having the chance to do so. Major drug dealers are rarely arrested, smugglers enjoy carte blanche immunity, and Nushin Arbabzadah, writing for The Guardian, theorized that “U.S. Army planes leave Afghanistan carrying coffins empty of bodies, but filled with drugs.” Is that why the military protested so vehemently when reporters tried to photograph returning caskets?Eternally Under the Authority of Satan
Originally posted by SockfuckerI've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.Comment
-
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
Beware of DogComment
-
I'm sure this is your kind of source pinko.Beware of DogComment
-
I'm not "pink". I'm bright red. So what's your point?
I quote an article that spells out the BCE/CIA drug operations and how they moved from Vietnam to Afghanistan over the years, and you want to call into question everything the guy ever wrote?
If you don't like Victor Thorn, then do your own research. The facts on BCE/CIA drug smuggling ain't that hard to find. I just liked this writer's name because it reminded me of those Omen movies from the 1970s. You know..... those fictional accounts of my son, the Antichrist.Eternally Under the Authority of Satan
Originally posted by SockfuckerI've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.Comment
-
I'm not "pink". I'm bright red. So what's your point?
I quote an article that spells out the BCE/CIA drug operations and how they moved from Vietnam to Afghanistan over the years, and you want to call into question everything the guy ever wrote?
If you don't like Victor Thorn, then do your own research. The facts on BCE/CIA drug smuggling ain't that hard to find. I just liked this writer's name because it reminded me of those Omen movies from the 1970s. You know..... those fictional accounts of my son, the Antichrist.Beware of DogComment
-
Well, I haven't read that book. But it's not much of a stretch to say that J. Edna Hoover wasn't a big fan of the Kennedys. I don't think he was in charge of the murders, but he was probably a willing participant in the coverup. I have no unholy idea what the sexual orientation was of the CIA assassins who actually shot JFK.Eternally Under the Authority of Satan
Originally posted by SockfuckerI've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.Comment
Comment