If this is your first visit to the Roth Army, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What has any of this got to do with the Duggar dude forcibly fondling girls when he was 15? Why is the term child molestation being used when the age of the victim isn't being told? Like I said I'd need a little more info before I joined his lynching party. For all I know he was just a teenage boy getting handsy with a teenage girl who didn't like it. If he was fondling little girls that's a different story. But it doesn't specify how old the girl or girls were.
Because he was on a family values council or some shit and feels the need to lecture people on morality...
A little 'fondling?' I think that usually means he did more than just grab them. He admits to that but there is more to it!!..
Because he was on a family values council or some shit and feels the need to lecture people on morality...
A little 'fondling?' I think that usually means he did more than just grab them. He admits to that but there is more to it!!..
The first sentence looks like the answer to a completely different question. I asked what an inquiry into a boys prostitution ring during the Reagan administration has to do with Duggar. He was only a couple years old then.
As for the second sentence I never used the term "a little fondling" He admits to fondling. How do you know there's more to it? Where you there? Are you psychic?
What math? It doesn't say who he fondled. It says he hurt others incuding his family and close friends. That could mean he fondled his sisters but it could mean his actions hurt his family and friends in a less than literate fashion. If he did fondle his sisters he's a sick fuck but it doesn't say that.
The first sentence looks like the answer to a completely different question. I asked what an inquiry into a boys prostitution ring during the Reagan administration has to do with Duggar. He was only a couple years old then.
That one sailed over your head bud. I think Ford was making a wider point on the "hypocrisy" of right wing shitbags saying one thing and doing the other...
As for the second sentence I never used the term "a little fondling" He admits to fondling. How do you know there's more to it? Where you there? Are you psychic?
How do you know there isn't? He only fucked them a little bit? Sounds like legalese bullshit...
Any other self-identified child molesters you want to stick up for, c-dog?
I'm not sticking up for anybody. You presented an article saying this Duggar dude admitted to fondling someone when he was 15 years old. It doesn't say it was a child, his sisters or any of the other things you've accused him of. The word rape was added by you. If you've got more to add to the story add it. Otherwise you're just pushing the same old one sided political propaganda you always peddle.
I'm not sticking up for anybody. You presented an article saying this Duggar dude admitted to fondling someone when he was 15 years old. It doesn't say it was a child, his sisters or any of the other things you've accused him of. The word rape was added by you. If you've got more to add to the story add it. Otherwise you're just pushing the same old one sided political propaganda you always peddle.
Oh Jesus fuck! Are you his motherfucking lawyer now? Seriously, WTF? Like you never admitted which sock you fucked?
So he's a molester that didn't molest that bad? (who admits it now that the statue of limitations is up?)
That one sailed over your head bud. I think Ford was making a wider point on the "hypocrisy" of right wing shitbags saying one thing and doing the other...
How do you know there isn't? He only fucked them a little bit? Sounds like legalese bullshit...
Ford was spreading more one sided political propaganda. Nothing new about that.
Where does it say anybody fucked anybody? First it was you know he did more than fondle now he fucked somebody. What's next, murder accusations? Sounds like embellishment.
I'm not sticking up for anybody. You presented an article saying this Duggar dude admitted to fondling someone when he was 15 years old. It doesn't say it was a child, his sisters or any of the other things you've accused him of. The word rape was added by you. If you've got more to add to the story add it. Otherwise you're just pushing the same old one sided political propaganda you always peddle.
Josh Duggar, one of the members of the family that stars in TLC's "19 Kids and Counting" ... was the subject of a police investigation for allegedly sexually molesting 5 girls, some of whom are his sisters.
That's more like it. The police report while hard to read did indicate several people were questioned about being touched inapropriately by another person and indicated they had been. The investigating officer concluded that none of these things happened within the statute of limitations and the case was closed. Sometime later Josh Duggar confessed to some wrongdoing but didn't go into specifics.
In conclusion I see these facts. A 14 year old boy inapropriately touched several girls. Some or all of them were his sisters. Some on the breasts, some on the buttocks, some on their vagina. I'm not clear on when the parents found out but they did and chose not to turn their son in but they did seperate him from his victims eventually. When confronted about the allegations in the police report Duggar confessed.
That's some bad shit right there but it was quite a few years ago and Duggar was a 14 year old boy not a grown man when he did these things. It doesn't excuse what he did but what if anything could or should be done about it now? If I was his wife I damn sure wouldn't trust him to be alone with my children but that doesn't mean he has done anything of that nature since then. Ford thinks we should lynch the guy. What would that accomplish? Would Ford give a shit if the guy wasn't a conservative? Fuck no. But it advances his agenda that all conservatives are evil and liberals do no wrong. Nick started this thread claiming Duggar was a rapist. If he had just accused him of what he had actually done that would have been bad enough for Duggar but he had to enbellish. Then Ford had to tie the BCE into it to further his agenda. Congratulations. You've made your point but you couldn't just stick to the facts even though the facts were on your side. Duggar and family are gonna pay dearly. This won't blow over like the duck peoples shit did. Anyone who trys to back this guy up now is gonna look like they aprove of child molestation.
Thanx Twonabomber. At least you put a little effort into proving your case.
Comment